Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:49:53.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicide Programs for Controlling Glyphosate-Resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dennis B. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Box 357, Lonoke, AR 72086
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Three field experiments were conducted in 2010 and 2012 in a soybean production field near West Memphis, AR, containing glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass. The goal of this research was to develop effective herbicide programs for glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Control of the resistant johnsongrass was greater with glufosinate at 590 and 740 g ai ha−1 than at 450 g ha−1. Sequential glufosinate applications were more effective than a single application, irrespective of rate. A PRE application of flumioxazin at 71 g ai ha−1 immediately after planting provided no more than 26% johnsongrass control 6 wk after soybean emergence (WAE). The addition of clethodim at 136 g ai ha−1 to sequential applications of glufosinate at 450 g ha−1 improved control over sequentially applied glufosinate alone. Herbicide programs containing imazethapyr or imazamox in combination with glufosinate followed by clethodim plus glufosinate controlled johnsongrass at least 94% at 10 WAE and provided three distinct mechanisms of action, a highly effective resistance management strategy. Results from this research indicate that a high level of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass control can be achieved through the use of several herbicide options in glufosinate-resistant soybean.

En 2010 y 2012, se realizaron tres experimentos en campos de producción de soya cerca de Memphis Oeste, AR, que tenían Sorghum halepense resistente a glyphosate. El objetivo de esta investigación fue desarrollar programas efectivos de herbicidas para el control de S. halepense resistente a glyphosate en soya resistente a glufosinate. El control de S. halepense resistente fue mayor con glufosinate a 590 y 740 g ai ha−1 que a 450 g ha−1. Aplicaciones secuenciales de glufosinate fueron más efectivas que aplicaciones sencillas, independientemente de la dosis. Una aplicación PRE de flumioxazin a 71 g ai ha−1 inmediatamente después de la siembra brindó no más de 26% control de S. halepense, 6 semanas después de la emergencia de la soya (WAE). La adición de clethodim a 136 g ai ha−1 a las aplicaciones secuenciales de glufosinate a 450 g ha−1 mejoraron el control en comparación con las aplicaciones secuenciales de glufosinate solo. Los programas de herbicidas que contenían imazethapyr o imazamox en combinación con glufosinate seguido de clethodim más glufosinate controlaron S. halepense en al menos 94% a 10 WAE y brindaron tres modos de acción distintos, lo que es una estrategia altamente efectiva para el manejo de resistencia. Los resultados de esta investigación indican que se puede alcanzar un alto nivel de control de S. halepense resistente a glyphosate mediante el uso de varias opciones de herbicidas en soya resistente a glufosinate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2013) Liberty 280 SL specimen label. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/IdUA5004.pdf Accessed August 4, 2013Google Scholar
Bendixen, LE (1988) Soybean (Glycine max) competition helps herbicides control johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol 2:4648 Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Walker, TW, Bollich, PK, Kroger, CH, Gerard, P (2005) Seeding rates for stale seedbed rice production in the midsouthern United States. Agron J 97:15601563 Google Scholar
Bridges, DC (1989) Adjuvant and pH effects on sethoxydim and clethodim activity on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol 3:615620 Google Scholar
Bromilow, RH, Chamberlain, K, Evans, AA (1993) Phloem translocation of strong acids__glyphosate, substituted phosphonic acids and sulfonic acids__in Ricinus communis . Pestic Sci 37:3337 Google Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642647 Google Scholar
Buchanan, GA (1974) Weed survey: southern states. South Weed Sci Soc Res Rep 27:215249 Google Scholar
Burke, IC, Askew, SD, Corbett, JL, Wilcut, JW (2005) Glufosinate antagonizes clethodim control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Weed Technol 19:664668 Google Scholar
Burke, IC, Wilcut, JW, Crammer, J (2006) Cross-resistance of a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Technol 20:571575 Google Scholar
Camacho, RF, Moshier, LJ, Morishita, DW, Devlin, DL (1991) Rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays) with primsulfuron and nicosulfuron. Weed Technol 5:789794 Google Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, K (2001) Photosynthetic inhibition and ammonium accumulation in Palmer amaranth after glufosinate application. Weed Sci 49:454459 Google Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18:443453 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1999) Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 13:411420 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Jennings, KM, Batts, RB (2000) Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:7788 Google Scholar
Devine, MD, Duke, SO, Fedtke, C (1993) Inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis. Pages 274275 in Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Google Scholar
Elmore, CD (1983) Weed survey—southern states. South Weed Sci Soc Res Rep 39:136158 Google Scholar
Foy, CL, Witt, HL (1990) Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol 4:615619 Google Scholar
Frisvold, GB, Hurley, TM, Mitchell, PD (2009) Adoption of best management practices to control weed resistance by corn, cotton, and soybean growers. Agbioforum 12:370381 Google Scholar
Gardner, AP, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Monks, DW (2006) Glufosinate antagonizes postemergence graminicides applied to annual grasses and johnsongrass. J Cotton Sci 10:319327 Google Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stoller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:1420 Google Scholar
Heap I (2013) The International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed June 7, 2013Google Scholar
Johnson, DB, Norsworthy, JK (2010) Survey of herbicide-resistant johnsongrass in Arkansas. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 63:81 [Poster]Google Scholar
Kelly, ST, Miller, DK, Stewart, AM (2005) Ignite weed control systems in Liberty Link cotton. Pages 29262927 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA. Memphis, TN National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Lyon, BR (1991) Engineering microbial herbicide detoxification genes in higher plants. Pages 79108 in Dennis, ES, Llewellyn, DJ, eds. Molecular Approaches to Crop Improvement. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG (1989) History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev Weed Sci 4:85121 Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG, Hartwig, EE (1968) Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci 20:5659 Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Mitchell, PD, Young, BG, Culpepper, AS (2005) Proactive versus reactive management of glyphosate-resistant or tolerant weeds. Weed Technol 19:924933 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risk of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (Special Issue):3162 Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, TT, Kenyon, WH, Kuratle, H (1990) Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci 38:4549 Google Scholar
Orson, JH (1999) The cost to the producer of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol 13:607611 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Scott, RC, Bagavathiannan, M (2011) Glyphosate resistance in a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype from Arkansas. Weed Sci 59:299304 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO IV, Eubank, TW, Scott, RC (2013) Assessment of weed management needs in midsouth United States soybean: a consultant's perspective. Weed Technol. 27:612622 Google Scholar
Smeda, RJ, Snipes, CE, Barrentine, WL (1997) Identification of graminicide-resistant johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci 45:132137 Google Scholar
Steckel, GJ, Wax, LM, Simmons, FW, Phillips, WH 2nd (1997) Glufosinate efficacy is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol 11:484488 Google Scholar
Stephenson, DO 4th, Bond, JA, Walker, ER, Bararpour, MT, Oliver, LR (2004) Evaluation of mesotrione in Mississippi delta corn production. Weed Technol 18:11111116 Google Scholar
Stephenson, DO 4th, Griffin, J, Burgos, NR (2011) Glyphosate resistant johnsongrass monitoring and management. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:228 [Symposium]Google Scholar
Toler, JE, GuiceJ, JB, Murdock, EC (1996) Interference between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 44:331338 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Coble, HD (1997) Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol 11:308317 Google Scholar
Welch, C, Ross, MA (1997) Effect of glyphosate, glufosinate, and 2,4-D on Canada thistle and hemp dogbane root systems. Proc North Cent Weed Sci Soc 52:3335 Google Scholar
Williams, CS, Hayes, RM (1984) Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 32:498501 Google Scholar
Wilson, HP, Hines, TE, Bellinder, RR, Grande, JA (1985) Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 33:531536 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Leon, CT (2005) Response of rice cultivars to V-10029. Weed Technol 19:307311 Google Scholar