Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:41:15.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Emulsifiable Oils and Emulsifier on the Performance of Phenmedipham, Metoxuron, Sethoxydim, and Quizalofop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hans De Ruiter ,
Andre J. M. Uffing  and
Esther Meinen
Hans De Ruiter
Affiliation:
DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), P.O. Box 14, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Andre J. M. Uffing
Affiliation:
DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), P.O. Box 14, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Esther Meinen
Affiliation:
DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), P.O. Box 14, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and growth chamber experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of emulsifiable mineral oil, emulsifiable rapeseed oil, and the emulsifier (polyoxyethylene C13/C15 oxo alcohol) on the efficacy of phenmedipham and metoxuron against common lambsquarters, and of sethoxydim and the ethyl ester of quizalofop against winter wheat. In field studies, mineral oil and rapeseed oil were equally effective in increasing the efficacy of phenmedipham (0.24 and 0.48 kg ai/ha), metoxuron (0.6 and 1.2 kg ai/ha), and sethoxydim (0.05 and 0.1 kg ai/ha), but mineral oil was superior to rapeseed oil with quizalofop. In growth chamber studies, mineral oil and rapeseed oil were equally effective in increasing the efficacy of metoxuron, sethoxydim, and quizalofop-ethyl, but rapeseed oil was more effective than mineral oil with phenmedipham. Both in the field and in the growth chamber, the emulsifier was at least as effective as the oil adjuvants, when combined with all herbicides except sethoxydim. The herbicide doses giving 50% response (ED50) were determined for the growth chamber experiments. The adjuvants reduced the ED50 2.7-fold with phenmedipham, 51-fold with metoxuron, 2.7-fold with sethoxydim, and 6.8-fold with quizalofop when averaged over the three adjuvants. It was concluded that rapeseed oil (all tested herbicides except quizalofop) or the emulsifier (all tested herbicides except sethoxydim) can serve as a substitute for mineral oil.

Keywords

Metoxuron, N'-(3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)-N,N-dimethyl ureaphenmedipham, 3-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]phenyl (3-methylphenyl)carbamatequizalofop, (±)-2-[4-[(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Arminda.'Adjuvantdose response curvegraminicideChenopodium albumTriticum aestivumCHEALDAT, days after treatmentED50, equivalent dose for 50% responseEO, ethylene oxideHLB, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 290 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckett, T. H., Stoller, E. W., and Bode, L. E. 1992. Quizalofop and sethoxydim activity as affected by adjuvants and ammonium fertilizers. Weed Sci. 40:12–19.Google Scholar
Bravais, F., Cabanne, F., and Gauvrit, C. 1993. Influence of triolein and methyl-, ethyl- and propyloleate on the deposit shape and the foliar penetration of phenmedipham and quizalofop-ethyl. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent 58(3A): 803–807.Google Scholar
Briggs, G. G., and Bromilow, R. H., 1994. Influence of physicochemical properties on uptake and loss of pesticides and adjuvants from the leaf surface. In Holloway, P. J., Rees, R., and Stock, D., eds. Interactions Between Adjuvants, Agrochemicals, and Target Organisms, Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop 12. Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Burger, W. G. and Hauwert, P.C.M. 1993. Risk analysis of adjuvants in pesticide products and policy for adjuvants TNO Environmental and Energy Research Report. No. R 93/181. Delft, The Netherlands: TNO Institute. 66 p.Google Scholar
Coupland, D. and Robinson, S. 1992. The evaluation of ten emulsifiers for use with a mineral oil adjuvant. In Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 449–461 Google Scholar
de Ruiter, H., Uffing, A.J.M., Meinen, E., and Prins, A. 1990. Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Sci. 38:567–572.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, H., Uffing, A.J.M., and Straatman, K. R. 1991. The influence of three adjuvants on the phytotoxicity of phenmedipham, difenoxuron and sethoxydim. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 56/3A:863–870.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, H., Hoekstra, J. R., and Uffing, A.J.M. 1987. The influence of different adjuvants on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate and fluazifop-P-butyl. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 52(3B): 1217–1223.Google Scholar
Gauvrit, C. and Cabanne, F. 1993. Oils for weed control: uses and mode of action. Pestic. Sci. 37:147–153.Google Scholar
Grayson, B. T., Webb, J. D., and Pack, S. E. 1993. Investigation of an emulsifiable oil adjuvant and its components on the activity of a new grass herbicide by factorial experimentation. Pestic. Sci. 37:127–131.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. J. 1993. Structure and general properties of mineral and vegetable oils used as spray adjuvants. Pestic. Sci. 37:141–146.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. 1992. Effects of various adjuvants on sethoxydim activity. Weed Technol. 6:865–870.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides for soybeans. Weed Sci. 31:557–561.Google Scholar
Kudsk, P., Thonke, K. E., and Streibig, J. C. 1987. Method for assessing the influence of additives on the effect of foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 27:425–429.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Szelezniak, E. F., Anyszka, Z. M., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Foliar absorption and phytotoxicity of quizalofop with lipid compounds. Weed Sci. 40:558–562.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Nalewaja, J. D., and Szelezniak, E. F. 1989. Esterified seed oils with herbicides. In Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals, Volume II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 139–148.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Matsyak, R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Petroleum oil and emulsifier affect the phytotoxicity of imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:81–84.Google Scholar
McMullan, P. M. 1993. Emulsifier surfactant-oil combinations with tralkoxydim. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:1275–1281.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Effect of additives upon phenmedipham for weed control in sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 21:67–70.Google Scholar
Moerkerk, M. R. and Combellack, J. H. 1992. The relationship between spray retention and herbicidal efficacy of diclofop-methyl. In Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 311–317.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. 1986. Seed oils with herbicides. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 51(2A): 301–310.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. 1995. Behaviour, applicability and efficacy of non-surfactant adjuvants. In Gaskin, R. E., ed. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Rotorua, NZ: New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd. pp. 186–192.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Skrzypczak, G. A. 1986. Absorption and translocation of sethoxydim with additives. Weed Sci. 34:657–663.Google Scholar
Santier, S. and Chamel, A. 1996. Penetration of triolein and methyl oleate through isolated plant cuticles and their effect on penetration of [14C]quizalofop-ethyl and [14C]fenoxaprop-ethyl. Weed Res. 36:167–174.Google Scholar
Schott, J. J., Dufour, J. L., and Gauvrit, C. 1991. Effects of adjuvants on herbicidal action. III. Effects of petroleum and rapeseed oils on diclofop-methyl action on ryegrass. Agronomie 11:27–34.Google Scholar
Steiner, A. A. 1984. The Universal Nutrient Solution. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Soilless Culture. pp. 633–650.Google Scholar
Stevens, P.J.G. and Bukovac, M. J. 1987. Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants. Part 2: effects on foliar uptake and translocation. Pestic. Sci. 20:37–52.Google Scholar
Stock, D. and Davies, L. E. 1994. Foliar penetration of agrochemicals: limitations imposed by formulation type and some interactions with adjuvants. In Holloway, P. J., Rees, R., and Stock, D., eds. Interactions Between Adjuvants, Agrochemicals, and Target Organisms. Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop 12. Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
Stock, D., Holloway, P. J., Grayson, B. T., and Whitehouse, P. 1993. Development of a predictive uptake model to rationalise selection of polyoxyethylene surfactant adjuvants for foliage applied agrochemicals. Pestic. Sci. 37:233–245.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Warner, H. L., and Fitzgerald, P. G. 1995. Effect of Mor-act on postemergence activity and particle size of oxyfluorfen emulsion. In Gaskin, R. E., ed. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. Rotorua, NZ: New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd. pp. 237–242.Google Scholar
West, T. M., Clay, D. V., and Bullard, M. 1988. Effect of additives on the toxicity of three herbicides to Bromus sterilis. In Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium. Factors Affecting Herbicidal Activity and Selectivity. Wageningen, The Netherlands: EWRS. pp. 151–156.Google Scholar
Zandvoort, R. 1988. Influence of oils and ethoxylated alkylamines on the phytotoxicity of phenmedipham to wild chamomile and black nightshade. In Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society Symposium. Factors Affecting Herbicidal Activity and Selectivity. Wageningen, The Netherlands: EWRS. pp. 157–162.Google Scholar