Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:17:37.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Weed Management Systems Control Weeds in Potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rick A. Boydston  and
Steven F. Vaughn
Rick A. Boydston*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350-9687
Steven F. Vaughn
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, IL 61604
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five weed management systems utilizing combinations of cover crops, herbicides, and cultivation were tested in potato in 1994 and 1995 in central Washington. A standard herbicide treatment of metribuzin applied preemergence (PRE) at 0.4 kg ai/ha (standard herbicide weed management system [STD]) was compared with (1) fall-planted winter rye followed by metribuzin at 0.4 kg/ha applied in a band in the potato hill, followed by reservoir tillage (rye cover crop with herbicide-banded and reservoir-tilled weed management system [RYESTD]); (2) cultivation with tine-tooth harrow followed by hilling with shovels and rolling cultivators (total-cultivation weed management system [CULT]); (3) fall-planted rapeseed followed by reservoir tillage (rapeseed cover crop and reservoir-tilled weed management system [RPSD]); and (4) reservoir tillage alone (reservoir-tilled weed management system [RESTIL]). In both years, early-season weed density and final weed biomass were lower in the STD, RYESTD, and CULT systems than in RPSD and RESTIL. Total tuber yield and yield of U.S. #2 or better were greatest in the RYESTD and STD systems in both years. The CULT system reduced early-season weed densities, but tuber yield was reduced 15% in 1994, and yield of U.S. #2 or better was reduced 25% in 1995 compared with the STD system. The RPSD system reduced early-season in-row weed density from 60 to 70% and final weed biomass from 29 to 40% compared with a nontreated check, i.e., a no–cover crop, no-cultivation, no-herbicide weed management system, but tuber yield was 27 to 30% lower than in the STD system. The RYESTD system was an effective alternative weed management strategy that controlled weeds, decreased PRE-applied herbicide inputs 66%, and maintained tuber yield.

Keywords

Metribuzinpotato, Solanum tuberosum L.rapeseed, Brassica napusrye, Secale cereale L.Bandingcover cropscultivationintegrated weed managementglyphosatereservoir tillagetillageBR, between rowCHECK, no–cover crop, no-cultivation, no-herbicide weed management systemCULT, total-cultivation weed management systemIR, in rowPRE, preemergenceRESTIL, reservoir-tilled weed management systemRPSD, rapeseed cover crop and reservoir-tilled weed management systemRYESTD, rye cover crop with herbicide-banded and reservoir-tilled weed management systemSTD, standard herbicide weed management system
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K. and Boydston, R. 1999. Weed control with Brassica green manure crops. In Narwal, S. S., ed. Allelopathy Update. Volume 2. New Delhi, Calcutta: Oxford Publishing. pp. 255–270.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Boydston, R. 1997. Weed suppression with Brassica green manure crops in green pea. Weed Sci. 45: 439–445.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 1,045–1,057.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. and Hang, A. 1995. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) green manure crop suppresses weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 9: 669–675.Google Scholar
Chitsaz, M. and Nelson, D. C. 1983. Comparison of various weed control programs for potatoes. Am. Potato J. 60: 271–280.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Morra, M. J., Guttieri, M. J., Brown, P. D., and Brown, J. 1998. Glucosinolate production by five field-grown Brassica napus cultivars used as green manures. Weed Technol. 12: 712–718.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Patterson, P. E., Guttieri, M. J., and Stark, J. C. 1997. Efficacy and economics of cultivation for weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 11: 257–264.Google Scholar
Eadie, A. G., Swanton, C. J., Shaw, J. E., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. Banded herbicide applications and cultivation in a modified no-till corn (Zea mays) system. Weed Technol. 6: 535–542.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E. R., Leibman, M., and Huggins, D. R. 1999. Improving soil quality: implications for weed management. J. Crop Prod. 2: 95–12.Google Scholar
Guenthner, J. F., Wiese, M. V., Pavlista, S. D., Sieczka, J. B., and Wyman, J. 1999. Assessment of pesticide use in the U.S. potato industry. Am. J. Potato Res. 76: 25–29.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L., Weston, L. A., Snyder, J. C., and Regnier, E. E. 1996. Separating the effects of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and rye (Secale cereale) root and shoot residues on weed development. Weed Sci. 44: 402–407.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1995. Evaluation of band vs. broadcast herbicide applications in corn and soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 8: 380–384.Google Scholar
Krishnan, G., Holshouser, D. L., and Nissen, S. J. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with green manure crops. Weed Technol. 12: 97–102.Google Scholar
Lanfranconi, L. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Wallace, R. W. 1993. Grain rye residues and weed control strategies in reduced tillage potatoes. Weed Technol. 7: 23–28.Google Scholar
Mayton, H. S., Olivier, C., Vaughn, S. F., and Loria, R. 1996. Correlation of fungicidal activity of Brassica species with allyl isothiocyanate production in macerated leaf tissue. Phytopathology 86: 267–271.Google Scholar
Mojtahedi, H., Santo, G. S., Wilson, J. H., and Hang, A. N. 1993. Managing Meloidogyne chitwoodi on potato with rapeseed as green manure. Plant Dis. 77: 42–46.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1986. Implication of postemergence tillage on root injury and yields of potatoes (Abstr.). Am. Potato J. 63:445.Google Scholar
Olivier, C., Vaughn, S. F., Mizubuti, E.S.G., and Loria, R. 1999. Variation in allyl isothiocyanate production within Brassica species and correlation with fungicidal activity. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 2,687–2,701.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. 1988. Allelopathy: problems and opportunities in weed management. In Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
Rioux, R., Comeau, J. E., and Genereux, H. 1979. Effect of cultural practices and herbicides on weed population and competition in potatoes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59: 367–374.Google Scholar
Shock, C. C. and Seddigh, M. 1998. DCPA losses in furrow irrigation by herbicide banding and straw mulching. Agron. J. 90: 399–404.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, ERS. 1999. Pest management in U.S. agriculture. USDA Publication Agricultural Handbook No. 17.Google Scholar
Vangessel, M. J. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Effect of soil type, hilling time, and weed interference on potato development and yield. Weed Technol. 4: 299–305.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S. 1993. Inhibition of Helminthosporium solani strains by natural isothiocyanates. Am. Potato J. 70: 852–853.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. R. 1989. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) yields and weed populations in conventional and reduced tillage systems. Weed Technol. 3: 590–595.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and Chilton, W. S. 1995. Disappearance of DIBOA-glucoside, DIBOA, and BOA from rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 43: 18–20.Google Scholar