Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:06:09.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eradication of Noxious Visual Aids: Slides and Overheads That Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ian M. Heap ,
Larry C. Burrill ,
Steven A. Dewey  and
Gregory E. Macdonald
Ian M. Heap
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, 97331
Larry C. Burrill
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR, 97331
Steven A. Dewey
Affiliation:
Utah State Univ., Dep. of Plants, Soils and Biometeorology, Logan, UT, 84322
Gregory E. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed scientists regularly attend conferences, symposiums, and workshops to communicate with colleagues about their current weed research programs. Communication of research can be hindered by poor visual aids. Computer programs, film recorders, and color printers have greatly increased the ease of visual aid production but have also increased the opportunity to prepare incomprehensible presentations. The size of the text, the amount of information presented, and the contrast between the text color and background color are the most important factors that affect the legibility of visual aids. Text, tables, and graphs should be short, simple, and legible. Computers and film recorders are not essential to produce good visual aids. The greatest assets in the production of visual aids are common sense, familiarity with the production equipment, sufficient preparation time, and critical assessment of the visual aids well in advance of the presentation date.

Keywords

Educationextensionpresentationsseminarstalks
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 649 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Balan, P. 1989. Improving instructional print materials through text design. Perform. and Instruct. August: p. 13–17.Google Scholar
2. Bergeron, R. L. 1990 The uses of colors to enhance training communications. Perform. and Instruct. August: p. 34–37.Google Scholar
3. Burbank, L. and Prett, D. 1986. Designing printed instructional materials. perform. and Instruct. October: p. 5–9.Google Scholar
4. Carliner, S. 1991. The six deadly sins of educational communication. Perform. and Instruct. November: p. 29–32.Google Scholar
5. Crow, W. C. 1986. Communication Graphics. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 322 p.Google Scholar
6. Karten, N. 1988. How to use visuals in your presentation. Perform. and Instruct. March: p. 9–10.Google Scholar
7. Lawson, P. 1986. Effective instructional materials are more than content. Perform. and Instruct. October: p. 3–4.Google Scholar
8. Murgio, M. P. 1969. Communication Graphics. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, NY. 240 p.Google Scholar
9. Swan, D. and Burrill, L. 1990. Plant photography techniques. Weed Technol. 4:666–670.Google Scholar