Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T19:17:50.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POST Control of Carolina Redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen L. Meyers ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks ,
James R. Ballington  and
David L. Jordan
Stephen L. Meyers*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
James R. Ballington
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2012 in Raleigh, NC to determine Carolina redroot control by ten POST herbicides. Paraquat and glufosinate provided the greatest control 14 (73 and 64%, respectively) and 25 d (82 and 68%, respectively) after treatment (DAT), but control declined between 25 and 63 DAT (72 and 59%, respectively). Glyphosate provided minimal control 14 DAT (18%), and control increased from 14 to 25 DAT (46%) and 25 to 63 DAT (69%). Control of Carolina redroot roots and rhizomes (roots/rhizomes) was greatest in plants treated with paraquat (91%), glyphosate (88%), glufosinate (73%), hexazinone (62%), diuron (60%). Nontreated Carolina redroot shoot and root/rhizome dry weight were 8.3 and 7.6 g, respectively. Paraquat, glufosinate, glyphosate, and diuron reduced both shoot and root/rhizome dry weight (3.1 and 0.7 g, 5.1 and 2.7 g, 5.4 and 1.0, 5.7 and 1.6 g, respectively). Hexazinone reduced root/rhizome dry weight (2.7 g). Fomesafen reduced shoot dry weight (6.1 g), but did not reduce root/rhizome dry weight. Paraquat, glufosinate, glyphosate, hexazinone, diuron, and clopyralid treatments resulted in reduced incidence of Carolina redroot flowering and anthesis.

En 2012, se realizaron estudios de invernadero en Raleigh, NC para determinar el control de Lachnanthes caroliniana con diez herbicidas POST. Paraquat y glufosinate brindaron el mayor control 14 d (73 y 64%, respectivamente) y 25 d (82 y 68%, respectivamente) después del tratamiento (DAT), pero el control disminuyó entre 25 y 63 DAT (72 y 59%, respectivamente). Glyphosate brindó un control mínimo 14 DAT (18%), y el control incrementó de 14 a 25 DAT (46%) y 25 a 63 DAT (69%). El control de las raíces y rizomas (raíces/rizomas) de L. caroliniana fue mayor en plantas tratadas con paraquat (91%), glyphosate (88%), glufosinate (73%), hexazinone (62%), diuron (60%). El peso seco del tejido aéreo y raíces/rizomas de L. caroliniana sin tratar fue 8.3 y 7.6 g, respectivamente. Paraquat, glufosinate, glyphosate, y diuron redujeron el peso seco del tejido aéreo y raíces/rizomas (3.1 y 0.7 g, 5.1 y 2.7, 5.4 y 1.0, 5.7 y 1.6 g, respectivamente). Hexazinone redujo el peso seco de raíces/rizomas (2.7 g). Fomesafen redujo el peso seco del tejido aéreo (6.1 g), pero no redujo el peso seco de raíces/rizomas. Los tratamientos con paraquat, glufosinate, glyphosate, hexazinone, diuron, y clopyralid resultaron en una incidencia reducida de floración y antesis de L. caroliniana.

Keywords

Clopyraliddiuronflumioxazinfomesafenglufosinateglyphosatehalosulfuron-methylhexazinoneparaquatsethoxydimCarolina redroot, Lachnanthes caroliniana (Lam.) DandyEfficacyherbicideweed control
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 534 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Extension Specialist, Extension Service, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS 38863.

References

Literature Cited

Ferrell, J., Sellers, B., and Walter, J. 2009. Control of Redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana) in Pastures. Gainesville, FL University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. SS AGR 290. 2 p.Google Scholar
Meggitt, W. F. and Aldrich, R. J. 1959. Amitrol for control of redroot in cranberries. Weeds. 7:271–276.Google Scholar
[NCDA&CS] North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services. 2012. Pages 63, 82 in 2011 North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. Raleigh, NC NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. M. 2009. Biology and Control of Maryland Meadowbeauty (Rhexia mariana L.) in Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) in North Carolina. . Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University. 86 p.Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2012. PLANTS Profile- Lachnanthes caroliniana Lam. (Dandy), Carolina redroot. http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=LACA5. Accessed: July 26, 2012.Google Scholar
Weakley, A. S. 2011. Flora of the Southern and Mid-Atlantic States. http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora_2011-May-nav.pdf. Accessed: August 3, 2012.Google Scholar
Welker, W. V. Jr. 1979. Control of redroot (Lachnanthes tinctoria). Page 142 in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Northeastern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Welker, W. V. Jr. and Brogdon, J. L. 1968. Response of highbush blueberries to long-term use of diuron and simazine. Weed Sci. 16:303–305.Google Scholar
Wood, J. E., Stephenson, G. R., Hall, J. C., and Horton, R. F. 1992. Selective phytotoxicity of hexazinone to Pinus resinosa and Pinus banksiana . Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 44:108–118.Google Scholar