Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:23:41.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of pintoi peanut to PRE and POST herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2020

Logan J. Martin ,
José Luiz C.S. Dias ,
Brent A. Sellers Open the ORCID record for Brent A. Sellers [Opens in a new window] ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Ramon G. Leon  and
João M.B. Vendramini
Logan J. Martin
Affiliation:
Former graduate research assistant, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
José Luiz C.S. Dias
Affiliation:
Former graduate research assistant, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
Brent A. Sellers*
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
Jason A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Professor and Director, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Department of Agronomy, Gainesville, FL, USA
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
João M.B. Vendramini
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Brent A. Sellers, Professor, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL33865. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pintoi peanut is a warm-season perennial legume that shows promise as a forage crop for the southeastern United States, however, little is known about the proper methods of weed management during establishment for this species. The objective of this study was to determine the ability of pintoi peanut to tolerate applications of PRE and POST herbicides during the year of and year after planting. The effects of herbicide treatments on percentage of visual estimates of injury and stand counts of pintoi peanut were investigated at Ona and Marianna, FL, in 2015 and 2016. All PRE herbicides did not result in significant injury or stand reduction. Pintoi peanut’s tolerance to POST herbicides was higher when plants were emerged for at least 2 wk prior to herbicide application. Stands of pintoi peanut that were planted the previous year appear to tolerate all herbicides examined in this work, except sulfosulfuron. Results of this study indicate that at the year of planting pintoi peanut is tolerant to PRE applications of pendimethalin, imazethapyr, and imazapic. Pintoi peanut appears to tolerate applications of 2,4-D, carfentrazone, imazapic and imazethapyr the year after planting at the rates utilized in this study. Future research should evaluate the effects of multiple herbicide applications and tank-mixes to obtain satisfactory weed control and selectivity in pintoi peanut swards.

Keywords

2,4-Dcarfentrazoneimazapicimazethapyrpendimethalinsulfosulfuronpintoi peanut, Arachis pintoi Krap. and Greg.‘Amarillo’forageslegumes
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2020 , pp. 870 - 875
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Scott McElroy, Auburn University

References

Ball, DM, Hoveland, CS, Lacefield, GD (2007) Southern Forages, Modern Concepts for Forage Crop Management. 4th ed. Lawrenceville, GA: Graphic Communications Corporation Google Scholar
Carvalho, MA, Quesenberry, KH (2012) Agronomic evaluation of Arachis pintoi (Krap. and Gre.) germplasm in Florida. Arch Zootec 61:19–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B, Pengelly, B, Brown, S, Donnelly, J, Eagles, D, Franco, A, Hanson, J, Mullen, B, Partridge, I, Peters, M, Schultze-Kraft, R (2005) Tropical Forages: An Interactive Selection Tool. Web Tool. CSIRO, DPI&F(Qld), CIAT and ILRI, Brisbane, Australia. http://hdl.handle.net/10568/49072 Accessed: May 2, 2017Google Scholar
Davy, JS, Karle, BM, Kyser, GB, DiTomaso, JM, Rinella, MJ (2015) Broadleaf weed control in irrigated pasture containing Trifolium repens . Crop Pasture Sci 66:985–991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derr, JF (2012). Broadleaf Weed Control with Sulfonylurea Herbicides in Cool-Season Turfgrass. Weed Technol 26:582–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotray, PA, Baughman, TA, Keeling, JW, Grichar, WJ (2001) Effect of imazapic application timing on Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 15:26–29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, SF, Johnson, J, Renz, M, Dorough, H, Tucker, K (2014) Hairy Buttercup Control and White Clover Tolerance to Pasture Herbicides. Forage Grazinglands. doi: 10.2134/fg-2013-0013-rs CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, GW, Grichar, WJ, Pohler, CL, Schubert, AM (1993) Tolerance of three annual forage legumes to selected postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 7:735–739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Sellers, BA, Mudge, CR, Smith, CA (2006) Evaluation of postemergence herbicides on rhizoma peanut injury and yield. Forage Grazinglands. doi: 10.1094/FG‐2006‐0308‐01‐RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, PH, Vance, CP (2003) Legumes; importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–876 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grichar, JW (1997a) Control of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 11:739–743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, JW (1997b) Influence of herbicides and timing of application on broadleaf weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 11:708–713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, JW, Nester, PR, Sestak, DC (1997) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to imazethapyr as affected by timing of application. Peanut Sci 24:10–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, RG, Ferrell, JA, Brecke, BJ (2014) Impact of exposure to 2,4-D and dicamba on peanut injury and yield. Weed Technol 28:465–470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurdy, JD, McElroy, JS, Flessner, ML (2013) Differential response of four Trifolium species to common broadleaf herbicides: implications for mixed grass-legume swards. Weed Technol 27:123–128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurdy, JD, McElroy, JS, Flessner, ML, Hoyle, JA, Parker, ET (2016) Tolerance of three clovers (Trifolium spp.) to common herbicides. Weed Technol 30:478–485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, P, Williams, MJ, Blount, AS, Quesenberry, KH (2007) Influence of harvest management on rhizoma perennial peanut production, nutritive value, and persistence on flatwood soils. Forage Grazinglands. doi: 10.1094/FG-2007-1108-01-RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuton, TC, Mail, CL, MacDonald, GE, Ducar, JT, Brecke, BJ (2004) Green peanut tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 18:719–722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencia, E, Williams, MJ, Sollenberger, LE (1999) Yield and botanical composition of rhizoma peanut-grass swards treated with herbicides. Agron J 91:956–961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendramini, JM (2010) Forage evaluation and quality in Florida. Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Florida Ruminant Nutrition. Gainesville, Florida, February 2010Google Scholar
Vendramini, JM, Kretschmer, AE Jr (2013) Florida Carpon Desmodium. Florida Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin SS-AGR-112. Gainesville: University of Florida Google Scholar
Vendramini, JM, Silveira, ML (2016) Aeschynomene. Florida Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin SS-AGR-61. Gainesville: University of Florida Google Scholar
Villarreal, M, Cochran, RC, Villalobos, L, Roja-Bourrillon, A, Rodriguez, R, Wickersham, TA (2005) Dry-matter yields and crude protein and rumen-degradable protein concentrations of three Arachis pintoi ecotypes at different stages of regrowth in the humid tropics. Grass Forage Sci 60:237–243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar