Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:17:06.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tree Growth, Fruit Size, and Yield Response of Mature Peach to Weed-Free Intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew W. MacRae ,
Wayne E. Mitchem ,
David W. Monks ,
Michael L. Parker  and
Roger K. Galloway
Andrew W. MacRae*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Wayne E. Mitchem
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Michael L. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Roger K. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at one location in 1999 and two locations in 2000 to determine the critical weed-free period for peach in North Carolina. The cultivars for the three locations were ‘Contender’, ‘Norman’, and ‘Summerprince’. Weed-free intervals of 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wk after peach tree bloom were established. Paraquat at 1.1 kg ai/ha plus nonionic surfactant at 0.25% v/v was applied every 10 d, after treatments were initiated at peach bloom, to maintain weed-free plots. Large crabgrass, hairy vetch, and smooth crabgrass were the primary weeds in Contender. Horseweed, smooth crabgrass, and large crabgrass were the primary weeds in Norman. Bermudagrass, smooth pigweed, and common lambsquarters were the primary weeds in Summerprince. No differences in trunk cross-sectional area were observed between the weed-free periods. Maintaining the orchard floor weed-free for 12 wk after peach tree bloom resulted in the greatest fruit size (individual fruit weight and diameter), total yield, and fruit number.

Keywords

Paraquatbermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. CYNDAcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALhairy vetch, Vicia villosa Roth. VICVIhorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICAlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSAsmooth crabgrass, Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Muhl. DIGISsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACHpeach, Prunus persica (L.) Batsch., ‘Contender’, ‘Norman’, and ‘Summerprince’Critical weed-free periodorchard floor management
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 102 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, C. E. and Aldrich, J. H. 1980. Herbicidal effects on peach seedling growth and weed control. Hort. Sci. 15:293–294.Google Scholar
Daniell, J. W. and Hardcastle, W. S. 1972. Response of peach trees to herbicide and mechanical weed control. Weed Sci. 20:133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, D. and Johnson, D. 2005. 2005 Southeastern peach growers' handbook. Handbook No.1. Athens University of Georgia, G.E.S.Google Scholar
Larsen, R. P. and Ries, S. K. 1960. Simazine for controlling weeds in fruit tree and grape plantings. Weeds 8:671–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majek, B. A., Neary, P. E., and Polk, D. F. 1993. Smooth pigweed interference in newly planted peach trees. J. Prod. Agric. 6:244–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, R. L., Meyer, J. R., and Killian, J. C. 1987. Within-tree distribution of cat-facing injury on peaches in North Carolina. J. Agric. Entomol. 4:78–81.Google Scholar
Monks, D. W. and Schultheis, J. R. 1998. Critical weed-free period for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in transplanted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Weed Sci. 46:530–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okie, W. R. 1998. Handbook of peach and nectarine varieties. Agricultural Handbook Number714. Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.Google Scholar
Parker, M. L., Hull, J., and Perry, R. L. 1993. Orchard floor management affects peach rooting. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118:714–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M. L. and Meyer, J. R. 1996. Peach tree vegetative and root growth respond to orchard floor management. Hort. Sci. 31:330–333.Google Scholar
Powell, C. A., Forer, L. B., Stouffer, R. F., Cummins, J. N., Gonsalves, D., Rosenberger, D. A., Hoffman, J., and Lister, R. M. 1984. Orchard weeds as hosts of tomato ringspot and tobacco ringspot viruses. Plant Dis. 68:24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2005. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 9.1.3, Service Pack 2. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sullivan, T. P. and Hogue, E. J. 1987. Influence of orchard floor management on vole and pocket gopher populations and damage in apple orchards. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112:972–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, G. 1975. Weeds in orchards as important alternate sources of green peach aphids in late spring. Environ. Entomol. 4:958–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Kropff, M. J., and Groenveld, R. M. W. 1992. Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: the critical period of weed interference. Weed Sci. 40:302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. C., Skroch, W. A., and Monaco, T. J. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) interference in newly planted peach (Prunus persica) trees. Weed Sci. 33:50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar