Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:31:42.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Four Turfgrass Species to Ethofumesate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph W. Meyer  and
Bruce E. Branham
Joseph W. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
Bruce E. Branham*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, 1102 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Annual bluegrass and roughstalk bluegrass are turfgrasses, but they can also be two of the most serious weed problems in highly maintained turfgrass. Ethofumesate has been used to control annual bluegrass; however, the results have been erratic, and ethofumesate is not widely utilized for annual bluegrass control in turfgrass. The objective of this research was to characterize the response of annual, roughstalk, and Kentucky bluegrasses and creeping bentgrass to a range of ethofumesate rates. Single applications of ethofumesate from 3.4 to 20.2 kg ai/ha were made to all four species during May of 1999 to 2001. All four species were injured from rates of ≥6.7 kg/ha. Roughstalk bluegrass was most injured by a single ethofumesate application. Percent roughstalk bluegrass control increased linearly with rate, and greater than 85% control was observed for rates of ≥16.8 kg/ha. In contrast, annual bluegrass showed almost no control, with rates ≤10.2 kg/ha, and the highest rate tested, 20.2 kg/ha, controlled only 47 to 62% of the annual bluegrass. Kentucky bluegrass was the least sensitive bluegrass species, with a maximum control of 3 to 15% from 20.2 kg/ha of ethofumesate. Creeping bentgrass was the least sensitive of the species tested, with low levels of control regardless of rate. During 3 yr of testing, maximum control of bentgrass from any rate was 4%. Single, high-rate applications of ethofumesate hold promise to control roughstalk bluegrass in creeping bentgrass turf. Sixteen Kentucky bluegrass cultivars used for low-cut athletic fields were evaluated for their tolerance to sequential ethofumesate applications during 1999 and 2002. The cultivars showed significant differences in ethofumesate tolerance, with ‘Moonlight’ and ‘America’ never showing any injury to sequential ethofumesate applications, while ‘Northstar’ and ‘Total Eclipse’ were severely injured.

Keywords

Ethofumesate, annual bluegrass, Poa annua L. #3 POAANroughstalk bluegrass, Poa trivialis L. #POATR ‘Laser’Kentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis L. #POAPR ‘Northstar,’ ‘Total Eclipse,’ ‘Limosine,’ ‘Explorer,’ ‘ZPS 309,’ ‘Rambo,’ ‘Rugby II,’ ‘SR2000,’ ‘Ram1,’ ‘Wildwood,’ ‘Odyssey,’ ‘Absolute,’ ‘SR 2109,’ ‘America,’ ‘Moonlight,’ ‘Gnome,’ ‘Glade,’ ‘Nustar,’ and ‘Baron’creeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera L. #AGSST ‘Penneagle,’ ‘SR 1020,’ ‘SR 1019,’ and ‘Providence,’Field studytolerancepostemergence grass controlWATweeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 123 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abulnaja, K. O., Tighe, C. R., and Harwood, J. L. 1992. Inhibition of fatty-acid elongation provides a basis for the action of the herbicide, ethofumesate, on surface wax formation. Phytochemistry 31:1155–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. C. 1989. Control of Poa annua in cool season turf with ethofumesate. in Takatoh, H., ed. Proceedings of the 6th International Turfgrass Research Conference. Tokyo. Pp. 19–20.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Prograss Specimen Label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer Environmental Science.Google Scholar
Bell, G. E., Odorizzi, E., and Danneberger, T. K. 1999. Reducing populations of annual bluegrass and roughstalk bluegrass in creeping bentgrass fairways: a nutritional approach. Weed Technol. 13:829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, L. M. and McDonald, E. R. 1992. Effectiveness of bensulide in controlling two annual bluegrass (Poa annua) subspecies. Weed Technol. 6:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, G. E. and Krans, J. V. 1986. Evaluation of ethofumesate for annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control and turfgrass tolerance. Weed Sci. 34:930–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dernoeden, P. H. 2000. Tolerance of four festuca species to ethofumesate and prodiamine. Hortic. Sci. 35:1170–1173.Google Scholar
Dernoeden, P. H. and Turner, T. R. 1988. Annual bluegrass control and tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass and perennial ryegrass to ethofumesate. Hortic. Sci. 23:565–567.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. S. and Branham, B. E. 2001. Mobility and dissipation of ethofumesate and halofenozide in turfgrass and bare soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2894–2898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggar, R. J. and Passman, A. 1981. Soil persistence and distribution of ethofumesate applied to autumn-sown perennial ryegrass for Poa annua control. Weed Res. 21:153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1983. Response to ethofumesate of annual bluegrass (Poa annua) and overseeded bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 31:385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J., Landry, G. W. Jr., and Karnok, K. J. 1989. Tolerance of bentgrass to amount, frequency, and timing of ethofumesate applications. Hortic. Sci. 24:102–104.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. G., Ruemmele, B. A., Velguth, P., White, D. B., and Ascher, P. D. 1993. An overview of Poa annua L. reproductive biology. Int. Turf. Soc. Res. J. 7:798–804.Google Scholar
Jukes, A. M. and Goode, P. M. 1981. Observations on the effect of post-emergence application of ethofumesate on the shoot growth of Poa annua and Lolium perenne seedlings. Grass Forage Sci. 36:231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, E. A. and Branham, B. E. 2002. Site of uptake, translocation, and metabolism of ethofumesate in three turfgrass species. Weed Sci. 50:576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W. O. 1977. Winter annual grass weed control in Italian ryegrass with ethofumesate. Weed Sci. 25:252–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. 1998. Poa trivialis contamination: an increase in testing standards would benefit superintendents. USGA Green Section Rec. 36:13–14.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. M. and DiPaola, J. M. 1989. Ethofumesate for Poa annua control in bentgrass. in Takatoh, H., ed. Proceedings of the 6th International Turfgrass Research Conference. Tokyo. Pp. 303–305.Google Scholar
Lush, W. M. 1988. Biology of Poa annua in a temperate zone golf putting green (Agrostis stolonifera/Poa annua) II. The seed bank. J. Appl. Ecol. 25:989–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. K. 1969. The biological properties of 2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulphonate (NC 8438)—A new experimental herbicide. in Proceeding of the 3rd Symposium on New Herbicides. Wageningen, The Netherlands: European Weed Research Council. Pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Pioppi, A. 2004. Embracing Poa: if you can't beat it, you may as well take care of it. Golfdom 60:20–21.Google Scholar
Rossi, F. S. 2001. Annual bluegrass population dynamics in response to growth regulators and herbicides. in Carey, K., ed. Proceedings of the 9th International Turfgrass Research Conference. Toronto. Pp. 906–909.Google Scholar
Shearman, R. C. 1986. Kentucky bluegrass and annual bluegrass responses to ethofumesate. Hortic. Sci. 21:1157–1159.Google Scholar
Vencil, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar