Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:15:30.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization of Application Efficacy for POST Herbicides with Adjuvants on Three-Cornered Jack (Emex australis Steinheil) in Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Muhammad Mansoor Javaid  and
Asif Tanveer
Muhammad Mansoor Javaid*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan
Asif Tanveer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate POST herbicides with adjuvants for the control of three-cornered jack in winter wheat. The herbicides evaluated were fluroxypyr 9.7% w/w + MCPA 38.8% w/w (formulated mixture [450 g ai ha−1]), carfentrazone-ethyl (20 g ai ha−1), bromoxynil 26.8% w/w + MCPA 40.0% w/w (formulated mixture [450 g ai ha−1]), thifensulfuron-methyl (75 g ai ha−1), and tribenuron-methyl (75 g ai ha−1), applied alone or tank mixed with the adjuvants alkyl ether sulfate sodium salt (625 mL ha−1) or fatty alcohol ethoxylate (375 mL ha−1). The addition of adjuvants to carfentrazone-ethyl resulted in > 94% control of three-cornered jack. Both adjuvants enhanced the efficacy of all herbicides for control of three-cornered jack, except thifensulfuron-methyl. However, a maximum increase in phytotoxicity on three-cornered jack was achieved with the addition of either adjuvant to tribenuron-methyl compared with herbicides used alone. Bromoxynil + MCPA and carfentrazone-ethyl gave maximum wheat yield and yield components.

Se realizaron estudios de campo para evaluar herbicidas POST con adyuvantes para el control de Emex australis en trigo de invierno. Los herbicidas evaluados fueron fluroxypyr 9.7% w/w + MCPA 38.8% w/w (mezcla en formulación [450 g ai ha−1]), carfentrazone-ethyl (20 g ai ha−1), bromoxynil 26.8% w/w + MCPA 40.0% w/w (mezcla en formulación [450 g ai ha−1]), thifensulfuron-methyl (75 g ai ha−1), y tribenuron-methyl (75 g ai ha−1), aplicados solos o en mezcla en tanque con los adyuvantes sal de alkyl ether sulfate sodium (625 mL ha−1) o alcohol graso ethoxylate (375 mL ha−1). La adición de adyuvantes a carfentrazone-ethyl resultó en >94% de control de E. australis. Ambos adyuvantes mejoraron la eficacia de todos los herbicidas para el control de E. australis, excepto thifensulfuron-methyl. Sin embargo, un incremento máximo de fitotoxicidad en E. australis se alcanzó con la adición de cualquiera de los adyuvantes a tribenuron-methyl al compararse con los herbicidas usados solos. Bromoxynil + MCPA y carfentrazone-ethyl brindaron el mayor rendimiento y componentes de rendimiento del trigo.

Keywords

Fluroxypyr + MCPAcarfentrazone-ethylbromoxynil + MCPAthifensulfuron-methyltribenuron-methylthree-cornered jack, Emex australis Steinheilwheat, Triticum aestivum L.AdjuvantsPOST herbicidesweed control
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 437 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abbas, R. N., Tanveer, A., Ali, A., and Zaheer, Z. A. 2010. Simulating the effect of Emex australis densities and sowing dates on agronomic traits of wheat. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 47:104–110.Google Scholar
Adamczewski, K. and Matysiak, R. 2005. The effects and benefits of adjuvants used with sulfonyl urea herbicides. Prog. Plant Prot. 45:17–24.Google Scholar
Bernards, M. L., Penner, D., and Michael, J. 2009. Imazapyr absorption and translocation in northern red oak and red maple as affected by herbicide formulation and the adjuvant methylated seed oil. J. ASTM Int. 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. 1999. Influence of adjuvants and bromoxynil on absorption of clethodim. Weed Technol. 13:536–541.Google Scholar
Degenhardt, R. E., Spaner, D., Harker, K. N., McGregor, W. R., and Hall, L. M. 2005. Effect of herbicides on field violet (Viola arvensis) in direct-seeded spring wheat. Weed Technol. 19:359–371.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. 1993. Spiny emex (Emex australis). Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia Department of Industries and Fisheries Agnote 585. 2 p.Google Scholar
Gitsopoulos, T. K., Melidis, V., and Evgenidis, G. 2010. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to post-emergence applications of topramezone. Crop Prot. 29:1091–1093.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Cahill, W. R. 2003. Enhancing the biological activity of nicosulfuron with pH adjusters. Weed Technol. 17:338–345.Google Scholar
Gugaa, M., Zarzecka, K., and Zadrozniak, B. 2010. An effect of adjuvants on potato yielding and limiting weed infestation in potato stands. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli Aklimatyzacji Roslin. 255:47–57.Google Scholar
Hagon, M. W. and Simmons, D. M. 1978. Seed dormancy of Emex australis and E. spinosa . Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:565–575.Google Scholar
Hazen, J. L. 2000. Adjuvants—terminology, classification, and chemistry 1. Weed Technol. 14:773–784.Google Scholar
Howatt, K. A. 2005. Carfentrazone-ethyl injury to spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is minimized by some ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 19:777–783.Google Scholar
James, T. K. and Rahman, A. 1992. Effect of simulated rainfall and adjuvants on the phytotoxicity of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pages 1–2 in Proceedings of the 1st International Weed Control Congress. Volume 2. Melbourne, Australia: Weed Science Society of Victoria Inc., Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, S., Matysiak, K., and Krawczyk, R. 2009. Studies of the chemical weed control in Sorghum vulgare Perz. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Agricultura. 8:27–35.Google Scholar
Kammler, K. J., Walters, S. A., and Young, B. G. 2010. Effects of adjuvants, halosulfuron, and grass herbicides on Cucurbita spp. Injury and grass control. Weed Technol. 24:147–152.Google Scholar
Kieloch, R. and Domaradzki, K. 2008. The abiotic factors affecting the effectiveness of herbicides. Fragmenta Agronomica. 25:61–70.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Datta, A., Scott, J., and Charvat, L. D. 2010. Tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to pre-emergence and post-emergence application of saflufenacil. Crop Prot. 29:148–152.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Dodds, D. M., and Reynolds, D. B. 2007. Effect of adjuvants and urea ammonium nitrate on bispyribac efficacy, absorption, and translocation in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). I. Efficacy, rainfastness, and soil moisture. Weed Sci. 55:399–405.Google Scholar
Kruger, G. R., Davis, V. M., Weller, S. C., and Johnson, W. G. 2008. Response and survival of rosette-stage horseweed (Conyza canadensis) after exposure to 2, 4–D. Weed Sci. 56:748–752.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J., Kniss, A., and Miller, S. D. 2007. Carfentrazone improves broadleaf weed control in proso and foxtail millets. Weed Technol. 21:84–87.Google Scholar
Mohassel, M. H. R., Aliverdi, A., Hamami, H., and Zand, E. 2010. Optimizing the performance of diclofop-methyl, cycloxydim, and clodinafop-propargyl on littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) control with adjuvants. Weed Biol. Manag. 10:57–63.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2002. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 9. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scott, J. K., Yeoh, P. B., and Woodburn, T. L. 2000. Apion miniatum (Coleoptera: Apionidae) and the control of Emex australis (Polygonaceae): conflicts of interest and non-target effects. Pages 473–485 in Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Montana: Montana State University, Bozeman USA.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H., and Dicky, D. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. Multiple Comparisons. 3rd ed. New York McGraw Hill Book. Pp. 178–198.Google Scholar
Steinheil, A. D. 1838. Flore de Barbarie in Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Botanique. 9:193.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. M. and Nissen, S. J. 2000. Absorption and fate of carfentrazone-ethyl in Zea mays, Glycine max, and Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Sci. 48:15–19.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3:60–66.Google Scholar
Zabkiewicz, J. 2000. Adjuvants and herbicidal efficacy—present status and future prospects. Weed Res. 40:139–149.Google Scholar
Zand, E., Baghestani, M. A., Soufizadeh, S., PourAzar, R., Veysi, M., Bagherani, N., Barjasteh, A., Khayami, M. M., and Nezamabadi, N. 2007. Broadleaved weed control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with post-emergence herbicides in Iran. Crop Prot. 26:746–752.Google Scholar