Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:12:12.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential yield loss in sugar beet due to weed interference in the United States and Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Nader Soltani*
Affiliation:
Adjunct Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
J. Anita Dille
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Darren E. Robinson
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Michigan, East Lansing, MI, USA
Don W. Morishita
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho, Kimberly, ID, USA
Nevin C. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Scottsbluff, NE, USA
Andrew R. Kniss
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA
Prashant Jha
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Huntley, MT, USA
Joel Felix
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, College of Agricultural Science, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, USA
Robert E. Nurse
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON, Canada
*
*Author for correspondence: Nader Soltani, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada. (E-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

The objective of this WSSA Weed Loss Committee report is to provide quantitative data on the potential yield loss in sugar beet due to weed interference from the major sugar beet growing areas of the United States and Canada. Researchers and extension specialists who conducted research on weed control in sugar beet in the United States and Canada provided quantitative data on sugar beet yield loss due to weed interference in their regions. Specifically, data were requested from weed control studies in sugar beet from up to 10 individual studies per calendar year over a 15-yr period between 2002 and 2017. Data collected indicated that if weeds are left uncontrolled under optimal agronomic practices, growers in Idaho, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ontario, Oregon, and Wyoming would potentially lose an average of 79%, 61%, 66%, 68%, 63%, 75%, 83%, 78%, and 77% of the sugar beet yield. The corresponding monetary loss would be approximately US$234, US$122, US$369, US$43, US$40, US$211, US$12, US$14, and US$32 million, respectively. The average yield loss due to weed interference for the primary sugar beet growing areas of North America was estimated to be 70%. Thus, if weeds are not controlled, growers in the United States would lose approximately 22.4 million tonnes of sugar beet yield valued at approximately US$1.25 billion, and growers in Canada would lose approximately 0.5 million tonnes of sugar beet yield valued at approximately US$25 million. The high return on investment in weed management highlights the importance of continued weed science research for sustaining high crop yield and profitability of sugar beet production in North America.

Type
Education/Extension
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2009) Agribusiness Handbook: Sugar Beet White Sugar. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations. http://www.eastagri.org/publications/pub_docs/4_Sugar_web.pdf. Accessed: June 11, 2018Google Scholar
Bridges, DC (1992) Crop Losses Due to Weeds in Canada and United States. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society America Weed Loss Committee. 403 pGoogle Scholar
Brimhall, PB, Chamberlain, EW, Alley, HP (1965) Competition of annual weeds and sugar beets. Weeds 13:3335 Google Scholar
Canadian Sugar Institute (2015) World Sugar Market and Trade. http://sugar.ca/International-Trade/Global-Sugar-Trade-(WTO).aspx. Accessed: June 11, 2018Google Scholar
Chandler, JM, Hamill, AS, Thomas, AG (1984) Crop Losses Due to Weeds in Canada and the United States. WSSA Special Publication. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society America Weed Loss Committee. 22 pGoogle Scholar
Cramer, HH (1967) Plant protection and world crop production. Bayer Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten 20:1524 Google Scholar
Dawson, JH (1965) Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245249 Google Scholar
Draycott, AP, ed (2008) Introduction. Pages 18 in World Agriculture Series: Sugar Beet. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Google Scholar
Herman, RA, Raybould, A (2014) Expert opinion vs. empirical evidence: the precautionary principle applied to GM crops. GM Crops Food 5:810 Google Scholar
[ISAAA] International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (2011) Executive Summary: 2011 Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/executivesummary/default.asp. Accessed: June 11, 2018Google Scholar
Jursík, M, Holec, J, Soukup, J, Venclová, V (2008) Competitive relationships between sugar beet and weeds in dependence on time of weed control. Plant Soil Environ 54:108116 Google Scholar
Schweizer, EE (1983) Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 31:58 Google Scholar
Schweizer, EE, Bridge, LD (1982) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 30:514519 Google Scholar
Schweizer, EE, Dexter, AG (1987) Weed control in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) in North America. Weed Sci 3:113133 Google Scholar
Schweizer, EE, Lauridson, (1985) Powell Amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) interference in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci 33:518520 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Burke, IC, Everman, WJ, VanGessel, MJ, Davis, VM, Sikkema, PH (2016) Potential corn yield losses from weeds in North America. Weed Technol 30:979984 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Burke, IC, Everman, WJ, VanGessel, MJ, Davis, VM, Sikkema, PH (2017) Perspectives on potential soybean yield losses from weeds in North America. Weed Technol 31:1481115 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Gulden, R, Sprague, C, Zollinger, R, Morishita, DW, Lawrence, NC, Sbatella, GM, Kniss, AR, Jha, P, Sikkema, PH (2018) Potential yield loss in dry bean crops due to weeds in the United States and Canada. Weed Technol 32:342346 Google Scholar
Statista (2018) Volume of Sugar Beet Produced in Canada from 2010 to 2015 (in 1,000 metric tons). https://www.statista.com/statistics/444071/sugar-beet-production-canada. Accessed: June 11, 2018Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Harker, KN, Anderson, RL (1993) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol 7:537542 Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2017) Sugar Beets. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/A_to_Z/in-sugarbeets.php. Accessed: June 11, 2018Google Scholar
Wicks, GA, Wilson, RG (1983) Control of weeds in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) with hand hoeing and herbicides. Weed Sci 31:493499 Google Scholar
Zimdahl, RL, Fertig, SN (1967) Influence of weed competition on sugar beets. Weeds 15:336339 Google Scholar