Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:33:46.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control in Imidazolinone-Resistant Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kevin C. Clemmer ,
Alan C. York  and
Cavell Brownie
Kevin C. Clemmer
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Cavell Brownie
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Imazamox ammonium salt at 53 g ae/ha applied postemergence in the fall to imidazolinone-resistant wheat controlled Italian ryegrass 98 to 100% 10 wk after treatment (WAT). Control 22 WAT was 88 to 98% at two locations and 55% at a third location. Imazamox was more effective applied in fall to three- to four-leaf Italian ryegrass than when applied in spring to one- to three-tiller Italian ryegrass. Split applications, with 27 g/ha applied in fall and spring, were no more effective than 53 g/ha applied in fall. Pendimethalin preemergence in combination with fall-applied imazamox increased control 22 WAT 10 to 33 percentage points at two of three locations. Imazethapyr ammonium salt plus imazapyr isopropylamine salt applied at 47 plus 16 g ae/ha and imazamox at 44 or 53 g/ha were similarly effective, whereas imazethapyr at 70 g/ha was ineffective. Control by imazapic ammonium salt at 70 g ae/ha was equal to or greater than control by imazamox at 44 or 53 g/ha. Imazamox, imazethapyr plus imazapyr, and imazapic controlled diclofop-resistant and -susceptible Italian ryegrass. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron mixed with imazamox increased Italian ryegrass control in field and greenhouse experiments, whereas dicamba reduced control compared with imazamox applied alone. Control by imazamox plus 2,4-D was similar to or greater than control by imazamox alone.

Keywords

Dicambadiclofopimazamoximazapicimazapyrimazethapyrimidazolinoneisopropylaminependimethalinthifensulfurontribenuron2,4-DItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. Marshall # LOLMUwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Herbicide interactionsherbicide-resistant weedsweed managementDAT, days after treatmentI80, rate required for 80% visible control or 80% fresh weight reductionIR, imidazolinone-resistantPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 481 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: North Carolina Department of Transportation, Roadside Environmental Unit, 1557 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1557

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003a. Beyond™ Herbicide Label:. Web page: http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: March 28, 2004.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2003b. Harmony Extra® Herbicide:. Web page: http://www.greenbook.net. Accessed: March 28, 2004.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P., Olsen, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J 68:463–466.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Walenta, D. L. 1997. Jointed Goatgrass and Downy Brome Control in Imidazolinone-resistant Winter Wheat. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. 89 p.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Peeper, T. F., Epplin, F. M., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 2001. Effects of herbicides on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), forage production, and economic returns from dual-purpose winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 15:264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, L. T., Oliver, L. R., Baldwin, F. L., and Scott, R. C. 2001. Diclofop-resistant ryegrass control with imazamox in Clearfield wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 54:10.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Shoot zone activity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belles, W. S. and Thill, D. C. 1998. Weed Control in Imidazolinone-resistant Winter Wheat. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. Newark, CA: Western Society of Weed Science. 146 p.Google Scholar
Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinner, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J 69:911–913.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. 1990. Italian ryegrass control in small grains with flurtamone. Weed Technol. 4:871–875.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. 2002. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) management in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with AE F130060 plus AE F115008. Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 135 p.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2002. Weed management in wheat. in 2001-2002 Wheat Production Guide. Publication CSS0-01-17. Tifton, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 50:227–246.Google Scholar
Draper, N. and Smith, H. 1981. Introduction to nonlinear estimation. in Applied Regression Analysis. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 458–529.Google Scholar
Gamroth, D. M., Brewster, B. D., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. Control of Annual Grasses in Imidazolinone-resistant Winter Wheat with Imazamox. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. Newark, CA: Western Society of Weed Science. Pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds:. Web page: http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: March 28, 2004.Google Scholar
Justice, G. G., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Epplin, F. M. 1994. Net returns from Italian ryegrass control in winter wheat. Weed Technol. 8:317–323.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Frans, R. E., and Collins, F. C. 1983. Diclofop—a selective herbicide for Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 31:436–438.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987a. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383–387.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987b. Interference of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat. Weed Sci. 35:819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malefyt, T. and Quakenbush, L. 1991. Influence of environmental factors on the biological activity of the imidazolinone herbicides. in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 104–126.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Ewing, J., and Witt, W. 1998. Managing Weedy Grasses with Fall and Spring Applications of Hoelon. University of Kentucky Wheat Science Research Report 1997-98: Web page: http://www.ca.uky.edu/ukrec/RR97-98.html. Accessed: March 28, 2004.Google Scholar
Neider, T. L. and Thill, D. C. 1997. Weed Control in Imidazolinone-resistant Winter Wheat with AC 299,263. Western Society of Weed Science Research Progress Report. Newark, CA: Western Society of Weed Science. 101 p.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K. E., Smith, W. A., Starret, M. A., Schaefer, T. J., and Singh, B. K. 1992. Tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in wheat. Plant Physiol 100:882–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prendeville, G. N., Eshel, Y., Schreiber, M. M., and Warren, G. F. 1967. Site of uptake of soil-applied herbicides. Weed Res 7:316–322.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350–352.Google Scholar
Tucker, K. P., Miller, T. D., Bauman, P. A., and Senseman, S. A. 2002. Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) management in central Texas wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:24–25.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1990. Behaviour of dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. Weed Technol. 4:394–406.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:247–274.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Weisz, R., Crooks, H. L., and Tarleton, B. 2000. Small grain weed control. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000-01. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 57–63.Google Scholar
Youmans, C. D. and Taylor, F. 2000. An introduction to Clearfield wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:168.Google Scholar