Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:03:29.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sand Sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia) and Brittle Pricklypear (Opuntia fragilis) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert G. Wilson
Robert G. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebr., Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted at Bridgeport, NE, during 1983 through 1987 to select alternatives for silvex and 2,4,5-T for sand sagebrush and brittle pricklypear control. Of the six herbicides examined, the butoxyethyl ester of 2,4-D at 2.2 kg ae/ha was equivalent to the propylene glycol butyl ether ester of silvex or 2,4,5-T for sand sagebrush control. The potassium salt of picloram at 0.3 kg ae/ha was equal to silvex for brittle pricklypear control.

Keywords

Picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidsilvex, 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid2,4,5-T, (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acidsand sagebrush, Artemisia filifolia Torr. #3 ARTFIbrittle pricklypear, Opuntia fragilis (Nutt.)Haw. # OPUFRRangelandpicloram2,4-D
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 272 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. 1964. Aerial application of herbicides for control of sand sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 17:253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Britton, C. M., and Sneva, F. A. 1983. Big sagebrush control with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 36:707–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Clary, W. R., Goodrich, S., and Smith, B. M. 1985. Response to tebuthiuron by Utah juniper and mountain big sagebrush communities. J. Range Manage. 38:56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Costello, D. F. 1941. Pricklypear control on short-grass range in the central Great Plains. U.S. Dep. Agric. Leaflet No. 210.Google Scholar
5. Jones, V. E., and Pettit, R. D. 1982. Tebuthiuron controls sand shinnery oak and sand sagebrush. Abstr. Papers, Annu. Meeting. Soc. Range Manage. 35:20.Google Scholar
6. McDaniel, K. C., and Balliette, J. F. 1986. Control of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) with pelleted tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 34:276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mueggler, W. F., and Blaisdell, J. P. 1958. Effects on associated species of burning, rotobeating, spraying, and railing sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 11:61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1979. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Whitson, T. D., and Alley, H. P. 1984. Tebuthiuron effects on Artemisia spp. and associated grasses. Weed Sci. 32:180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wicks, G. A., Fenster, C. R., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Selective control of plains pricklypear in rangeland with herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar