Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:24:58.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions of Diphenylether Herbicides with Chlorimuron and Imazaquin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. Todd Wesley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Field experiment were conducted to determine interactions of chlorimuron or imazaquin with fomesafen, lactofen, or acifluorfen on three-leaf and eight-leaf common cocklebur, hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and prickly sida. Antagonism was the most common interaction with common cocklebur, and was most severe with chlorimuron combined with fomesafen or acifluorfen, whereas lactofen did not antagonize common cocklebur control. Reductions in control were greater when low rates of chlorimuron were used. On three-leaf prickly sida, control synergistically increased when imazaquin was combined with fomesafen or acifluorfen, but the majority of these combinations were additive on eight-leaf prickly sida. Three-leaf pitted morningglory control synergistically increased when 36 g ai ha–1 imazaquin was combined with 210 g ai ha–1 fomesafen or 110 or 220 g ai ha–1 lactofen. With eight-leaf pitted morningglory, synergism occurred when 2 g ai ha–1 chlorimuron was combined with the high rate of any diphenylether herbicide tested, and when 36 g ha–1 imazaquin was combined with 110 g ha–1 lactofen or 210 g ai ha–1 acifluorfen; however, at higher rates of chlorimuron or imazaquin, several antagonistic interactions occurred. Hemp sesbania was controlled over 90% by all combinations, and no interactions occurred.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, P. C., and Hibberd, K. A. 1985. Evidence for the interaction of an imidazolinone herbicide with leucine, valine, and isoleucine metabolism. Weed Sci. 33:479483.Google Scholar
2. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, J. M., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Chapter 3: Sulfonylureas, in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Vol. 3. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Chen, Y. Z., and Penner, D. 1985. Combination effects of acifluorfen with crop oil concentrates and postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:9195.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.Google Scholar
5. Duke, S. O. 1987. A non-metabolic model of acifluorfen activity. Z. Naturforch. 42:813818.Google Scholar
6. Duke, S. O., Lydon, J., and Paul, R. N. 1989. Oxidation activity is similar to that of p-nitro-diphenyl ether herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:152160.Google Scholar
7. Godley, J. L., and Kitchen, L. M. 1986. Interactions of acifluorfen with fluazifop for annual grass control. Weed Sci. 34:936941.Google Scholar
8. Kishore, G. M., and Shah, D. P. 1988. Amino acid biosynthesis inhibitors as herbicides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57:627633.Google Scholar
9. Lydon, J., and Duke, S. O. 1988. Porphyrin synthesis is required for photobleaching activity of the p-nitrosubstituted diphenyl ether herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 31:7483.Google Scholar
10. Matringe, M., Camadro, J. M., Labbe, P., and Scalla, R. 1989. Photoporphyrinogen oxidase as a molecular site for diphenyl ether herbicides. Biochem. J. 260:232235.Google Scholar
11. Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf weed herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223227.Google Scholar
12. Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329334.Google Scholar
13. Riley, D. G., and Shaw, D. R. 1988. Influence of imazapyr on the control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with chlorimuron, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 36:663666.Google Scholar
14. Riley, D. G., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:9598.Google Scholar
15. Sorensen, V. M., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449456.Google Scholar
16. Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:455458.Google Scholar
17. Westberg, D. E., and Coble, H. D. 1989. Antagonism of chlorimuron by acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:361.Google Scholar
18. Westberg, D. E., and Coble, H. D. 1990. Field confirmation of the antagonism between chlorimuron and acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:40.Google Scholar
19. Wixson, M. B., and Shaw, D. R. 1990. Potential uses of AC 263,222 in soybeans and rotational crop tolerance. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:26.Google Scholar