Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:29:46.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of Potato (Solanum tuberosum), Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), and Several Weeds to ASC-67040 Herbicide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Horticulture Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Robert J. Mills
Affiliation:
Horticulture Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

The experimental sulfonylurea herbicide ASC-67040 was evaluated preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) at 25 to 100 g ai/ha and PRE at 50 g/ha followed by ASC-67040 POST at 50 g/ha for broadleaf weed control in potato and tomato. In Virginia, ASC-67040 POST at 50 and 100 g/ha gave 70 to 98% control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and jimsonweed with slight (0 to 6%) ‘Superior’ potato and moderate (0 to 23%) ‘Agriset’ tomato injury. This crop injury was present primarily as chlorosis in terminal growth and disappeared by 3 wk after treatment (WAT). Potato tuber and tomato fruit yields were high in ASC-67040-treated plots. In North Carolina, ASC-67040 PRE and POST at 50 and 100 g/ha controlled 10 species of annual broadleaf weeds and grasses, and at 25 g/ha ASC-67040 gave greater than 90% control of most species. ASC-67040 injured ‘Fontenot’ potato more than Superior and caused 10 to 13% injury to ‘Mountain Spring’ tomato but did not injure ‘Mountain Pride’ tomato. Mountain Spring tomato recovered rapidly and produced high yields. In the greenhouse, yellow nutsedge control by ASC-67040 POST at 25 to 100 g/ha was 59 to 86% 3 WAT and yellow nutsedge height, dry weight, and regrowth dry weight were reduced by all rates. Lower rates of ASC-67040 might control weeds and cause less injury to potato and tomato.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996a. Weed management programs in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 10: 354358.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996b. Efficacy of rimsulfuron and metribuzin in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 10: 475480.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996c. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculents) control POST with acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 10: 576580.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1997. Rimsulfuron and metribuzin efficacy in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicum esculentus). Weed Technol. 11: 324328.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1991. United States standards for grades of potatoes. F. R. Doc. 91-4381. 7 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Lexone product label. Wilmington, DE: E. I. Dupont de Nemours and Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Bewick, T. A., Smith, K. E., Stall, W. M., and Olsen, S. M. 1995. Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentus) cultivar and weed sensitivity to DPX-E9636. Weed Technol. 9: 499503.Google Scholar
Dallyn, S. L. 1971. Weed control methods in potatoes. Am. Potato J. 48: 116128.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8: 428435.Google Scholar
Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1984. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 32: 442444.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Easton, E. F. 1993. Weed control and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to nicosulfuron and bentazon alone and in mixture. Weed Sci. 41: 615620.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Monaco, T. J. 1996. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance and susceptibility of eight weeds to rimsulfuron with and without metribuzin. Weed Technol. 10: 2934.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Waterfield, R. L., and Savage, C. P. 1970. Field investigations of the activities of several herbicides for control of yellow nutsedge. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34: 255262.Google Scholar