Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:59:38.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential for Clomazone Use in Rice (Oryza Sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Ford L. Baldwin  and
Tomilea L. Dillon
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Southeast Research and Extension Center, Monticello, AR 71656
Ford L. Baldwin
Affiliation:
Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock, AR 72203
Tomilea L. Dillon
Affiliation:
Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock, AR 72203
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clomazone was applied preplant incorporated, preemergence, delayed preemergence, or postemergence and compared to pendimethalin, quinclorac, and thiobencarb for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Seven days after the clomazone postemergence application, all clomazone treatments except those applied postemergence controlled barnyardgrass ≥ 86%. At 49 d after the postemergence application, control of barnyardgrass with 0.56 and 0.67 kg/ha clomazone postemergence improved to 92 and 93%, respectively. Clomazone and quinclorac applied delayed preemergence generally controlled barnyardgrass less than 70%. Visible injury to rice was ≤ 18% 7 d after emergence and had declined to less than 10% when evaluated 7 d after postemergence treatments. Rice yields were higher with all treatments compared to the nontreated control.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2-[(chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonependimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminequinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acidthiobencarb, S-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]diethylcarbamothioate, barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #ECHCGrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Lemont.’PendimethalinquincloracthiobencarbEchinochloa crus-galliDAE, days after emergenceDAPOST, days after postemergenceDPRE, delayed preemergenceEC, emulsifiable concentrateME, microencapsulatedPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergencePTO, power takeoff
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 390 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Published with the permission of the Director of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Fayetteville, AR 72701.

Current address of first author: Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Beaty, J. D., Guy, C. B., Smith, R. J. Jr., Talbert, R. E., and Johnson, D. H. 1991. Simulated carryover of rotational crop herbicides to rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:122.Google Scholar
Bollich, P. K., Jordan, D. L., Walker, D. M., and Burns, A. B. 1997. Rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance of clomazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:181.Google Scholar
Carter, P. C., Frans, R. E., Smith, M. C., and McClelland, M. 1995. Efficacy and selectivity of PPI and PRE applications of Command in cotton. San Diego, CA: National Cotton Council. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. p. 604.Google Scholar
Crumby, T. I. and Taylor, J. L. 1995. Stewardship of Command 4 EC herbicide in cotton—past and future. San Diego, CA: National Cotton Council. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. pp. 613–614.Google Scholar
Curless, J. K. and Talbert, R. E. 1996. Mapping confirmed propanil-resistant barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] with global positioning systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:173.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Knake, E. L., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Corn (Zea mays) injury following use of clomazone, chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:539–544.Google Scholar
Earnest, L. D., Webster, E. P., Beaty, J. D., and Baldwin, F. L. 1997. Potential for Command use in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:180.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E. R., Fay, P. K., and Inskeep, W. P. 1989. Clomazone dissipation in two Montana soils. Weed Technol. 3:146–150.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Beaty, J. D., Horton, D. K., Talbert, R. E., Guy, C. B., Mattice, J. D., Lavy, T. L., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1995. Effects of rotational crop herbicides on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 43:648–654.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with postemergence applications of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 12:537–541.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Reynolds, D. B., and Crawford, S. H. 1997. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to soil residues of selected herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:379–383.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Miller, D. M. 1998. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci. 46:374–380.Google Scholar
Kendig, J. A., Swims, P. A., and Bivins, S. R. 1994. Effect of incorporation on clomazone efficacy and phytotoxicity in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:56.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
Marth, J. L., Corbin, F. T., and York, A. C. 1990. Interactions between clomazone and four insecticides in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:338.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Hatfield, L. D. 1996. Grass control in rice with clomazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:46.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1990. Clomazone for weed control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 4:648–651.Google Scholar
Stringer, S. J., Crumby, T. I., and Taylor, J. L. 1996. Micro-encapsulated clomazone formulations for cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:4.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Carey, V. F. III, Kitt, M. J., Helms, R. S., and Guy, C. B. 1995. Identification and management of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.]. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:172.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Baldwin, F. L. 1998. Clomazone use in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:39.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 1995. Cotton development and yield with clomazone, norflurazon, and fluometuron systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:38.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678–685.Google Scholar