Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:13:34.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Rotational Crops to BAY MKH 6561

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Curtis R. Rainbolt ,
Donald C. Thill  and
Daniel A. Ball
Curtis R. Rainbolt*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844–2339
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844–2339
Daniel A. Ball
Affiliation:
Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR 97801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

BAY MKH 6561, a sulfonylaminocarbonyl-triazolinone herbicide for postemergence control of annual grasses and selected broadleaf weeds in wheat, was evaluated for weed control and rotational crop (barley, pea, lentil, and mustard) injury in the Pacific Northwest. BAY MKH 6561 was applied postemergence in winter wheat at 22, 45, and 90 g ai/ha during fall 1997 and spring 1998 near Moscow, ID, Pendleton, OR, and Wilcox, WA, to determine its effect on barley, pea, lentil, and mustard planted during spring 1999. At Pendleton, BAY MKH 6561 reduced barley height 6% and grain yield 11%, when applied in the spring at 90 g/ha, and visibly injured mustard 4 to 19% when applied at 45 or 90 g/ha. All BAY MKH 6561 treatments reduced mustard seed yield 47 to 54% at Moscow and 38 to 48% at Wilcox. Pea and lentil seed yields were not affected by herbicide treatments at all locations, whereas barley was not affected at Moscow and Wilcox. In growth chamber soil bioassay experiments, fall-applied BAY MKH 6561 dissipated 10 to 48% faster at Moscow compared to Pendleton, and the predicted half-life ranged from about 68 (Moscow) to 79 d (Pendleton). Dissipation of spring-applied BAY MKH 6561 at 45 and 90 g/ha was 17 to 21% slower at Moscow than Wilcox, and the predicted half-life ranged from 60 (Wilcox) to 69 d (Moscow).

Keywords

BAY MKH 6561, methyl 2-({[(4-methyl-5-oxo-3-propoxy-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1- l)carbonyl]amino}sulfonyl)benzoate sodium saltbarley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Baronesse’lentil, Lens culinaris Medic. ‘Pardina’mustard, Sinapsis alba L. ‘Tilney’pea, Pisum sativum L. ‘Columbia’winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Cashup’, ‘Madsen’, ‘Stephens’Corn root bioassaydissipationMON 37500pHprecipitationsoil temperaturesoil residuesyieldDAT, days after treatmentOM, organic matterPNW, Pacific NorthwestPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporated
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 365 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Sayagh, K. F. 1998. Procarbazone-Sodium Effect on Rotational Crops and its Dissipation. . Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Morrow, L. A. 1990. The Pacific Northwest. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 201–231.Google Scholar
Barberi, P., Silvestri, N., and Bonari, E. 1997. Weed communities of winter wheat as influenced by input level and rotation. Weed Res. 37: 301–313.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. and McKercher, R. B. 1990. Mobility of two sulfonylurea herbicides in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38: 315–319.Google Scholar
Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31: 861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. M., Joshi, M. M., and Van, A. 1987. Rapid soil microbial degradation of DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 27:75.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J. and Veseth, R. J. 1991. Limiting effects of pests and diseases. Chapter 4. In Wheat Health Management. St. Paul, MN: The American Phtyopathological Society. pp. 41–60.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Liebl, R. A., and Simmons, F. W. 1992. Effects of tillage and application method on clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr persistence. Weed Sci. 40: 482–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feucht, D., Muller, K. H., Wellman, A., and Santel, H. 1999. BAY MKH 6561—a new selective herbicide for grass control in wheat, rye, and triticale. Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. Conf. Weeds. 1: 53–58.Google Scholar
Frederickson, D. R. and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34: 328–332.Google Scholar
Hamaker, J. W. 1972. Decomposition: quantitative aspects. In Goring, C.A.I. and Hamaker, J. W., eds. Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Volume 1. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 252–334.Google Scholar
Hurle, K. and Walker, A. 1980. Persistence and its prediction. Chapter 4. In Hance, R. J., ed. Interactions Between Herbicides and the Soil. New York: Academic Press. pp. 83–122.Google Scholar
Joshi, M. M., Brown, H. M., and Romesser, J. A. 1985. Degradation of chlorsulfuron by soil microorganisms. Weed Sci. 33: 888–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, R. W., Condron, L. M., Main, B. E., and Dastgheib, F. 1997. Dissipation of imazapyr, flumetsulam and thifensulfuron in soil. Weed Res. 37: 381–389.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. 1995. Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops. Weed Technol. 9: 373–379.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Esau, R., and Kozub, G. C. 1990. Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of nine rotational crops in alkaline soils of southern Alberta. Weed Technol. 4: 543–548.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Services. 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Government Printing Office. I–6 p.Google Scholar
Nord-Christerson, M. and Bergstrom, L. 1989. Field observation of soil movement and residues of sulfonylureas in Sweden. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 3: 1127–1132.Google Scholar
Rydrych, D. J. and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60: 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS/STAT® User's Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 582 p.Google Scholar
Scoggan, A., Santel, H. J., and Wollam, J. 1999. Control of annual grass weeds in winter wheat with BAY MKH 6561 in the USA. Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. Conf. Weeds. 1: 93–98.Google Scholar
Shea, P. J. 1985. Detoxification of herbicide residues in soil. Weed Sci. 33 (Suppl. 2): 33–41.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L., Thill, D. C., Price, W. J., and Ball, D. A. 1998. Response of downy brome and rotational crops to MON 37500. Weed Technol. 12: 690–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, S. L., Santelman, P. W., and Baughman, T. A. 1991. A rapid, sensitive soil bioassay for sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 39: 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K. and Banks, P. A. 1994. Dissipation of chlorimuron in southern soils. Weed Sci. 42: 625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voos, G. and Groffman, P. M. 1997. Relationships between microbial biomass and dissipation of 2,4-D and dicamba in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 24: 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2: 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L., Cranmer, B. K., and Stroup, W. W. 1994. Use of empirical equations to describe dissipation of metribuzin and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 42: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar