Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:55:48.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fenoxaprop Interactions for Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) Control in Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wei Zhang ,
Eric P. Webster ,
David C. Blouin  and
Christopher T. Leon
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, 45 Agricultural Administration Building, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Christopher T. Leon
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted in 2000 and 2001 to evaluate interaction of fenoxaprop with other herbicides for barnyardgrass control in rice. Changes in herbicide interaction over time were also evaluated, and herbicide combinations were ranked on the basis of compatibility. Fenoxaprop at 0.075 kg/ha plus bentazon or propanil plus molinate resulted in an additive response for barnyardgrass control at 10, 20, and 30 d after treatment (DAT); however, when the rate of fenoxaprop increased to 0.089 kg/ha, an antagonistic effect was found. Carfentrazone and halosulfuron consistently antagonized the activity of fenoxaprop at both rates on barnyardgrass. Bensulfuron at 10 and 20 DAT and triclopyr at 20 DAT were antagonistic to fenoxaprop. An increase in interaction over time was detected when fenoxaprop at 0.089 kg/ha was applied in mixture with carfentrazone at 0.04 kg/ha or halosulfuron at 0.05 kg/ha. These results indicate that propanil plus molinate and bentazon are more compatible with fenoxaprop at 0.075 kg/ha for barnyardgrass control, whereas bensulfuron, carfentrazone, halosulfuron, and triclopyr can antagonize fenoxaprop activity on barnyardgrass.

Keywords

Bensulfuronbentazoncarfentrazonefenoxaprophalosulfuronmolinatepropaniltriclopyrbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Cocodrie’AntagonismsynergismDAT, days after treatmentNLMIXED, nonlinear mixed procedurePOST, postemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 293 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, F. L., Dillon, T. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1999. Fenoxaprop + safener (AEF 046360) for weed control in rice. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:14.Google Scholar
Blouin, D. C., Webster, E. P., and Zhang, W. 2004. Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using non-linear mixed models methodology. Weed Technol. 18:464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferriera, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, J. L., Cornelius, P. L., and Barrett, M. 1988. Analyzing herbicide interaction: a statistical treatment of Colby's method. Weed Technol. 2:304–309.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Interaction of fenoxaprop with bensulfuron and bentazon in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 9:724–727.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Nastasi, P., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1989. Fenoxaprop for grass control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 3:131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Saichuk, J. K., Seilhan, K. P., Bollich, P. K., and Funderburg, E. R. 1999. General agronomic guidelines. in Anonymous ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Pub. 2321. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center. Pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333–338.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass. Weed Sci. 32:595–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide (Version 8). Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 2419–2504.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol. 2:232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Street, J. E. 1987. Rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 35:401–406.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., Lanclos, D. Y., Masson, J. A., and Pellerin, K. P. 2000. Rice Weed Control Annual Report. Baton Rouge, LA: Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, LSU AgCenter. Pp. 33–50, 148–159.Google Scholar