Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:48:17.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption, Desorption, and Degradation of Imidazolinones in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tracy M. Aichele  and
Donald Penner
Tracy M. Aichele
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fate of imazamox, imazethapyr, and imazaquin in soil was evaluated at various soil moisture levels and at soil pH levels of 5 and 7. The percentage of each herbicide sorbed, desorbed, dissipated, and metabolized over time was compared. Soil was kept at its field pH (pH 7) or modified to a lower pH (pH 5) and equilibrated to field moisture contents ranging from 0.27 to 0.21 g water/ g soil, at and below the field capacity of the soil. Soil moisture in the range studied did not affect the fate of the herbicides. The percentage of applied herbicide found in soil solution was greatest for imazamox and least for imazaquin (imazamox > imazethapyr > imazaquin) and was greater at pH 7 than at pH 5 for all three herbicides. Over time, less herbicide was in the soil solution and less was desorbed. Metabolism followed the same pattern. Among the herbicides, metabolism followed the following sequence, imazamox > imazethapyr > imazaquin with metabolism greater at pH 7 than at pH 5 for all three herbicides. At pH 7, the half-life for imazamox was 1.4 wk and for imazethapyr was 16 wk, and the estimated half-life for imazaquin was 191 wk.

Keywords

ImazamoximazaquinimazethapyrAnionic herbicidecarryoverdissipationfatemetabolismpersistencepKasoil moistureLSCliquid scintillation counting
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 154 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Basham, G., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
Bauer, U. and Calvet, R. 1999. Fate of soil applied herbicides: experimental data and predictors of dissipation kinetics. J. Environ. Qual. 28:1765–1777.Google Scholar
Bhalla, P., Hackett, N. M., Hart, R. G., and Lignowski, E. M. 1991. Imazaquin herbicide. in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 239–246.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815–819.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992a. Effects of tillage and application method on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40:482–489.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992b. Photolysis of imidazolinone herbicides in aqueous solution and on soil. Weed Sci. 40:143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, J. L. and Witt, W. W. 1997. Microbial degradation of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 45:586–591.Google Scholar
Hart, R. G., Lignowski, E. M., and Taylor, F. R. 1991. Imazethapyr herbicide. in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 247–256.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected absorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Reese, K. D. 1992. Effect of soil pH on adsorption and persistence of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 40:490–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangels, G. 1991. Behavior of the imidazolinone herbicides in soil: a review of the literature. in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. R. and Parkin, T. B. 1991. Effect of moisture on sorption and biodegradation of carbofuran in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39:2063–2068.Google Scholar
Stonegaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.Google Scholar