Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:11:24.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Water- and Dry-seeded Rice, Oryza sativa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Roy J. Smith Jr.
Roy J. Smith Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stuttgart, AR 72160
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides were applied as single, sequential, or tank mixture treatments at different growth stages and rates and were compared with standard treatments for control of barnyardgrass, bearded sprangletop, elipta, spreading dayflower, and aquatic weeds in water- or dry-seeded rice. In water-seeded rice, thiobencarb granules applied alone or sequentially selectively controlled bearded sprangletop and aquatic weeds in the 1- to 4-leaf stages better than standards of propanil alone or mixed with bentazon. Fenoxaprop plus bentazon selectively controlled 1- to 4-leaf bearded sprangletop but failed to control 1- to 4-leaf aquatic weeds. In dry-seeded rice, treatments of fenoxaprop applied to tillering rice after earlier applications of preemergence thiobencarb or postemergence applications of propanil selectively controlled barnyardgrass, bearded sprangletop, eclipta, or spreading dayflower better than standards of propanil alone or mixed with thiobencarb. Fenoxaprop alone or in tank mixtures with other herbicides applied early postemergence either injured rice or failed to control weeds. Esprocarb applied preemergence controlled weeds but injured rice while early postemergence treatments of propanil plus esprocarb performed better than standard herbicide treatments.

Keywords

bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideesprocarb, S-benzyl-N-(1,2-dimethylpropyl)-N-ethyl thiocarbamatefenoxaprop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-benzoxazolyl)oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acidpropanil, N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)propanamidethiobencarb, S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl] diethylcarbamothioatebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.)Beauv. # ECHCGbearded sprangletop, Leptochloa fascicularis (Lam.)Gray # LEFFAeclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. # ECLALrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Bond’, ‘Newbonnet’, and ‘Starbonnet’spreading dayflower, Commelina diffusa Burm. f. #COMDIEchinochloa crus-galliHetheranthera limosaLeptochloa fascicularisesprocarbfenoxaproptriclopyrECHCGHETLILEFFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 242 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adair, C. R., Bollich, C. N., Bowman, D. H., Jodon, N. E., Johnston, T. H., Webb, B. D., and Atkins, J. G. 1973. Rice breeding and testing methods in the United States. p. 22–75 in U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 289. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Eastin, E. F. 1981. Weed management systems for U.S. Rice. p. 539–547 in Pimentel, D., ed. Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Vol. 3. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
3. Richard, E. P., and Street, J. E. 1984. Herbicide performance in rice (Oryza sativa) under three flooding conditions. Weed Sci. 32:157–162.Google Scholar
4. Seaman, D. E. 1983. Farmers' weed control technology for water-seeded rice in North America. p. 167–177 in Proc. Conf. Weed Control in Rice. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.Google Scholar
5. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1977. Comparison of herbicide treatments for weed control in rice. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ser. 233.Google Scholar
6. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Herbicide programs for weed control in rice. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Res. Results ARR-S-8.Google Scholar
7. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Weeds of major economic importance in rice and yield losses due to weed competition. p. 19–36 in Proc. Conf. Weed Control in Rice. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.Google Scholar
8. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Competition of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 31:120–123.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Integrated weed management in rice in the USA. Korean J. Weed Sci. 3:1–13.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. J. Jr., and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686–692.Google Scholar
11. Smith, R. J. Jr., Flinchum, W. T., and Seaman, D. E. 1977. Weed control in U.S. rice production. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 497. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
12. Snipes, C. E., and Street, J. E. 1986. Influence of flood date and cultivar on rice tolerance to fenoxaprop. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:71.Google Scholar
13. University of California. 1983. Integrated pest management for rice. Calif. Div. Agric. Sciences, Berkeley, CA. Pub. 3280:94.Google Scholar
14. U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1952. Testing Agricultural and Vegetable Seeds. Agric. Handb. 30. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar