Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:56:13.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Postemergence Herbicides, Safener, and Tolerant Hybrids for Corn Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Mark J. VanGessel ,
Quintin R. Johnson  and
Barbara A. Scott
Mark J. VanGessel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware Research and Education Center, 16483 County Seat Highway, Georgetown, DE 19947
Quintin R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware Research and Education Center, 16483 County Seat Highway, Georgetown, DE 19947
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crop safety is one of the many considerations when deciding which POST herbicide to use. This research examined relative corn injury as a result of POST herbicides and the effect of including the safener isoxadifen, the choice of a sensitive or tolerant hybrid, or both. The herbicides included commercial combinations of dicamba, diflufenzopyr, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, and thifensulfuron, all at twice the labeled rate. Isoxadifen reduced twisting from dicamba plus diflufenzopyr but not with dicamba plus rimsulfuron. Isoxadifen had negligible effect on chlorosis. In general, rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron caused the most corn stunting, whereas including isoxadifen or using a tolerant hybrid often reduced corn injury. In two of the four years, treatments with rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron resulted in yield reductions. Although using products with isoxadifen or selecting tolerant hybrids may influence injury, herbicide selection will have the greatest effect on corn injury.

La seguridad en el cultivo es una de las muchas consideraciones cuando se decide cuáles herbicidas POST y a qué dosis se usarán estos. Esta investigación examinó el daño relativo del maíz como resultado de herbicidas POST y el efecto de incluir isoxadifen como antídoto, el efecto de la selección de híbridos sensibles o tolerantes, y la combinación de estos dos factores. Los herbicidas incluyeron combinaciones comerciales de dicamba, diflufenzopyr, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, y thifensulfuron, todos al doble de las dosis de etiqueta. Isoxadifen redujo el enrollamiento causado por dicamba más diflufenzopyr, pero no con dicamba más rimsulfuron. Isoxadifen tuvo un efecto mínimo sobre la clorosis. En general, rimsulfuron más thifensulfuron causaron el mayor retraso en el crecimiento del maíz, mientras que el incluir isoxadifen o usar un híbrido tolerante frecuentemente redujo el daño al maíz. En dos de los cuatro años, los tratamientos con rimsulfuron más thifensulfuron resultaron en reducciones en el rendimiento. Aunque el usar productos con isoxadifen o seleccionar híbridos tolerantes podría influenciar el nivel daño, la selección de los herbicidas tendrá el mayor efecto en el daño que sufrirá el maíz.

Keywords

Dicambadiflufenzopyrnicosulfuronrimsulfuronthifensulfuronisoxadifencorn, Zea mays L.Area under the curvecumulative stunting
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 869 - 877
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Daniel Stephenson, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2010) Dekalb Seed, corn product DKC63-42 brand (VT3). Dekalb Technical Bulletin. DeKalb, IL: Dekalb. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2011a) Hubner Seed, corn product H5707VT3 brand. Hubner Seed Technical Bulletin. West Lebanon, IN: Hubner. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2011b) Hubner Seed, corn product H5505VT3P brand. Hubner Seed Technical Bulletin. West Lebanon, IN: Huber. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2012) Dekalb Seed, corn product DKC61-69 brand (VT3). Dekalb Technical Bulletin. DeKalb, IL: Dekalb. 2 pGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Simmons, JT, Guza, CJ, Schulz, CR, Penner, D, Kells, JJ (2006) Inbred corn response to acetamide herbicides as affected by safeners and microencapsulation. Weed Technol 20: 458–465 Google Scholar
Bunting, JA, Sprague, CL, Riechers, DE (2004a) Corn tolerance as affected by the timing of foramsulfuron applications. Weed Technol 18: 757–762 Google Scholar
Bunting, JA, Sprague, CL, Riechers, DE (2004b) Physiological basis for tolerance of corn hybrids to foramsulfuron. Weed Sci 52: 711–717 Google Scholar
Damalas, CA, Eleftherohorinos, IG (2001) Dicamba and atrazine antagonism on sulfonylurea herbicides used for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15: 62–67 Google Scholar
Doohan, DJ, Ivany, JA, White, RP, Thomas, W (1998) Tolerance of early maturing corn (Zea mays) hybrids to DPX-79406. Weed Technol 12: 41–46 Google Scholar
Eberlein, CV, Rosow, KM, Geadelmann, JL, Openshaw, SJ (1989) Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci 37: 651–657 Google Scholar
Gower, SA, Loux, MM, Cardina, J, Harrison, SK, Sprankle, PL, Probst, NJ, Bauman, TT, Bugg, W, Curran, WS, Currie, RS, Harvey, RG, Johnson, WG, Kells, JJ, Owen, MDK, Regehr, DL, Slack, CH, Spaur, M, Sprague, CL, VanGessel, M, Young, BG (2003) Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol 17: 821–828 Google Scholar
Green, JM (1998) Differential tolerance of corn (Zea mays) inbreds to four sulfonylurea herbicides and bentazon. Weed Technol 12: 474–477 Google Scholar
Green, JM, Ulrich, JF (1993) Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci 41: 508–516 Google Scholar
Isaacs, MA, Wilson, HP, Toler, JE (2002) Rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron-methyl combinations with selected postemergence broadleaf herbicides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 16: 664–668 Google Scholar
Krausz, RF, Young, BG, Kapusta, G, Matthews, JL (2000) Application timing determines giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14: 161–166 Google Scholar
Mekki, M, Leroux, GD (1994) Activity of nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, and their mixture on field corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max), and seven weed species. Weed Technol 8: 436–440 Google Scholar
Mitra, S, Bhowmik, PC (1999) Effect of growth stages on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn (Zea mays) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol 13: 37–42 Google Scholar
Myers, MW, Curran, WS, VanGessel, MJ, Majek, BA, Scott, BA, Mortensen, DA, Calvin, DD, Karsten, HD, Roth, GW (2005) The effect of weed density and application timing on weed control and corn grain yield. Weed Technol 19: 102–107 Google Scholar
Nelson, ER, Penner, D (2006) Reduction of isoxaflutole injury to corn (Zea mays) with herbicide safeners and water-repellent adjuvants. Weed Technol 20: 999–1003 Google Scholar
Nolte, SA, Young, BG (2002) Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 16: 371–378 Google Scholar
Nurse, RD, Hamill, AS, Swanton, CJ, Tardif, FJ, Sikkema, PH (2007) Weed control and yield response to foramsulfuron in corn. Weed Technol 21: 453–458 Google Scholar
Ritter, RL, Menbere, H (2001) Preemergence and postemergence control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15: 879–884 Google Scholar
Shaner, G, Finney, RE (1977) The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. PhytoPath 67: 1051–1056 Google Scholar
Sikkema, PH, Knezevic, SZ, Hamill, AS, Tardif, FJ, Chandler, K, Swanton, CJ (1999) Biologically effective dose and selectivity of SAN 1269H (BAS 662H) for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 13: 283–289 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, AJ, Burke, IC, Everman, WJ, VanGessel, MJ, Davis, VM, Sikkema, PH (2016) Potential corn yield losses due to weeds in North America. Weed Technol 30: 979–984 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2010) Adjuvant comparison for postemergence weed control in corn. Can J Plant Sci 90: 543–547 Google Scholar
Tooley, PW, Grau, CR (1984) Field characterization of rate-reducing resistance to Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea in soybean. Phytopath 74: 1201–1208 Google Scholar
Whaley, CM, Armel, GR, Wilson, HP, Hines, TE (2006) Comparison of mesotrione combinations with standard weed control programs in corn. Weed Technol 20: 605–611 Google Scholar
Whaley, CM, VanGessel, MJ (2002) Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control with a field corn (Zea mays) weed management program. Weed Technol 16: 293–300 Google Scholar
Williams, MM, Pataky, JK (2010) Factors affecting differential sensitivity of sweet corn to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 58: 289–294 Google Scholar
Wilson, GC, Soltani, N, Tardif, FJ, Swanton, CJ, Sikkema, PH (2010) Control of volunteer cereals with post-emergence herbicides in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Protect 29: 1389–1395 Google Scholar