Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:33:35.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides) to Plant Growth Regulators and Frequency of Mowing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Billy J. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ga., Ga. Stn., Griffin, GA 30223-1797

Abstract

When centipedegrass was unmowed, seedhead suppression generally was better with imazethapyr than with mefluidide either alone or with flurprimidol, but these treatments were not effective for 8 weeks. In several instances, imazethapyr at 0.30 kg ai/ha and MH at 2.2 and 4.5 kg ai/ha severely injured (>30%) centipedegrass. Mowing weekly did not control seedhead development effectively, and none of the plant growth regulator plus mowing treatments effectively suppressed seedheads for 12 weeks. To effectively suppress seedhead production for 8 weeks, centipedegrass treated with mefluidide required mowing 3 weeks after treatment, while centipedegrass treated with imazethapyr or flurprimidol plus mefluidide required mowing at 3 and 6 weeks.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhowmik, P. C. 1987. Effects of amidochlor on shoot growth and seedhead suppression in cool-season turfgrass. HortScience 22:6365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Christians, N. E. 1985. Response of Kentucky bluegrass to four growth retardants. J. Am. Hort. Sci. 110:765769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dernoeden, P. H. 1984. Four-year response of a Kentucky bluegrass red fescue turf to plant growth retardants. Agron. J. 76:807813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures in Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
5. Jagschitz, J. A. 1982. Evaluation of growth retardants in cool-season lawn turf. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:334335.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, B. J., and Carrow, R. N. 1987. Reduce centipedegrass decline. Grounds Maint. 22(1):16, 114.Google Scholar
7. Landry, G. 1984. Centipedegrass culture and problems. Ga. Turfgrass Topics 4(5):12.Google Scholar
8. Lewis, W. M., and DiPaola, J. M. 1985. Tolerance of Eremochloa ophiuroides, Paspalum notatum and Festuca arundinacea to herbicides. p. 717725 in Lemaine, F., ed. Proc. Fifth Int. Turfgrass Res. Conf., INRA, France.Google Scholar
9. McCarty, L. B., DiPaola, J. M., Lewis, W. M., and Gilbert, W. B. 1985. Tall fescue response to plant growth retardants and fertilizer sources. Agron. J. 77:476480.Google Scholar
10. Miller, L. C., Miller, R. W., Parks, C. L., and Gorsuch, C. S. 1979. Centipedegrass and its problems. South Carolina Circ. 583.Google Scholar
11. Pennucci, A., and Jagschitz, J. A. 1985. The effect of growth retardants on four lawn grasses. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:260265.Google Scholar
12. SAS Institute. 1982. SAS Users Guide. Cary, N.C. Google Scholar
13. Turner, D. L., and Dickens, R. 1984. Two herbicides effective against bahiagrass in centipedegrass sods. Ala. Highlights 31(3):20.Google Scholar
14. Watschke, T. L. 1981. Effect of four growth retardants on two Kentucky bluegrasses (Poa pratensis L.). Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:322340.Google Scholar
15. Wu, Chu-huang, Meyers, H. R., and Santelmann, P. W. 1976. Chemical retardation of bermudagrass turf. Agron. J. 949952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar