Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:18:54.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Wheat Seeding Rate and Cultivars on Competitive Ability of Bifra (Bifora radians)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Husrev Mennan  and
Bernard H. Zandstra
Husrev Mennan
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, Plant and Soil Science Building, East Lansing, MI 48824
Bernard H. Zandstra*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, Plant and Soil Science Building, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bifra is an annual noxious broadleaf weed of winter-sown crops in the Central Anatolia and Middle Black Sea regions of Turkey. This species has become more prevalent in wheat fields in the past three decades because of poor chemical control. Field experiments were conducted in Havza and Kavak, Samsun, Turkey, to evaluate the effect of cultivar and seeding rate on the competitive interaction between bifra and wheat at four bifra densities. Wheat grain yield increased with seeding rate, either in the presence or in the absence of bifra in both locations. Decreasing the seeding rate from 250 to 200 kg/ha or 150 kg/ha decreased wheat yield in the presence of bifra in all cultivars. The percentage yield decreases were different according to cultivars, although yields decreased in all cultivars. On the basis of the analysis of yield variables, data suggest that the relative competitiveness was ‘Bezostaja’ > ‘Momtchill’ > ‘Kate A-1’ = ‘Panda’. Bifra biomass and seed numbers were reduced not only by an increase in the wheat seeding rate but also by cultivars. Bifra seed production in Bezostaja, Kate A-1, Momtchill, and Panda were diminished 60, 53, 54, and 46%, respectively, at the seeding rate of 250 kg/ha compared with bifra alone at a density of 350 plants/ m2.

Keywords

Bifra, Bifora radians BiebWinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Bezostaja’, ‘Kate A-1’, ‘Momtchill’, ‘Panda’Competitionweed managementwheat cultivars
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 128 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., Panwar, S., and Singh, S. 1991. Competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars with wild oat (Avena ludoviciana). Weed Sci. 39:154–158.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, A. R. W. 1981. Effect of seeding rate dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and production of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:212–217.Google Scholar
Caussanel, J. P., Bouhache, M., Mennan, H., and Trouvelot, A. 1998. Biological and economical aspects in integrated management of some Umbelliferae and Leguminosae weeds in dryland cereals. in 6th EWRS Mediterranean Symposium, May 13–15, 1998, Montpellier, France. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Pp. 281–289.Google Scholar
Challaiah, R. E., Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. 1995. Weed suppression ability of spring barley varieties. Weed Res 35:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epplin, F. M., Fofana, N. F., Peeper, T. F., and Solie, J. B. 1996. Optimal wheat seeding rate for conventional and narrow rows for cheat-free and cheat-infested fields. J. Prod. Agric 9:265–270.Google Scholar
Frederick, J. R. and Marshall, H. G. 1985. Grain yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat as affected by management practices. Agron. J 77:495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Appl 3:84–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kappler, B. F., Lyon, D. J., Stahlman, P. W., Miller, S. D., and Eskridge, K. M. 2002. Wheat plant density influences jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) competitiveness. Weed Technol. 16:102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Soloman, S. G. Jr. 1991. Seeding date, seeding rate and row spacing effect wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cheat (Bromus secalinus). Weed Technol. 5:707–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasagna, C. A., Altobelli, O., and Lusetti, C. 1984. Five years of experience on pre and post emergence weed control in wheat. Atti del convegno su “La difesa dei cereali nell” ambito dei pragetti finalizzati del. Roma, Italy: CNR. 353–359.Google Scholar
Mennan, H. 1998. Samsun İli Buğday Ekim Alanlarında Önemli Zarara Neden Olan Kokarot (Bifora radians Bieb.) ve Yapışkanotu (Galium aparine L.)'nun Ekonomik Zarar Eşiklerinin ve Bazı Biyolojik Özelliklerinin Araştırılması. Çukurova Üni. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, s 137.Google Scholar
Mennan, H. and Uygur, F. N. 1994. Samsun ili buğday ekim alanlarında gö rülen yabancı ot türlerinin saptanması. O.M.Ü. Ziraat Fak. Derg. 9(2): 25–35.Google Scholar
Milijic, S. 1987. The influence of crop rotation and fertilization on the floristic structure and characteristics of the weed synusium in wheat. Drugi kongres u korovima. Belgrade, Yugoslavia: Zbornik Refercta. Pp. 275–283.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., and Hall, L. M. 2000. Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate. Weed Technol. 14:624–629.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. and Seefeldt, S. S. 1999. Characterizing traits that enhance the competitiveness of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) against jointed goat-grass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 47:74–80.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. R., Peeper, T. F., and Solie, J. B. 2001. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate and cultivar affect interference from rye (Secale cereale). Weed Technol. 15:19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2001. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 3884 p.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Ogg, A. G., and Yuesheng, H. 1999. Near-isogenic lines for Triticum aestivum height and crop competitiveness. Weed Sci. 47:316–320.Google Scholar
Skorda, E. A., Efthimiadis, P., and Adamidis, T. H. 1998. The persistence and rise of Bifora radians in cereal crops. in 6th EWRS Mediterranean Symposium, May 13–15, 1998, Montpellier, France. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Pp. 234–235.Google Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. 1984. Plant demography in an agricultural context. in Dirzo, R. and Sarukhan, J., eds. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. Pp. 389–407.Google Scholar
Taştan, B. 1988. Orta Anadolu buğday ekim alanlarında sorun olan kokarot (Bifora radians Bieb.)'un yayılışı, biyolojisi ve mücadele metotları. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi s 138.Google Scholar
Tompkins, D. K., Fowler, D. B., and Wright, A. T. 1991. Water use by no-till winter wheat influence of seed rate and row spacing. Agron. J 83:766–776.Google Scholar