Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:07:56.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nature, Occurrence, and Cost of Herbicide-Resistant Wild Oat (Avena fatua) in Small-Grain Production Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
A. Gordon Thomas ,
Anne Légère ,
David J. Kelner ,
Rene C. van Acker  and
Scott Meers
Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X2
A. Gordon Thomas
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X2
Anne Légère
Affiliation:
Soils and Crops Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2560 Hochelaga Boulevard, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
David J. Kelner
Affiliation:
Westco, Rosser, MB, Canada R0H 1E0
Rene C. van Acker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2
Scott Meers
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 280B Ridge Road, Strathmore, AB, Canada T1P 1B6
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Surveys were conducted across the northern Great Plains of Canada in 1996 and 1997 to determine the nature and occurrence of herbicide-resistant (HR) biotypes of wild oat (Avena fatua). The surveys indicated that resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors (Group 1) occurred most frequently relative to other herbicide groups. Group 1-HR wild oat occurred in over one-half of fields surveyed in each of the three prairie provinces. Of particular concern was the relatively high incidence of multiple-group resistance in wild oat in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. In Saskatchewan, 18% of Group 1-HR populations were also resistant to acetolactate synthase inhibitors (imidazolinones), even though these herbicides were not frequently used. In Manitoba, 27% of fields surveyed had wild oat resistant to herbicides from more than one group. Four populations were resistant to all herbicides registered for use in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Depending on the nature of resistance in wild oat, alternative herbicides available for their control may substantially increase costs to the grower. The cost to growers of managing HR wild oat in Saskatchewan and Manitoba using alternative herbicides is estimated at over $4 million annually. For some HR biotypes, alternative herbicides either are not available or all have the same site of action, which restricts crop or herbicide rotation options and threatens the future sustainability of small-grain annual cropping systems where these infestations occur.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Surveysacetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitorsacetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitorsmultiple-group resistanceAVEFAACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2)ALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)AOPP, aryloxyphenoxy propionateCHD, cyclohexanedioneHR, herbicide-resistantPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceS, susceptible
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 612 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution 1315 of the Saskatoon Research Centre, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X2.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1997a. 1996 Census: Agricultural Profile of Manitoba. Catalogue 95-178-XPR. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. 215 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997b. 1996 Census: Agricultural Profile of Saskatchewan. Catalogue 95-179-XPR. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. 219 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997c. 1996 Census: Agricultural Profile of Alberta. Catalogue 95-180-XPR. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. 113 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. Guide to Crop Protection 1999: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. Bi-Provincial Publication. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food; Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Agriculture. 301 p.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Effect of ethalfluralin and other herbicides on trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Technol. 7:6–14.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Légère, A. 1999. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) across Saskatchewan ecoregions. Weed Technol. 13:626–631.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Kenkel, N. C., and Morrison, I. N. 1997a. Characterization of cross-resistance patterns in acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 45:750–755.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997a. Mapping risk areas for resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:173–179.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997b. A survey of ACCase inhibitor resistant wild oat in a high risk township in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:703–708.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Morrison, I. N., and Kelner, D. 1997b. Field and grower survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:709–715.Google Scholar
Downey, R. K. 1999. Gene flow and rape—the Canadian experience. In Gene flow and agriculture: Relevance for transgenic crops. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council. pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
Ecological Stratification Working Group. 1995. A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Ottawa, ON, and Hull, QC: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, and Environment Canada, Stale of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch. 125 p.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1994. Identification and documentation of herbicide resistance. Phytoprotection 75(Suppl.): 85–90.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1996. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 44:25–30.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M., Murray, B. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Morrison, I. N. 1993. Resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 41:232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M. S., Moss, S. R., and Thomas, T. H. 1990. Herbicide resistance in Alopecurus myosuroides. In Green, M. B., LeBaron, H. M., and Mobert, W. K., eds. Managing Resistance to Agrochemicals: From Fundamental Research to Practical Strategies. ACS Symp. Ser. 421, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, K. J. and Beckie, H. J. 1998. Contribution of nitrogen fertilizer placement to weed management in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 12:507–514.Google Scholar
Morrison, I. N., Bourgeois, L., Friesen, L., and Kelner, D. 1995. Betting against the odds: the problem of herbicide resistance. In Roberts, T. L., ed. Proc. 1995 Western Canada Agronomy Workshop, Red Deer, AB: Potash and Phosphate Institute of Canada. pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Friesen, L. F., Beaulieu, K. J., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. A seed bioassay to identify acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) populations. Weed Technol. 10:85–89.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Morrison, I. N., and Brûlé-Babel, A. L. 1995. Inheritance of acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor-resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43:233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Sharma, M. P., Harker, K. N., Maurice, D., Baig, M. N., and Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Wild oat (Avena fatua) populations resistant to triallate are also resistant to difenzoquat. Weed Sci. 42:195–199.Google Scholar
Retzinger, E. J. and Mallory-Smith, C. 1997. Classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 11:384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:34–43.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Frick, B. L., and Hall, L. M. 1998a. Alberta Weed Survey: Cereal and Oilseed Crops 1997. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 98-2. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 242 p., excl. maps.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Frick, B. L., Van Acker, R. C., Knezevic, S. Z., and Joosse, D. 1998b. Manitoba Weed Survey: Cereal and Oilseed Crops 1997. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 98-1. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 192 p., excl. maps.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Wise, R. F., Frick, B. L., and Juras, L. T. 1996. Saskatchewan Weed Survey: Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops 1995. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 96-1. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 419 p.Google Scholar