Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:28:35.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application Timing Determines Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi) and Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) Control in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald F. Krausz ,
Bryan G. Young ,
George Kapusta  and
Joseph L. Matthews
Ronald F. Krausz*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, 2036 Charles Lane, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, 2036 Charles Lane, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, 2036 Charles Lane, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, 2036 Charles Lane, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author: R. F. Krausz.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1996 to 1998 to evaluate grass control in no-till corn (Zea mays) with herbicides applied early preplant (EPP), preemergence (PRE), and postemergence (POST) at the Belleville Research Center at Belleville, IL. Grass control was affected by application timing rather than herbicide. The herbicides applied PRE provided more consistent giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control (90 to 98%) than the same herbicides applied EPP (0 to 92%). There also was no difference in giant foxtail and barnyardgrass control between the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation and microencapsulated (ME) formulation of acetochlor. Rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron applied POST provided 90 to 97% control of giant foxtail and barnyardgrass. Metolachlor, EC-acetochlor, SAN 582H, and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron provided 85 to 92% control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) compared with 63 to 74% control for BAY FOE 5043 plus metribuzin and ME-acetochlor. Corn grain yield was greater with herbicides applied either PRE or POST than applied EPP. Grass control and grain yield were greater with herbicides applied either PRE or POST compared with EPP.

Keywords

giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPEScorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3335’Early preplantpreemergencepostemergenceDAP, days after plantingEC, emulsifiable concentrate formulationEPP, early preplantME, microencapsulated formulationPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 161 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Braverman, M. P., Lavy, T. L., and Barnes, C. J. 1986. The degradation and bioactivity of metolachlor in the soil. Weed Sci. 34: 479–484.Google Scholar
Breaux, E. J. 1987. Initial metabolism of acetochlor in tolerant and susceptible seedlings. Weed Sci. 35: 463–468.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1988. Factors influencing fluorochloridone activity in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1991. Early preplant atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5: 66–71.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Sci. 40: 241–248.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail, Setaria faberi, and velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, density and control in corn, Zea mays . Weed Sci. 36: 642–647.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Mester, T. C. 1991. Effect of tillage systems on the emergence depth of giant (Setaria faberi) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 39: 200–203.Google Scholar
Carey, J. B. and Defelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39: 232–237.Google Scholar
Doub, J. P., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1988. Consecutive annual applications of alachlor and metolachlor to continuous no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36: 340–344.Google Scholar
Fuerst, E. P. 1987. Understanding the mode of action of the chloroacetamide and thiocarbamate herbicides. Weed Technol. 1: 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Defelice, M. S., and Holman, C. S. 1997. Application timing affects weed control with metolachlor plus atrazine in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 5: 520–526.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1993. Weed control and yield are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technol. 7: 443–451.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1993. Mon 13200 early preplant controls giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) season-long in no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7: 872–878.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Wax, L. M. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16: 393–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, T. C. and Hayes, R. M. 1997. Effect of tillage and soil-applied herbicides on broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 698–703.Google Scholar
Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33: 874–881.Google Scholar
Petersen, B. B. and Shea, P. J. 1989. Miroencapsulated alachlor and its behavior on wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw. Weed Sci. 37: 719–723.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applcations for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32: 293–298.Google Scholar
Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 629–635.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0024, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33: 531–536.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Hatzios, K. K., and Doub, J. P. 1988. Efficacy comparisons of alachlor and metolachlor formulations in the field. Weed Technol. 1: 24–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 26: 648–652.Google Scholar
Wrucke, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Weed species distribution as influenced by tillage and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33: 853–856.Google Scholar
Vasilakoglou, I. B. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 1997. Activity, adsorption, mobility, efficacy, and persistence of alachlor as influenced by formulation. Weed Sci. 45: 579–585.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. and Clark, S. K. 1982. Degradation of three acetanilide herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 30: 545–548.Google Scholar