Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:15:26.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olive (Olea europea) Jift Suppresses Broomrape (Orobanche spp.) Infections in Faba Bean (Vicia faba), Pea (Pisum sativum), and Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hani Z. Ghosheh*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Khalid M. Hameed
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biological Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Munir A. Turk
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Abbas F. Al-Jamali
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Olive jift is a solid by-product of olive (Olea europea) oil processing. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate olive jift effect on broomrape (Orobanche spp.) infections on three crops. Soil—jift mixtures were used as potting medium in ratios of 1:0, 1:1, and 3:1 soil to jift. Broomrape seeds were evenly incorporated in the potting media at 0, 150, 300, 450, 600, 750, and 900 seeds/kg. Pots planted with faba bean or pea were inoculated with seeds of O. crenata Forsk., whereas pots planted with tomato were inoculated with seeds of O. lavandulacea Reichenb. Jift in soil reduced broomrape germination and infection on all three hosts regardless of inoculation densities. Pea was not infected with broomrape in jift-containing media at any inoculation density, whereas only sporadic broomrape infections were observed in faba bean and tomato grown in jift-mixed soils. Fresh and dry weights of all crops were not adversely affected by mixing jift with soil. These results suggest a possible use of jift as an inexpensive organic material for broomrape control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abu-Irmaileh, B. E. 1994. An overview of parasitic weed problems in some Near East countries. In The Report of Orobanche and Cuscuta Parasitic Weed Management in the Near East Workshop. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 823.Google Scholar
Castejón-Munõz, M., Romero-Munõz, F., and García-Torres, L. 1993. Effect of planting date on broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl.) infections in sunflower (Helianthus animus L.). Weed Res. 33:171176.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 4:123152.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L. 1994. An overview of non-biological control measures of the parasitic weeds Orobanche spp. In The Report of Orobanche and Cuscuta Parasitic Weed Management in the Near East Workshop. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 3344.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L. and Lopez-Granados, F. 1991. Control of broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk.) in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) with imidazolinones and other herbicides. Weed Res. 31:227236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Torres, L., Romero-Munõz, F., and Mesa-García, J. 1987. Agronomic problem and chemical control of broomrape in Spain. Proc. 4th International Symposium on Parasitic Flowering Plants, Marburg, Germany. pp. 241248.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The Water Culture Method of Growing Plants without Soil. Berkeley: California Agriculture Experiment Station Circular 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
Jurado-Expósito, M. and Castejón-Munõz, M. 1996. Broomrape control with imazethapyr applied to pea seed. Weed Technol. 10:774780.Google Scholar
Linke, K.-H., Sauerborn, J., and Saxena, M. C. 1989. Orobanche Field Guide. University Hohenheim, Germany, and International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria. 42 p.Google Scholar
Lolas, P. C. 1986. Control of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 34:427430.Google Scholar
Pera, J. and Calvet, C. 1989. Suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation in a composted pine bark and a composted olive pumice. Plant Dis. 73:699700.Google Scholar
Pieterse, A. H. 1981. Germination of Orobanche crenata Forsk. seeds in vitro. Weed Res. 21:279287.Google Scholar
Rodríguz-Kábana, R., Estaún, V., Pinochet, J., and Marf, O.á. 1995. Mixtures of olive pomace with different nitrogen sources for the control of Meloidogyne spp. on tomato. J. Nematol. 27(4S): 575584.Google Scholar
Saghir, A. R. 1986. Dormancy and germination of Orobanche seeds in relation to control methods. In ter Borg, S. J., ed. Proc. Workshop on Biology and Control of Orobanche. Wageningen, The Netherlands: LH/VPO. pp. 2534.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J., Linke, K.-H., Saxena, M. C., and Kodd, W. 1989a. Solaraization, a physical control method for weeds and parasitic plants (Orobanche spp.) in Mediterranean Agriculture. Weed Res. 29:391397.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J., Saxena, M. C., and Meyer, A. 1989b. Broomrape control in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with glyphosate and imazaquin. Weed Res. 29:97102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, D. 1994. Potential for biological control of Cuscuta spp. and Orobanche spp. In Labrada, R., ed. Proc. Workshop of Orobanche and Cuscuta Parasitic Weed Management in the Near East. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 4557.Google Scholar
Thahabi, S. 1994. Orobanche and Cuscuta status and control in Jordan. In Labrada, R., ed. Proc. Workshop of Orobanche and Cuscuta Parasitic Weed Management in the Near East. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. p. 72.Google Scholar