Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:18:56.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-of-day effect on weed control efficacy with tolpyralate plus atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2020

Nicole M. Langdon ,
Nader Soltani Open the ORCID record for Nader Soltani [Opens in a new window] ,
Alan J. Raedar ,
David C. Hooker ,
Darren E. Robinson  and
Peter H. Sikkema
Nicole M. Langdon
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Alan J. Raedar
Affiliation:
Herbicide Field Development and Technical Service Representative, ISK Biosciences Inc., Concord, OH, USA
David C. Hooker
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Nader Soltani, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, ON, CanadaN0P 2C0. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tolpyralate is a new 4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)–inhibiting herbicide for weed control in corn. Previous research has reported efficacy of tolpyralate + atrazine on several annual grass and broadleaf weed species; however, no studies have evaluated weed control of tolpyralate + atrazine depending on time-of-day (TOD) of application. Six field experiments were conducted over a 2-yr period (2018, 2019) near Ridgetown, ON, to determine if there is an effect of TOD of application on tolpyralate + atrazine efficacy on common annual grass and broadleaf weeds. An application was made at 3-h intervals beginning at 06:00 h with the last application at 24:00 h. There was a slight TOD effect on velvetleaf, pigweed species, and common ragweed control with tolpyralate + atrazine; however, the magnitude of change throughout the day was ≤3% at 2, 4, or 8 wk after application (WAA). There was no effect of TOD of tolpyralate + atrazine on the control of lambsquarters, barnyardgrass, and green foxtail. All weed species were controlled ≥88% at 8 WAA. There was no effect of TOD of tolpyralate + atrazine application on corn yield. Results of this study show no evidence of a TOD effect on weed control efficacy with tolpyralate + atrazine.

Keywords

AtrazinetolpyralatebarnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.common ragweedAmbrosia artemisiifolia L.green foxtailSetaria viridis (L.) P. Beauvhemp sesbaniaSesbania herbacea (Mill.) McVaughlambsquartersChenopodium album L.redroot pigweedAmaranthus retroflexus L.sicklepodSenna obtusifolia (L.) H.S. Irwin & BarnebyvelvetleafAbutilon theophrasti Medik.cornZea mays L.Crop injurydensitysensitivityyield
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Aaron Hager, University of Illinois

References

Andersen, RN, Koukkari, WL (1978) Response of velvetleaf (Abutilon theoprasti) to bentazon as affected by leaf orientation. Weed Sci 26:393–395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Swanton, CJ, Hall, JC, Mersey, BG (1993) The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res 2:139–147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2019) SHIELDEX® 400SC Herbicide Label. Concord, OH: ISK Biosciences Corp.Google Scholar
Budd, CM, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Miller, RT, Sikkema, PH (2017) Efficacy of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) as affected by height, density, and time of day. Weed Sci 65:275–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, K, Loughin, TM (2001) Glufosinate efficacy, absorption, and translocation in amaranth as affected by relative humidity and temperature. Weed Sci 49:8–13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, DL, Andersen, RN (1976) Effectiveness of bentazon applied at various times of the day. Weed Sci 24:567–570 10.1017/S0043174500062950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausey, JC, Renner, KA (2001) Environmental effects on CGA-248757 and flumiclorac efficacy/soybean tolerance. Weed Sci 49:668–674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, GH, Wall, DA (1991) Effect of application factors on efficacy of fluazifop-P-butyl in flax. Weed Technol 5:504–508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, DF, Falk, RH (1990) Herbicide deposition on leaf surfaces. Weed Sci 38:280–288 10.1017/S004317450005654XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B, Young, B (2002) Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the foliar activity of mesotrione. Weed Sci 50:157–161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraatz, GW, Andersen, RN (1980) Leaf movements in sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) in relation to herbicide response. Weed Sci 28:551–556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SD, Oliver, LR (1982) Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci 30:520–526 10.1017/S0043174500041096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinson, KB, Durgan, BR, Gunsolus, JL, Sothern, RB (2005) Time of day of application effect on glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy. Crop Management Res 4:1–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinson, KB, Koukkari, WL, Durgan, BR, Gunsolus, JL (2002) Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate. Chronobiol Int 19:405–422 10.1081/CBI-120002877CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, BA, Soltani, N, Raeder, AJ, Hooker, DC, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2018a) Tolpyralate efficacy: Part 1. Biologically effective dose of tolpyralate for control of annual grass and broadleaf weeds in corn. Weed Technol 32:698–706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, BA, Soltani, N, Raeder, AJ, Hooker, DC, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2018b) Tolpyralate efficacy: Part 2. Comparison of three group 27 herbicides applied POST for annual grass and broadleaf weed control in corn. Weed Technol 32:707–713 10.1017/wet.2018.81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, RP, Martinson, KB, Sothern, RB, Durgan, BR, Gunsolus, JL (2003) Circadian response of annual weeds in a natural setting to high and low application rates of four herbicides with different modes of action. Chronobiol Int 20:299–324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, K, Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ (2007) Application time of day influences glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol 21:7–13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliver, LR, Purcell, LC (1999) Diurnal leaf movement effects on spray interception and glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol 13:466–470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallas, JE (1960) Effects of temperature and humidity on foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and benzoic acid. Plant Physiol 35:575–580 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, R, Foy, CL, Crafts, AS (1967) Effects of relative humidity on absorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 2:149–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG (2003) Diurnal fluctuations and leaf angle reduce glufosinate efficacy. Weed Technol 17:302–306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, CL, Nurse, RE, Sikkema, PH (2009) Time of day impacts postemergence weed control in corn. Weed Technol 23:346–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopps, GJ, Nurse, RE, Sikkema, PH (2013) The effect of time of day on the activity of postemergence soybean herbicides. Weed Technol 27:690–695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, AL, Martin, AR, Roeth, FW, Lindquist, JL (2004) Glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf varies with application time of day. Weed Technol 18:931–939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar