Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:21:19.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) Control in Field Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Prostko ,
Joseph Ingerson-Mahar  and
Brad A. Majek
Eric P. Prostko
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Mt. Holly, NJ 08060
Joseph Ingerson-Mahar
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Vineland, NJ 08360
Brad A. Majek
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in New Jersey during 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the efficacy of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, dicamba, and clopyralid on horsenettle control in field corn. Horsenettle biomass was reduced 74%, 68%, 64%, 61%, 48%, and 40% by primisulfuron + dicamba, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron + dicamba, dicamba, clopyralid, and nicosulfuron, respectively. No treatment was statistically more effective than dicamba. Corn yields were not influenced by the herbicide treatments. Horsenettle populations were not reduced by any treatment.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidnicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]N-N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideprimisulfuron, 2-[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidhorsenettle, Solanum carolinense L.# SOLCAcorn, Zea mays L.ClopyraliddicambanicosulfuronprimisulfuronSOLCA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 441 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Santelmann, P. W. 1978. Influence of subsurface layered herbicides on horsenettle and various crops. Agron. J. 70:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brooks-Gould, A. and Hamilton, G. C. 1993. Pesticides for New Jersey. NJ Agric. Exp. Stn. Pub. E045H. p. W36.Google Scholar
3. Frank, J. R. 1990. Influence of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) on snapbean. Weed Sci. 38:220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fritz, T. J., Curran, W. S., and Hartwig, N. L. 1992. Effectiveness of some newer herbicides on selected broadleaf perennial weeds in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:30–31.Google Scholar
5. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1981. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) fleshy roots in pastures. Weed Sci. 29:586–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1988. Translocation and fate of dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr in horsenettle, Solanum carolinense . Weed Sci. 36:447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hackett, N. M., Murray, P. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987. Interference of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ilnicki, R. D. and Fertig, S. N. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in the Northeast—horsenettle. Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. Rhode Island Bull. No. 368. 27 p.Google Scholar
9. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous Plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 289.Google Scholar
10. Marcelli, M. and Glenn, S. 1993. Pokeweed and horsenettle control in no-tillage corn with CGA-136872 and DPX-V9360. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:204.Google Scholar
11. Wehtje, G, Wilcut, J. W., Vint Hicks, T., and Sims, G. R. 1987. Reproductive biology and control of Solanum dimidiatum and Solanum carolinense . Weed Sci. 35:356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar