Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:37:19.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soybean (Glycine max) and Rotational Crop Tolerance to Chlorimuron, Clomazone, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald F. Krausz
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., So. Ill. Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., So. Ill. Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Ellery L. Knake
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ill., Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Tolerances of soybean and rotational crops wheat and corn to chlorimuron (0.02 to 0.14 kg ai ha–1), clomazone (0.56 to 3.36 kg ha–1), imazaquin (0.07 to 0.42 kg ha–1) and imazethapyr (0.05 to 0.31 kg ha–1) were evaluated in field studies. No visible soybean injury was observed. No reduction in soybean population, height, or yield occurred from the use of these herbicides, in 1986 or 1987. Differences in wheat yields among treatments were not significant in 1987 or 1988. Corn population, number of ears, ear weight, or yield were not different.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Basham, G. W., and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:860870.Google Scholar
2. Burns, R. G. 1975. Factors affecting pesticide loss from soil. p. 103141 in Paul, E. A. and McLoren, A. D., eds. Soil Biochemistry. Vol. 4. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
3. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Biodegradation characteristics of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 37:815819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Curran, W. S., and Knake, E. L. 1987. Rotational crop injury potential for corn following clomazone, imazaquin, imazethapyr, and chlorimuron in Illinois. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 44:170172.Google Scholar
5. Fredrickson, D. R., and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:328332.Google Scholar
6. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mills, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till doublecrop soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353359.Google Scholar
8. Peterson, M. A., and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:9095.Google Scholar
10. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity of corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:7883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Stevenson, F. J. 1972. Organic matter reactions involving herbicides in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1:333343.Google Scholar
12. Talbert, R., Tripp, T., Lavy, T., Kendig, A., Johnson, D., Ernest, L., and Barnes, J. 1989. Winter wheat response to carryover from herbicides used on corn, cotton, grain sorghum, and soybeans. Univ. Ark. Res. Serv. 377:1527.Google Scholar
13. Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558563.Google Scholar
14. Zimdahl, R. L., and Gwynn, S. M. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci. 25:247251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar