Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:17:04.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bentazon Spray Retention, Activity, and Foliar Washoff in Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Krishna N. Reddy ,
Martin A. Locke  and
Kevin D. Howard
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., and Agric. Eng., Appl. and Prod. Tech. Res. Unit, USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Martin A. Locke
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., and Agric. Eng., Appl. and Prod. Tech. Res. Unit, USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Kevin D. Howard
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., and Agric. Eng., Appl. and Prod. Tech. Res. Unit, USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the effects of adjuvant and rainfall on bentazon spray retention, efficacy, and foliar washoff in hemp sesbania, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and velvetleaf. Bentazon was applied at 0.28 to 2.24 kg ai/ha with Agri-Dex, a crop oil concentrate (COC) or Kinetic, an organiosilicone-nonionic surfactant blend (OSB) when weeds were at the three- to five-leaf stage. Plants were subjected to 2.5 cm simulated rainfall for 20 min at 1 and 24 h after application of bentazon. Shoot fresh weight reduction assessed 2 wk after treatment was similar with either adjuvant on velvetleaf and smooth pigweed. OSB enhanced bentazon efficacy in hemp sesbania and sicklepod as compared to COC. Rainfall at 1 h after application generally reduced bentazon activity in all weeds. OSB maintained bentazon activity in hemp sesbania when subjected to rainfall at 1 h after application as compared to COC. Overall, bentazon spray retention on plants was 9 to 550% higher with OSB as compared to COC among the species at 1 h after application. Amount of bentazon residue washed off from the foliage by rainfall within a weed species was relatively similar for both adjuvants except in smooth pigweed and ranged from 39 to 98% among the four weed species at 1 h after application. OSB exhibited specificity for certain weed species and the potential to minimize bentazon spray reaching the soil by increasing deposition.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidehemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill # SEBEXsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOBsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACHvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus # ABUTHAdjuvantcontact anglerainfallspray depositionsurface tensionAbutilon theophrastiAmaranthus hybridusSenna obtusifoliaSesbania exaltataABUTHAMACHCASOBSEBEX
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 773 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1993. Crop Protection Chemical Reference, 9th ed., C and P Press, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. p. 179–197.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., and Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Effect of simulated rainfall on herbicide performance in huisache (Acacia farnesiana) and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Technol. 4:26–30.Google Scholar
3. Boydston, R. A. and Al-Khatib, K. 1994. DC X2–5309 organosilicone adjuvant improves control of kochia (Kochia scoparia) with bentazon and bromoxynil. Weed Technol. 8:99–104.Google Scholar
4. Bryson, C. T. 1987. Effects of rainfall on foliar herbicides applied to rhizome johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 35:115–119.Google Scholar
5. Bryson, C. T. 1990. Interference and critical time of removal of hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 4:833–837.Google Scholar
6. Doran, D. L. and Andersen, R. N. 1975. Effects of simulated rainfall on bentazon activity. Weed Sci. 23:105–109.Google Scholar
7. Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Schaffers, W. C. 1992. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with bentazon plus additives. Weed Technol. 6:85–90.Google Scholar
8. Field, R. J. and Bishop, N. G. 1988. Promotion of stomatal infiltration of glyphosate by an organosilicone surfactant reduces the critical rainfall period. Pestic. Sci. 24:55–62.Google Scholar
9. Harr, J., Guggenheim, R., Schulke, G., and Falk, R. H. 1991. The leaf surface of major weeds. Sandoz Agro Ltd. CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. p. 11 with illustrations.Google Scholar
10. Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci. 1:156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Huber, R. and Otto, S. 1994. Environmental behavior of bentazon herbicide. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 137:111–134.Google Scholar
12. Knoche, M. 1994. Organosilicone surfactant performance in agricultural spray application: a review. Weed Res. 34:221–239.Google Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. 1985. The physiological effects of adjuvants on plants. p. 141–158 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. II. Herbicide Physiology. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G., Ouzts, C., and Hanks, J. E. 1993. Spread of water and oil droplets on Johnsongrass (Sorghum halpense) leaves. Weed Sci. 41:460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Meyer, L. D. and Harmon, W. C. 1979. Multiple-intensity rainfall simulator for erosion research on row sideslopes. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 22:100–103.Google Scholar
16. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) control with bentazon plus additives. Weed Sci. 25:506–510.Google Scholar
17. Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504–507.Google Scholar
18. Penner, D. 1989. The impact of adjuvants on herbicide antagonism. Weed Technol. 3:227–231.Google Scholar
19. Reddy, K. N. and Singh, M. 1992. Organosilicone adjuvant effects on glyphosate efficacy and rainfastness. Weed Technol. 6:361–365.Google Scholar
20. Reddy, K. N. and Singh, M. 1992. Organosilicone adjuvants increased the efficacy of glyphosate for control of weeds in citrus (Citrus spp.). HortScience 27:1003–1005.Google Scholar
21. Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Bryson, C. T. 1994. Foliar washoff and runoff losses of lactofen, norflurazon, and fluometuron under simulated rainfall. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:2338–2343.Google Scholar
22. Roggenbuck, F. C., Burow, R. F., and Penner, D. 1994. Relationship of leaf position to herbicide absorption and organosilicone adjuvant efficacy. Weed Technol. 8:582–585.Google Scholar
23. Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Petroff, L., and Burow, R. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:576–580.Google Scholar
24. Thonke, K. E., Kudsk, P., and Streibig, J. C. 1989. The effect of adjuvants on the rainfastness of glyphosate applied on quackgrass (Elymus repens). p. 103–110 in Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Vol. II. Recent Development, Application, and Bibliography of Agroadjuvants. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
25. Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3:60–66.Google Scholar
26. Zabkiewicz, J. A., and Gaskin, R. E. 1989. Effect of adjuvants on uptake and translocation of glyphosate in gorse (Ulex europaeus L.). p. 141–149 in Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Vol. I. Mode of Action and Physiological Activity. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar