Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:18:30.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Double-Crop Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max) to Broadleaf Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald F. Krausz  and
Bryan G. Young
Ronald F. Krausz*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and General Agriculture, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1997 to 1999 to evaluate the influence of broadleaf herbicides on double-crop glyphosate-resistant soybean injury and yield at Belleville, IL. Diphenylether herbicides applied postemergence (POST) caused 10 to 48% necrosis 7 days after treatment (DAT). POST herbicides caused 0 to 8%, 8 to 37%, and 0 to 12% height reduction 7 DAT in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. In most instances, diphenylether herbicides did not delay soybean maturity, whereas imazethapyr applied POST delayed soybean maturity in 1998 and 1999. Acifluorfen plus bentazon reduced soybean height at maturity in 1997 and 1998, whereas lactofen, imazethapyr, and imazamox reduced height only in 1998. Diphenylether herbicides did not reduce grain yield when compared to the no-herbicide hand-weeded treatment, but imazamox reduced yield by 18%. Furthermore, the soil herbicides applied preemergence and diphenylether herbicides applied POST did not reduce grain yield when compared to glyphosate alone.

Keywords

Acifluorfenbentazonglyphosateimazamoximazethapyrlactofensoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3601 RR’, ‘Asgrow 4501 RR’, and ‘Bergmann-Taylor 369 CR’Herbicide injurypreemergencepostemergenceCGA-248757CGA-277476cloransulamflumicloracfomesafenimazaquinpendimethalinDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 300 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Camper, H. M., Genter, C. F., and Loope, K. E. 1972. Double cropping following winter barley harvest in eastern Virginia. Agron. J. 64: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. A. and Harvey, R. G. 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 569–577.Google Scholar
Darwent, A. L., Kirkland, K. J., Baig, M. N., and Lefkovitch, L. P. 1994. Preharvest applications of glyphosate for canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Technol. 8: 477–482.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with reduced rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37: 365–374.Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1461–1467.Google Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 834–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M. 1999. Effect of nonylphenol ethoxylation on the biological activity of three herbicides with different water solubilities. Weed Technol. 13: 840–842.Google Scholar
Hairston, J. E., Sanford, J. O., Pope, D. F., and Horneck, D. A. 1987. Soybean-wheat doublecropping: implications from straw management and supplemental nitrogen. Agron. J. 79: 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, T. C. and Halvorson, M. A. 1991. Effects of four herbicides on four early maturing soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Technol. 5: 490–492.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G., Jackson, L. A., and Mason, D. S. 1986. Yield response of weed-free soybeans (Glycine max) to injury from postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Sci. 34: 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHarry, M. J. and Kapusta, G. 1979. Herbicide applications in tillered winter wheat for doublecrop soybean weed control. Agron. J. 71: 1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7: 317–321.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 1998. Weed control in wide- and narrow-row soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox, imazethapyr, and CGA-277476 plus quizalofop. Weed Technol. 12: 137–144.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 46: 587–594.Google Scholar
Pike, D. R., McGlamery, M. D., and Knake, E. L. 1991. A case study of herbicide use. Weed Technol. 5: 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, J. O. 1982. Straw and tillage management practices in soybean-wheat double-cropping. Agron. J. 74: 1032–1035.Google Scholar
Sims, B. D. and Guethle, D. R. 1992. Herbicide programs in no-tillage and conventional-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) double cropped after wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 40: 255–263.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Alm, D. M. 1993. Survey results on environmental issues and weed science research priorities within the corn belt. Weed Technol. 7: 763–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stucky, D. J. 1976. Effect of planting depth, temperature, and cultivars on emergence and yield of double cropped soybeans. Agron. J. 68: 291–294.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E., Schabenberger, O., and Kells, J. J. 1999. Response of annual weed species to glufosinate and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 13: 542–547.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1978. Weed control for doublecrop soybeans planted with the no-tillage method following small grain harvest. Agron. J. 70: 577–581.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with lactofen plus chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 7: 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 478–483.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Bryant, K. J., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 586–593.Google Scholar
Wichert, R. A. and Talbert, R. E. 1993. Soybean [Glycine max (L.)] response to lactofen. Weed Sci. 41: 23–26.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci. 36: 648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar