Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:42:19.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jerry A. Baysinger  and
Barry D. Sims
Jerry A. Baysinger
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Mo., Columbia, MO 65211
Barry D. Sims
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Mo., Delta Center, Portageville, MO 63873
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two field experiments were established in 1988 and 1989 in southeast Missouri to evaluate several herbicides and herbicide combinations for giant ragweed control in soybean. In 1988, a timely rainfall was not received for soil-applied herbicides and giant ragweed control was less than 75%. However, in 1989 soil moisture was sufficient for uptake of soil-applied herbicides and early season giant ragweed control was generally greater than 80%. Chlorimuron, chlorimuron plus 2,4-DB, imazaquin plus 2,4-DB, acifluorfen followed by naptalam plus 2,4-DB, fomesafen, and imazethapyr applied to 2.5 to 5-cm giant ragweed controlled more than 85% in 1988. In 1989, all POST treatments except imazaquin controlled more than 81% of giant ragweed 2 wk after treatments. Imazethapyr controlled seedling giant ragweed at heights up to 12 to 25 cm. Giant ragweed regrowth and/or reinfestation and giant ragweed seed production occurred with all herbicide treatments.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidfomesafen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzamideimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imodazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidnaptalam, 2-[(1-naphthalenyl-amino)carbonyl]benzoic acidgiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. ♯ AMBTRsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 5474’Acifluorfenbentazonchlorimuronclomazonefomesafenimazaquinimazethapyrlactofenmetribuzinnaptalam2,4-DBAMBTR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 13 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abul-Fatih, H. A., and Bazzaz, F. A. 1979a. The biology of (Ambrosia trifida). I. Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytol. 83:813–816.Google Scholar
2. Abul-Fatih, H. A., Bazzaz, F. A., and Hunt, R. 1979. The biology of (Ambrosia trifida L.). III. Growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 83:829–838.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybean. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
4. Bassett, I. J., and Crompton, C. W. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. (Ambrosia trifida). Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:1003–1010.Google Scholar
5. Baysinger, J. A., and Sims, B. D. 1991. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:358–362.Google Scholar
6. Beitler, J. S., Finnerty, D. W., Flannigan, H. A., Foor, S. R., Gorrell, R. M., Renkoski, M. A., Eiker, W. M. 1983. DPX-F6025 field results in the North Central Region. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:21.Google Scholar
7. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
8. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.Google Scholar
9. Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. p. 29–46 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
10. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1981. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with jimsonweed (Datura stramonium). Weed Sci. 29:500–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Johnston, G. B., and Webb, F. J. 1985. Control of giant ragweed in corn and soybean. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:54.Google Scholar
12. Johnston, G. B., and Webb, F. J. 1986. Evaluation of several new herbicides for broadleaf weed control in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:63.Google Scholar
13. Lewis, A. J. 1973. Ragweed control techniques: effect on old field plant populations. Torrey Bot. Club. Bull. 100:333–338.Google Scholar
14. Porter, W. C. 1990. Clomazone for weed control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 4:648–651.Google Scholar
15. Steyermark, J. A. 1963. Flora of Missouri. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. 1725 p.Google Scholar
16. Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678–685.Google Scholar
17. Wilson, J. S., and Foy, C. L. 1990. Weed control in no-tillage and conventional corn (Zea mays) with ICIA-0051 and SC-0774. Weed Technol. 4:731–738.Google Scholar