Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:15:29.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Assessment of Weed Resistance in the Canadian Prairies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
Julia Y. Leeson ,
A. Gordon Thomas ,
Linda M. Hall  and
Clark A. Brenzil
Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Julia Y. Leeson
Affiliation:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
A. Gordon Thomas
Affiliation:
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Clark A. Brenzil
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0B1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agricultural practices, other than herbicide use, can affect the rate of evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. This study examined associations of farm management practices with the occurrence of herbicide (acetyl-CoA carboxylase or acetolactate synthase inhibitor)-resistant weeds, based upon a multi-year (2001 to 2003) random survey of 370 fields/growers from the Canadian Prairies. Herbicide-resistant weeds occurred in one-quarter of the surveyed fields. The primary herbicide-resistant weed species was wild oat, with lesser occurrence of green foxtail, kochia, common chickweed, spiny sowthistle, and redroot pigweed. The risk of weed resistance was greatest in fields with cereal-based rotations and least in fields with forage crops, fallow, or where three or more crop types were grown. Weed resistance risk also was greatest in conservation-tillage systems and particularly low soil disturbance no-tillage, possibly due to greater herbicide use or weed seed bank turnover. Large farms (> 400 ha) had a greater risk of weed resistance than smaller farms, although the reason for this association was unclear. The results of this study identify cropping system diversity as the foundation of proactive weed resistance management.

Keywords

Common chickweed, Stellaria media (L.) Vill. STEMEgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVIkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. KSHSCredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREspiny sowthistle, Sonchus asper (L.) Hill SONASwild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAACCase inhibitorALS inhibitorcropping system diversityherbicide resistanceresistance managementsurvey
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 741 - 746
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, D. D., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 1996. Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:570–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20:793–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2007. Beneficial management practices to combat herbicide-resistant grass weeds in the Northern Great Plains. Weed Technol 21:290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Hall, L. M., Meers, S., Laslo, J. J., and Stevenson, F. C. 2004. Management practices influencing herbicide resistance in wild oat. Weed Technol 18:853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., Hall, L. M., Holzgang, G., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2008. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol 22:530–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Morrison, I. N., and Kelner, D. 1997. Field and grower survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci 77:709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haak, D. 2003. Crop residue levels and seeding systems in Saskatchewan. Results of a PFRA survey, 1997–2002. http://www.agr.gc.ca/pfra/sk/seeding_e.htm. Accessed: April 20, 2008.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Kirkland, K. J., Baron, V. S., and Clayton, G. W. 2003. Early-harvest barley (Hordeum vulgare) silage reduces wild oat (Avena fatua) densities under zero tillage. Weed Technol 17:102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. M., Murray, B. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci 41:232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jana, S. and Thai, K. M. 1987. Patterns of changes of dormant genotypes in Avena fatua populations under different agricultural conditions. Can. J. Bot 65:1741–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, J. Y. and Thomas, A. G. 2008. Impacts of direct seeding—weed dynamics. Indian Head, SK. Proceedings of the 2008 Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association Annual Conference: Fuelling the Farm (in press).Google Scholar
Légère, A., Beckie, H. J., Stevenson, F. C., and Thomas, A. G. 2000. Survey of management practices affecting the occurrence of wild oat (Avena fatua) resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Technol 14:366–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M. and Mohler, C. L. 2001. Weeds and the soil environment. Pages 210–268. in Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P., editors. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, I. N., Todd, B. G., and Nawolsky, K. M. 1989. Confirmation of trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in Manitoba. Weed Technol 3:544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, S. R. 2002. Herbicide-resistant weeds. Pages 225–252. in Naylor, R. E. L., editor. Weed Management Handbook. British Crop Protection Council. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazarko, O. M., Van Acker, R. C., and Entz, M. H. 2005. Strategies and tactics for herbicide use reduction in field crops in Canada: a review. Can. J. Plant Sci 85:457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Blackshaw, R. E., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., Moyer, J. R., Dosdall, L. M., Maurice, D. C., and Turkington, T. K. 2007. Integrated approaches to managing weeds in spring-sown crops in western Canada. Crop Prot 26:390–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ominski, P. D., Entz, M. H., and Kenkel, N. 1999. Weed suppression by Medicago sativa in subsequent cereal crops: a comparative survey. Weed Sci 47:282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1,243.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada 2007. Census of Agriculture 2006. http://www.statcan.ca/english/agcensus2006/index.htm. Accessed: April 21, 2008.Google Scholar
Stephenson, G. R., Dykstra, M. D., McLaren, R. D., and Hamill, A. S. 1990. Agronomic practices influencing triazine-resistant weed distribution in Ontario. Weed Technol 4:199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Derksen, D. A., Blackshaw, R. E., Van Acker, R. C., Légère, A., Watson, P. R., and Turnbull, G. C. 2004. A multistudy approach to understanding weed population shifts in medium-to long-term tillage systems. Weed Sci 52:874–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Leeson, J. Y., Beckie, H. J., and Légère, A. 1999. Identification of farm management systems at risk for ACCase inhibitor-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 39:33.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Weaver, S. E., and Hamill, A. S. 2000. Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled rates. Weed Technol 14:106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar