Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:24:56.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Planting Depth and Application Timing on S-metolachlor Injury in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Benjamin P. Sperry
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Jason A. Ferrell*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
West Florida Research and Education Center and Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Jay, FL 32565
Diane L. Rowland
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Michael J. Mulvaney
Affiliation:
West Florida Research and Education Center and Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Jay, FL 32565
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted in 2015 at multiple locations in Florida to evaluate the effects of planting depth and application timing on S-metolachlor injury in sesame. In both studies, sesame responded negatively to increases in S-metolachlor rate. Altering sesame planting depth did not provide increased safety to PRE S-metolachlor applications. Sesame establishment declined with increased planting depth, likely because of the physical inability of the small seed to emerge from the 3.8-cm depth. Delaying applications of S-metolachlor by 3 or 6 d after planting (DAP) consistently improved sesame establishment. Applications 3 and 6 DAP resulted in 89 to 92% seedling emergence at 2 wk after planting (WAP), relative to 55 to 63% emergence when S-metolachlor was applied the day of planting (0 DAP) or 3 days before (−3 DAP), respectively. Applications 3 DAP resulted in 21 and 2% plant stunting when evaluated 3 and 6 WAP, respectively, whereas all other timings caused 25 to 51% stunting. Yield was reduced 22 and 33% by the −3 DAP and 0 DAP application timings, respectively, whereas no reduction in yield was observed by the delayed application timings. Therefore, delaying applications of S-metolachlor by 3 to 6 days will likely result in improved sesame seedling establishment and total seed yield.

En 2015, se realizaron dos experimentos en varias localidades en Florida para evaluar los efectos de la profundidad de siembra y el momento de aplicación de S-metolachlor sobre el daño causado al ajonjolí. En ambos estudios, el ajonjolí respondió negativamente a incrementos en la dosis de S-metolachlor. El alterar la profundidad de siembra del ajonjolí no aumentó la seguridad con respecto a las aplicaciones PRE de S-metolachlor. El establecimiento del ajonjolí disminuyó al aumentar la profundidad, probablemente debido a la inhabilidad física de la semilla pequeña de emerger desde 3.8 cm de profundidad. El retrasar las aplicaciones de S-metolachlor 3 ó 6 d después de la siembra (DAP) consistentemente mejoró el establecimiento del ajonjolí. Aplicaciones 3 ó 6 DAP resultaron en 89 a 92% de emergencia de plántulas a 2 semanas después de la siembra (WAP), en comparación con 63 y 55% de emergencia cuando S-metolachlor fue aplicado el día de la siembra (0 DAP) o 3 días antes (−3 DAP), respectivamente. Las aplicaciones 3 DAP resultaron en 21 y 2% de reducción en altura de plantas cuando se evaluó 3 y 6 WAP, respectivamente. Mientras que todos los otros momentos de aplicación causaron 25 a 51% de reducción en altura de planta. El rendimiento se redujo 22 y 33% con aplicaciones realizadas −3 DAP y 0 DAP, respectivamente. Sin embargo, no se observaron reducciones en el rendimiento con los momentos de aplicación realizados después de la siembra. De esta manera, el retrasar las aplicaciones de S-metolachlor de 3 a 6 días resultará en un mejor establecimiento de plántulas y rendimiento total de semilla de ajonjolí.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Lawrence Steckel, University of Tennessee.

References

Literature Cited

Clewis, SB, Wilcut, JW, Porterfield, D (2006) Weed management with S-metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Weed Technol 20: 232241 Google Scholar
Coble, HD, Schrader, JW (1973) Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci 21: 308309 Google Scholar
Conley, SP, Abendroth, L, Elmore, R, Christmas, EP, Zarnstorff, M (2008) Soybean seed yield and composition response to stand reduction at vegetative and reproductive stages. Agron J 100: 16661669 Google Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Colburn, AE, Baumann, PA (1996) Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by method of metolachlor application. Weed Technol 10: 278281 Google Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Dotray, PA (2007) Weed control and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) response to preplant incorporated herbicides and method of incorporation. Crop Prot 26: 18261830 Google Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Dotray, PA, Langham, DR (2009) Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) response to preemergence herbicides. Crop Prot 28: 928933 Google Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Dotray, PA, Langham, DR (2012) Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) growth and yield as influenced by preemergence herbicides. Int J Agron 2012: 10.1155/2012/809587Google Scholar
Hamilton, KC, Arle, HF, Cahill, WP, Witt, JM (1966) Preplanting applications of diuron in cotton. Weeds 14: 145148 Google Scholar
Haskins, FA, Gorz, HJ (1975) Influence of seed size, planting depth, and companion crop on emergence and vigor of seedlings in sweetclover. Agron J 67: 652654 Google Scholar
Ijlal, Z, Akhtar, N, Ali, A, Ashraf, M, Atif, FA, Aziz, A, Maqbool, MM, Safdar, ME, Tanveer, A (2011) Effects of weed crop competition period on weeds and yield and yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Pak J Weed Sci Res 17: 5163 Google Scholar
Islam, MK, Khanam, MS, Maniruzzaman, M, Alam, I, Huh, MR (2014) Effect of seed rate and manual weeding on weed infestation and subsequent crop performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Aust J Crop Sci 8: 10641071 Google Scholar
Keeling, JW, Abernathy, JR (1989) Preemergence weed control in a conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cropping system on sandy soils. Weed Technol 3: 182185 Google Scholar
Kendig, JA, Nichols, RL, Ohmes, GA (2007) Tolerance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings to preemergence and postemergence herbicides with four modes of action. Plant Health Prog DOI: 10.1094/PHP-2007-1108-01-RSGoogle Scholar
Langham, DR, Riney, J, Smith, G, Wiemers, T (2008) Sesame Harvest Guide. Austin, TX: Sesaco Corporation. http://www.sesaco.com/Websites/sesaco/images/Harvest_pamphlet_080903_final_b.pdf. Accessed: April 14, 2016Google Scholar
Langham, DR, Wiemers, T, Janick, J, Whipkey, A (2002). Progress in mechanizing sesame in the US through breeding. Pages 157173 in Proceedings of the Fifth National Symposium. Trends in New Crops and New Uses. Atlanta, GA: ASHS Press Google Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2012) Response of sweetpotato cultivars to S-metolachlor rate and application time. Weed Technol 26: 474479 Google Scholar
Nangju, D, Plucknett, DL, Obien, SR (1976) Some factors affecting herbicide selectivity in upland rice. Weed Sci 24: 6367 Google Scholar
TeKrony, DM, Bustamam, T, Egli, DB, Pfeiffer, TW (1987) Effects of soybean seed size, vigor, and maturity on crop performance in row and hill plots. Crop Sci 27: 10401045 Google Scholar
Wicks, GA, Knezevic, SZ, Bernards, M, Wilson, RG, Klein, RN, Martin, AR (2007) Effect of planting depth and isoxaflutole rate on corn injury in Nebraska. Weed Technol 21: 642646 Google Scholar