Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:56:52.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of foliar spray retention on creeping bentgrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Pingyuan Zhang
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Bruce E. Branham*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Bruce E. Branham, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, 1201 S. Dorner Drive, Urbana, IL 61801. (E-mail: [email protected])

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of spray volume, nozzle type, adjuvants, the presence of dew, and their interactions on foliar retention of creeping bentgrass. Tartrazine, a common food dye, was used as a tracer in this study. Increasing spray volume from 95 L ha−1 to 1,500 L ha−1 decreased foliar retention efficiency from 98% to approximately 85%. Compared with flat-fan nozzles, air-induction nozzles delivered similar retention efficiency at all spray volumes evaluated. However, flat-fan nozzles provided higher uniformity and more thorough coverage. Adding nonionic surfactants, organosilicone adjuvants, or methylated seed oils at typical concentrations yielded retention efficiency of approximately 90% to 93% regardless of spray volumes. In contrast, with water alone, increasing spray volume reduced retention efficiency from 95.9% to 87.3%. Simulated dew applied at 1,950 L ha−1 increased retention efficiency by approximately 3% when spray application volume was 190 L ha−1, while no difference was observed at 750 L ha−1. The presence of dew reduced the impact of adjuvants on retention efficiency. Large quantities of dew, 3,800 L ha−1, did reduce retention efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong-Cho, C, Wolf, T, Chongo, G, Gan, Y, Hogg, T, Lafond, G, Johnson, E, Banniza, S (2008) The effect of carrier volume on ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) control in chickpea. Crop Prot 27:10201030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler Ellis, MC, Webb, DA, Western, NM (2004) The effect of different spray liquids on the foliar retention of agricultural sprays by wheat plants in a canopy. Pest Manag Sci 60:786794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byer, KN, Peng, G, Wolf, TM, Caldwell, BC (2006) Spray retention and its effect on weed control by mycoherbicides. Biol Control 37:307313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, JV, Walklate, PJ, Murray, RA, Richardson, GM (2001) Spray deposits and losses in different sized apple trees from an axial fan orchard sprayer: 1. Effects of spray liquid flow rate. Crop Prot 20:1330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvalle, TC, Landschoot, PJ, Kaminski, JE (2011) Effects of dew removal and mowing frequency on fungicide performance for dollar spot control. Plant Dis 95:14271432 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorr, GJ, Forster, WA, Mayo, LC, McCue, SW, Kempthorne, DM, Hanan, J, Turner, IW, Belward, JA, Young, J, Zabkiewicz, JA (2016) Spray retention on whole plants: modelling, simulations, and experiments. Crop Prot 88:118130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, PCC, Chiu, T, Sammons, RD, Ryerse, JS (2003) Droplet size affects glyphosate retention, absorption, and translocation in corn. Weed Sci 51:443448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furmidge, CGL (1962) Physico-chemical studies on agricultural sprays. IV. The retention of spray liquids on leaf surfaces. J Sci Food Agric 13:127140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossen, BD, Peng, G, Wolf, TM (2008) Improving spray retention to enhance the efficacy of foliar-applied disease- and pest-management products in field and row crops. Can J Plant Pathol 30:505516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, FR, Chapple, AC, Downer, RA, Kirchner, LM, Thacker, JRM (1993) Pesticide application as affected by spray modifiers. Pestic Sci 38:123133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, SE, Kells, JJ, Penner, D (1992) Influence of adjuvants on the efficacy, absorption, and spray retention of Primisulfuron. Weed Technol 6:592598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, PJ (1993). Structure and chemistry of plant cuticles. Pestic Sci 37:203232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, PJ, Butler-Ellis, MC, Webb, DA, Western, NM, Tuck, CR, Hayes, AL, Miller, PCH (2000) Effects of some agricultural tank-mix adjuvants on the deposition efficiency of aqueous sprays on foliage. Crop Prot 19:2737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennelly, MM, Wolf, RE (2009) Effect of nozzle type and water volume on dollar spot control in greens-height creeping bentgrass. Appl Turfgrass Sci 6, 10.1094/ATS-2009-0921-01-RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoche, M (1994) Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Prot 13: 163178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, PE, Hart, SE (2009) Chelated iron and adjuvants influence bispyribac-sodium efficacy for annual bluegrass (Poa annua) control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol 23:519523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, SJ, Dernoeden, PH, Bigelow, CA (2006) Dollar spot control in creeping bentgrass as influenced by fungicide spray volume and application timing. Appl Turfgrass Sci 3, 10.1094/ATS-2006-0531-01-RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, PCH, Butler-Ellis, MC (2000) Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers. Crop Prot 19:609615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, RA, Cross, JV, Ridout, MS (2000) The measurement of multiple spray deposits by sequential application of metal chelate tracers. Ann Appl Biol 137:245252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nairn, JJ, Forster, WA (2019) Due diligence required to quantify and visualise agrichemical spray deposits using dye tracers. Crop Prot 115:9298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, G, Wolf, TM, Byer, KN, Caldwell, B (2005) Spray retention on green foxtail (Setaria viridis) and its effect on weed control efficacy by Pyricularia setariae . Weed Technol 19:8693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pergher, G (2000) Recovery rate of tracer dyes used for deposit assessment. Trans ASAE 44:787794 Google Scholar
Prado, EP, Raetano, CG, Pogetto, MHF, Do, AD, Chechetto, RG, Filho, PJF, Magalhaes, AC, Miasaki, CT (2016) Effects of agricultural spray adjuvants in surface tension reduction and spray retention on Eucalyptus leaves. Afr J Agric Res 11:39593965 Google Scholar
Ramsdale, BK, Messersmith, CG (2001) Nozzle, spray volume, and adjuvant effects on carfentrazone and imazamox efficacy. Weed Technol 15:485491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiter, HD, Uffing, AJM, Meinen, E, Prins, A (1990) Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci 38:567572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saab, OJGA, Griesang, F, Alves, KA, Higashibara, LR, Genta, W (2017) Pesticides deposition in vineyards on different conditions of leaf wetness. Engenharia Agricola 37:286291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Hermosilla, J, Medina, R, Rodriguez, F, Callejon, A (2008) Use of food dyes as tracers to measure multiple spray deposits by ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrophotometry. Trans ASABE. 51:11771186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zyl, SA, Brink, J, Calitz, FJ, Fourie, PH (2010) Effects of adjuvants on deposition efficiency of fenhexamid sprays applied to Chardonnay grapevine foliage. Crop Prot 29:843852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, DW, Powell, AJ, Dougherty, CT, Vincelli, P (1998) Separation and quantitation of the sources of dew on creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci 38:16131617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, BG, Hart, SE (1998) Optimizing foliar activity of Isoxaflutole on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) with various adjuvants. Weed Sci 46:397402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawierucha, JE, Penner, D (2000) Absorption, translocation, metabolism, and spray retention of quinclorac in Digitaria sanguinalis and Eleusine indica . Weed Sci 48:296301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawierucha, JE, Penner, D (2001) Adjuvant efficacy with quinclorac in canola (Brassica napus) and turfgrass. Weed Technol 15:220223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar