Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:48:03.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) Control in Dry-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa) with Soil-Applied and Postemergence Herbicide Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Donnie K. Miller  and
Stephen H. Crawford
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Stephen H. Crawford
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted from 1994 through 1996 to evaluate barnyardgrass control, rice yield, and estimated economic returns with delayed preemergence (DPRE) applications of pendimethalin, quinclorac, thiobencarb, pendimethalin plus quinclorac, and pendimethalin plus thiobencarb applied alone or followed by postemergence (POST) applications of propanil or propanil plus molinate. Late-season barnyardgrass control with pendimethalin plus quinclorac was greater than with pendimethalin, quinclorac, thiobencarb, or pendimethalin plus thiobencarb. Control with pendimethalin, quinclorac, and pendimethalin plus thiobencarb exceeded that with thiobencarb. Propanil plus molinate controlled barnyardgrass more effectively than propanil. Quinclorac and pendimethalin plus quinclorac were the only DPRE herbicide treatments where yield and estimated economic returns were not improved by POST herbicides.

Keywords

Molinate, S-ethyl hexahydro-1H-azepine-1-carbothioatependimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminepropanil, N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)propanamidequinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acidthiobencarb, S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]diethylcarbamothioatebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGEstimated economic returnweed managementpendimethalinpropanilmolinatequincloracthiobencarbECHCGDPRE, delayed preemergencePOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 69 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L., 1995. A consolidated approach to weed management in rice (final report). <i>In</i> Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 446. pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Comparison of single and multiple applications of propanil and residual herbicides in dry-seeded rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i>). Weed Technol. 9:153–157.Google Scholar
Giesler, G., and Heagler, A. 1994. Projected costs and returns—rice. Louisiana. 1994. <i>In</i> Projected Costs and Returns and Cash Flows for Major Agricultural Enterprises Louisiana, 1994. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Agric. Experiment Station A.E.A. Information Ser. 117–124. pp. F-60–F-61.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B. Jr., Helms, R. S., Beaty, J. D., Black, H. L., and Ashcraft, R. W. 1994. Reduced rate combinations of quinclorac with thiobencarb, propanil, and propanil + molinate. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 25: 158–159.Google Scholar
Helms, R. S., Guy, C. B. Jr., Black, H. L., and Ashcrafts, R. W. 1995. Weed management in rice. <i>In</i> Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 446. pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
Helms, R. S., Guy, C. B. Jr., Black, H. L., and Grove, J. A. 1994. Weed management in rice. <i>In</i> Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1993. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 439. pp. 40–42.Google Scholar
L, Jordan. D. 1997. Efficacy of reduced-rate herbicide combinations in dry-seeded rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i>) on alluvial clay soils. Weed Sci. 45:151–157.Google Scholar
Long, D. W., Street, J. E., and Watkins, B. 1993. Delayed preemergence applications of pendimethalin to rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:97.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Guy, C., Beaty, D., Helms, R., and Grove, J. 1993. Pendimethalin—delayed preemergence in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:326.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., and Gay, C. B. Jr., 1993. Management strategies for rice pests: weed control in rice (grass, red rice, broadleaf and sedge control). <i>In</i> Wells, B. R., ed. Rice Research Studies 1994. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Ser. 431. pp. 58–64.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr., and Hill, J. E. 1990. Weed control technology in U.S. rice. <i>In</i> Grayson, B. T., Green, M. B., and Copping, L. D., eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: Elsevier. pp. 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. E., and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i>) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7:600–604.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Ogg, A. G. Jr., Boerdoom, C. M., Alldredge, J. R., and Papendick, R. I. 1994. Integration of weed management and tillage practices in spring dry pea production. Agron. J. 86:868–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar