Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:57:05.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application Timing for Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Dicamba Tank Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric Spandl ,
Thomas L. Rabaey ,
James J. Kells  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Eric Spandl
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Thomas L. Rabaey
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Optimal application timing for dicamba–acetamide tank mixes was examined in field studies conducted in Michigan and Wisconsin from 1993 to 1995. Dicamba was tank mixed with alachlor, metolachlor, or SAN 582H and applied at planting, 7 d after planting, and 14 d after planting. Additional dicamba plus alachlor tank mixes applied at all three timings were followed by nicosulfuron postemergence to determine the effects of noncontrolled grass weeds on corn yield. Delaying application of dicamba–acetamide tank mixes until 14 d after planting often resulted in lower and less consistent giant foxtail control compared with applications at planting or 7 d after planting. Corn grain yield was reduced at one site where giant foxtail control was lower when application was delayed until 14 d after planting. Common lambsquarters control was excellent with 7 or 14 d after planting applications. At one site, common lambsquarters control and corn yield was reduced by application at planting. Dicamba–alachlor tank mixes applied 7 d after planting provided similar weed control or corn yield, while at planting and 14 d after planting applications provided less consistent weed control or corn yield than a sequential alachlor plus dicamba treatment or an atrazine-based program.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamideatrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminedicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidSAN 582H, 2-chloro-N[(1-methyl-2-methoxy)ethyl]-N-(2,4-dimethyl-thien-3-yl)acetamidemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAcorn, Zea mays L.Atrazine alternativesalachloratrazinemetolachlornicosulfuronSAN 582HChenopodium albumSetaria faberiCHEALSETFAAP, at plantingCOC, crop oil concentrateDAP, days after plantingPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 602 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1995. State of Wisconsin Atrazine Pesticides; Use Restrictions. Madison WI: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade and Consumer Protection. 4 p.Google Scholar
Bauman, T. T. 1992. Atrazine management in the eastern and south central corn belt. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:152–153.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 11:373–378.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G. 1977. Interactions between dicamba and other preemergence corn herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 17:1.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D. 1985. Herbicide absorption and translocation and their relationship to plant tolerances and susceptibility. In Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology: Volume II, Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
Myers, M. G. and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) control in field corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 7:884–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neher, N. J. 1995. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed 1996 Amendments to Rules on the Use of Pesticides Containing Atrazine. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture Trade and Consumer Protection. 34 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. and Jones, R. D. 1994. Potential regulatory problems associated with atrazine, cyanazine, and alachlor in surface water source drinking water. Weed Technol. 8:852–861.Google Scholar