Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T01:26:32.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption and Translocation of SC-0051 in Corn and Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gregory R. Armel ,
David J. Mayonado ,
Kriton K. Hatzios  and
Henry P. Wilson
Gregory R. Armel
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
David J. Mayonado
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331
Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted to compare foliar- and root-based absorption and translocation of SC-0051 in corn and soybean using radio-tracer techniques. Visual injury symptoms expressed in soybean by SC-0051 were bleaching in newly formed (meristematic) tissue followed by necrosis. Corn expressed little to no visual injury. SC-0051 was absorbed more rapidly by foliage of corn and soybean than by their roots. Although soybean absorbed more SC-0051 through roots than did corn, there was no difference between species in foliar absorption of SC-0051. SC-0051 was rapidly translocated throughout corn plants but was concentrated mainly in the meristematic tissue of soybean. Even though there were slight differences in absorption and translocation of SC-0051 in corn and soybean, it is likely that differential metabolism of the herbicide explains selectivity.

Keywords

SC-0051 (proposed name sulcotrione), 2-[2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)benzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedionecorn, Zea mays L ‘Gutwein 69B’soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr ‘Essex’Bleaching herbicidesradiolabeled herbicidestriketone herbicidesHAT, hours after treatmentPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 211 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bartlett, D. W. and Hall, G. J. 2000. Mesotrione: uptake, translocation, and metabolism in corn compared to weeds. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:65–66.Google Scholar
Beckett, T. H. and Taylor, S. E. 2000. Postemergence performance of mesotrione in weed control programs. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Conf. 55:47–48.Google Scholar
Beraud, M., Claument, J., and Montury, A. 1991. ICIA 0051, a new herbicide for control of annual weeds in maize. Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. conf.—Weeds. 51–56.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experimental Station Circ. 347.Google Scholar
Mayonado, D. J. 1988. Field, Greenhouse, and Laboratory Studies on the Efficacy and Action of the Herbicides SC-0051 and SC-0774. Ph.D. dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. 114 p.Google Scholar
Mayonado, D. J., Hatzios, K. K., Orcutt, D. M., and Wilson, H. P. 1989. Evaluation of the mechanism of action of the bleaching herbicide SC-0051 in HPLC analysis. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 35:138–145.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Bartlett, D. W., Fraser, T. E., Hawkes, T. R., Holt, D. C., Townson, J. K., and Wichert, R. A. 2001. Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manage. Sci. 57:120–128.Google Scholar
Norris, S. R., Shen, X., and DellaPenna, D. 1998. Complementation of the Arabidopsis pds1 mutant with the gene encoding p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Plant Physiol. 117:1317–1323.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:113–124.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Bhowmik, P. C. 1991. ICIA-0051 for postemergence weed control in conventional corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secor, J. 1994. Inhibition of barnyardgrass 4-hyrdoxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by sulcotrione. Plant Physiol. 106:1429–1433.Google Scholar
Sutton, P. B., Foxon, G. A., Beaud, J. M., Anderson, J., and Wichert, R. 1999. Integrated weed management systems for maize using mesotrione, nicosulfuron and acetochlor. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds: 225–230.Google Scholar
Viviani, F., Little, J. P., and Pallett, K. E. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. II. Characterization of the inhibition of carrot 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by the diketonitrile derivative of RPA 201772. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:125–134.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Foy, C. L. 1990. Weed control in no-tillage and conventional tillage corn (Zea mays) with ICIA-0051 and SC-0774. Weed Technol. 4:731–738.Google Scholar