Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:21:11.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of carrier water pH, foliar fertilizer, and ammonium sulfate on 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Pratap Devkota Open the ORCID record for Pratap Devkota [Opens in a new window]  and
William G. Johnson
Pratap Devkota*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, West Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, Jay, FL, USA
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Professor of Weed Science, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Pratap Devkota, West Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS, 4253 Experiment Drive, Jay, FL 32565. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carrier water pH is an important factor for enhancing herbicide efficacy. Coapplying agrochemical products with the herbicide might save time and resources; however, the negative effect of foliar fertilizers on herbicide efficacy should be thoroughly evaluated. In greenhouse studies, the effect of carrier water pH (4, 6.5, and 9), foliar fertilizer (zinc [Zn], manganese [Mn], or without fertilizer), and ammonium sulfate (AMS) at 0% or 2.5% vol/vol was evaluated on 2,4-D and premixed 2,4-D plus glyphosate efficacy for giant ragweed, horseweed, and Palmer amaranth control. In addition, a field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of carrier water pH (4, 6.5, and 9); and Zn or Mn foliar fertilizer on premixed 2,4-D plus glyphosate efficacy for horseweed and Palmer amaranth control. In the greenhouse study, 2,4-D and premixed 2,4-D plus glyphosate provided 5% greater weed control at acidic compared with alkaline carrier water pH. Coapplied Mn foliar fertilizer reduced 2,4-D and premixed 2,4-D plus glyphosate efficacy at least 5% for weed control. Addition of AMS enhanced 2,4-D and premixed 2,4-D plus glyphosate efficacy at least 6% for giant ragweed, horseweed, and Palmer amaranth control. In the field study, few significant differences occurred between coapplied Zn or Mn foliar fertilizer for any treatment variables. Therefore, carrier water pH, coapplied foliar fertilizer, and water-conditioning adjuvants have potential to influence herbicide performance. However, weed species could play a role in the differential response of these factors on herbicide efficacy.

Keywords

Daniel Stephenson, Louisana State University Agricultural Center2,4-Dglyphosategiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRhorseweed, Erigeron canadensis (L.) ERICAPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPACarrier water qualitycarrier water pHcoapplied foliar fertilizerwater-conditioning adjuvant
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 562 - 568
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, WA, Poston, DH, Wilson, HP, Hines, TE (2002) Glyphosate interactions with manganese. Weed Technol 16:792–799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Thelen, KD, Penner, D (2005a) Glyphosate efficacy is antagonized by manganese. Weed Technol 19:27–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Thelen, KD, Penner, D, Muthukumaran, RB, McCracken, JL (2005b) Glyphosate interaction with manganese in tank mixtures and its effect on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci 53:787–794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, DC (1989) Adjuvant and pH effects on sethoxydim and clethodim activity on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol 3:615–620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD, Burnside, OC (1983) Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci 31:163–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, GS, Jordan, DL, Burton, JD, Danehower, D, York, AC, Eure, PM, Clewis, B (2012) Influence of water quality and coapplied agrochemicals on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol 26:167–176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Whitaker, JR, MacRae, AW, York, AC (2008) Distribution of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Georgia and North Carolina during 2005 and 2006. J Cotton Sci 12:306–310 Google Scholar
Davis, VM (2012) Integrating 2, 4-D and dicamba resistant soybean into Wisconsin cropping systems. Proc of the 2012 Wisconsin Crop Management Conference 51:36–37 Google Scholar
Deer, HM, Beard, R (2001) Effect of water pH on the chemical stability of pesticides. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1074&context=extension_histall. Accessed: April 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Devkota, P, Johnson, WG (2016a) Glufosinate efficacy as influenced by carrier water pH, hardness, foliar fertilizer, and ammonium sulfate. Weed Technol 30:848–859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devkota, P, Spaunhorst, DJ, Johnson, WG (2016b) Influence of carrier water pH, hardness, foliar fertilizer, and ammonium sulfate on mesotrione efficacy. Weed Technol 30:617–628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, LR, Hanway, JJ (1976) Foliar fertilization of soybeans during the seed-filling period. Agron J 68:653–657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM, Cahill, WR (2003) Enhancing the biological activity of nicosulfuron with pH adjusters. Weed Technol 17:338–345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JM, Hale, T (2005) Increasing the biological activity of weak acid herbicides by increasing and decreasing the pH of the spray mixture. J ASTM Int 2:62–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronwald, JW, Jourdan, SW, Wyse, DL, Somers, DA, Magnusson, MU (1993) Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and maize (Zea mays) cell suspension cultures. Weed Sci 41:325–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, B (2001) Role of AMS with glyphosate products. Iowa State University Extension Agronomy. http://extension.agron.iastate.edu/weeds/mgmt/2001/ams.htm. Accessed: April 19, 2019.Google Scholar
Heap, I (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Country.aspx?CountryID=45. Accessed: August 20, 2018Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WG, Owen, MD, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Shaw, DR, Wilson, RG, Weller, SC (2009) U.S. farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 23:308–312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, LM, Wills, GD, Shaw, DR (1991) Influence of ammonium sulfate, imazapyr, temperature, and relative humidity on the absorption and translocation of imazethapyr. Weed Sci 39:412–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschhoff, JR, Hart, SE, Baldwin, JL (2000) Effect of ammonium sulfate on the efficacy, absorption, and translocation of glufosinate. Weed Sci 48:2–6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R (1991) Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci 39:622–628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R (1993) Spray carrier salts affect herbicide toxicity to kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol 7:154–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, JD, Matysiak, R, Szeleniak, E (1994) Sethoxydim response to spray carrier chemical properties and environment. Weed Technol 8:591–597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurse, RE, Hamill, AS, Kells, JJ, Sikkema, PH (2008) Annual weed control may be improved when AMS is added to below-label glyphosate doses in glyphosate-tolerant maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Prot 27:452–458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterhuis, DM, Weir, BL (2010) Foliar fertilization of cotton. Pages 272–288 in Stewart, JM, Oosterhuis, DM, Stewart, JM, Heitholt, J, and Mauney, JR, eds. Physiology of Cotton. Cham, Switzerland: Springer NatureCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, WA, Wu, J, Hatzios, KK (1999) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci 47:636–643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsdale, BK, Messersmith, CG, Nalewaja, JD (2003) Spray volume, formulation, ammonium sulfate, and nozzle effects on glyphosate efficacy. Weed Technol 17:589–598 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskamp, JM, Chahal, GS, Johnson, WG (2013a) The effect of cations and ammonium sulfate on the efficacy of dicamba and 2, 4-D. Weed Technol 27:72–77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roskamp, J, Turco, R, Bischoff, M, Johnson, WG (2013b) The influence of carrier water pH and hardness on saflufenacil efficacy and solubility. Weed Technol 27:527–533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, CD, Chandler, JM, Merkle, MG (1991) Ammonium sulfate enhancement of glyphosate and SC-0224 control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol 5:18–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmah, AK, Sabadie, J (2002) Hydrolysis of sulfonylurea herbicides in soils and aqueous solutions: a review. J Agric Food Chem 50:6253–6265 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, PJ, Tupy, DR (1984) Reversal of cation-induced reduction in glyphosate activity with EDTA. Weed Sci 32:802–806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shilling, DG, Haller, WT (1989) Interaction effects of diluent pH and calcium content of glyphosate activity on Panicum repens L. (torpedograss). Weed Res 29:441–448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AM, Born, WHV (1992) Ammonium sulfate increase efficacy of sethoxydim through increased absorption and translocation. Weed Sci 40:351–358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Nurse, RE, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2011) Effect of ammonium sulfate and water hardness on glyphosate and glufosinate activity in corn. Can J Plant Sci 91:1053–1059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, KD, Jackson, EP, Penner, D (1995) The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci 43:541–548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001). Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703–705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G, Penner, D, Kells, JJ (1989) The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci 37:400–404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, BG, Knepp, AW, Wax, LM, Hart, SE (2003) Glyphosate translocation in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in response to ammonium sulfate. Weed Sci 51:151–156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, RK, Nalewaja, JD, Peterson, DE, Young, BG (2010) Effect of hard water and ammonium sulfate on weak acid herbicide activity. J ASTM Int 7:1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar