Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:36:32.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Community Response to Crop Rotations in Western South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Randy L. Anderson ,
Clair E. Stymiest ,
Bruce A. Swan  and
John R. Rickertsen
Randy L. Anderson*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 2923 Medary Avenue, Brookings, SD 57006
Clair E. Stymiest
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, West River Agricultural Center, 1905 Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City, SD 57702
Bruce A. Swan
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, West River Agricultural Center, 1905 Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City, SD 57702
John R. Rickertsen
Affiliation:
South Dakota State University, West River Agricultural Center, 1905 Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City, SD 57702
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Producers in the semiarid Great Plains are exploring alternative crop rotations, with the goal of replacing winter wheat–fallow. In 1993, a study was established to compare performance of eight rotations comprised of various combinations with winter wheat (W), spring wheat (SW), dry pea (Pea), safflower (Saf), corn (C), sunflower (Sun), proso millet (M), or fallow (F). After 8 years, we characterized weed communities by recording seedling emergence in each rotation. Seventeen species were observed, with downy brome, kochia, horseweed, and stinkgrass comprising 87% of the community. Rotations with the least number of weed seedlings were W–F and SW–W–C–Sun; in comparison, weed density was six-fold higher in W–M. Density of downy brome and kochia was highest in W–M compared with other rotations, whereas stinkgrass and green foxtail were prominent in proso millet of the W–M and W–C–M rotations. Horseweed established readily in safflower and dry pea. In the semiarid Great Plains, designing rotations in a cycle of four that includes cool- and warm-season crops can be a key component of integrated weed management.

Keywords

Downy brome, Bromus tectorum L. BROTEgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis L. SETVIhorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq., ERICAkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. KCHSCstinkgrass, Eragrostis cilinensis (All.) E. Mosher ERACNcorn, Zea mays L.dry pea, Pisum sativum L.proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L.safflower, Carthamus tinctorius L.sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Crop diversityrotation designBROTEERACNERICAKCHSCSETVI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 131 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, R. L. 1997. Cultural systems can reduce reproductive potential of winter annual grasses. Weed Technol. 11:608–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 2000. A cultural system approach can eliminate herbicide need in semiarid proso millet. Weed Technol. 14:602–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 2005. A multi-tactic approach to manage weed populations in crop rotations. Agron. J. 97:1579–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. L., Bowman, R. A., Nielsen, D. C., Vigil, M. F., Aiken, R. M., and Benjamin, J. G. 1999. Alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains. J. Prod. Agric. 12:95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Larney, F. O., Lindwall, C. W., and Kozub, G. C. 1994. Crop rotation and tillage effect on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian prairies. Weed Technol. 8:231–237.Google Scholar
Booth, B. D. and Swanton, C. J. 2002. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci. 50:2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, R. A., Vigil, M. F., Nielsen, D. C., and Anderson, R. L. 1999. Soil organic matter changes in intensively cropped dryland systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:186–191.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Anderson, R. L., Blackshaw, R. E., and Maxwell, B. 2002. Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94:174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farahani, H. J., Peterson, G. A., and Westfall, D. G. 1998. Dryland cropping intensification: a fundamental solution to efficient use of precipitation. Adv. Agron. 64:197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F. 1992. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves. Weed Res. 32:29–38.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. in Altieri, M.A., Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL CRC. 213–236.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2005. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed December 8, 2005.Google Scholar
Holtzer, T. O., Anderson, R. L., McMullen, M. P., and Peairs, F. B. 1996. Integrated pest management of insects, plant pathogens, and weeds in dryland cropping systems of the Great Plains. J. Prod. Agric. 9:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[HRAC] Herbicide Resistance Action Committee 2005. Guideline to the Management of Herbicide Resistance. http://www.plantprotection.org/HRAC/index.html. Accessed: December 8, 2005.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Sheard, J. W., and Thomas, A. G. 2000. Weed communities associated with arable Saskatchewan farm management systems. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:177–185.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. A., Schlegel, A. J., Tanaka, D. L., and Jones, O. R. 1996. Precipitation use efficiency as affected by cropping and tillage systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, J. C. 1979. Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora. J. Appl. Ecol. 16:577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stymiest, C. E., Swan, B. A., and Rickertsen, J. R. 2001. Annual research report. West River Ag Center, South Dakota State University, 1905 Plaza Boulevard, Rapid City, SD 57702.Google Scholar
Valenti, S. A. and Wicks, G. A. 1992. Influence of nitrogen rates and wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars on weed control. Weed Sci. 40:115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Ramsel, R. E., Nordquist, P. T., Schmidt, J. W., and Challaiah, . 1986. Impact of wheat cultivars on establishment and suppression of summer annual weeds. Agron. J. 78:59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Smika, D. E. 1990. Central Great Plains. Pages 127–157 in Donald, W.W. ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 127–157.Google Scholar