Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:49:40.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rapid Bioassay to Detect Trifluralin-Resistant Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
Lyle F. Friesen ,
Ken M. Nawolsky  and
Ian N. Morrison
Hugh J. Beckie
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB., Canada, R3T 2N2
Lyle F. Friesen
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB., Canada, R3T 2N2
Ken M. Nawolsky
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB., Canada, R3T 2N2
Ian N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB., Canada, R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a petri dish assay, radicle growth of trifluralin-resistant (R) green foxtail exposed to trifluralin concentrations of up to 0.4 ppm (w/v) was not inhibited. Radicle growth of trifluralinsusceptible (S) biotypes was completely inhibited. Shoots were more sensitive to trifluralin than roots, with shoot growth being inhibited for both R and S biotypes at trifluralin concentrations of 0.2 ppm or more. Best discrimination between R and S green foxtail biotypes was achieved by measuring radicle length after incubation of pregerminated caryopses at 0.3 ppm trifluralin in the dark for 5 d at 22 C.

Keywords

Trifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminegreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.)Beauv. ♯3 SETVIHerbicide resistanceSETVI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1983. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America, 5th ed. Champaign, IL. p. 470–476.Google Scholar
2. Appleby, A. P., and Valverde, B. E. 1989. Behavior of dinitroaniline herbicides in plants. Weed Technol. 3:198–206.Google Scholar
3. Brain, P., and Cousens, R. 1989. An equation to describe dose responses where there is stimulation of growth at low doses. Weed Res. 29:93–96.Google Scholar
4. Freund, R. J., and Littell, R. C. 1986. SAS system for regression. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, p. 133–141.Google Scholar
5. Jacques, G. L., and Harvey, R. G. 1974. A simple bioassay technique for dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:93.Google Scholar
6. Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R. Am. Stat. 39:279–285.Google Scholar
7. Lavy, T. L., and Santelmann, P. W. 1986. Herbicide bioassay as a research tool. p. 201–217 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
8. Milthorpe, F. L., and Moorby, J. 1974. An Introduction to Crop Physiology. Cambridge University Press, London, p. 225.Google Scholar
9. Morrison, I. N., Beckie, H. J., and Nawolsky, K. M. 1990. The occurrence of trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in western Canada in Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Proc. 1989 11th Long Ashton Int. Symp., Bristol, U.K. (in press).Google Scholar
10. Morrison, I. N., Todd, B. G., and Nawolsky, K. M. 1989. Confirmation of trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in Manitoba. Weed Technol. 3:544–551.Google Scholar
11. Moss, S. R. 1987. Herbicide resistance in black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds, p. 879–886.Google Scholar
12. Rahman, A., and Ashford, R. 1970. Selective action of trifluralin for control of green foxtail in wheat. Weed Sci. 18:754–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar