Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:17:03.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Band Widths on Atrazine, Metribuzin, and Metolachlor Runoff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Gaynor  and
Ian J. Van Wesenbeeck
John D. Gaynor
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Harrow, Ontario, Canada NOR 1G0
Ian J. Van Wesenbeeck
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Harrow, Ontario, Canada NOR 1G0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The potential reduction in surface runoff loss of band-applied herbicides was studied in a rainfall simulation. Concentration and loss of atrazine, metribuzin, and metolachlor applied in a band 25, 50, or 75 cm wide on 1-m2 plots graded to < 0.5% slope were compared with that from a broadcast preemergence application. Herbicide concentration in runoff decreased with time after initiation of runoff and as application band width decreased. Band width reduced herbicide concentration in runoff to a greater extent than time after initiation of runoff. The 50-cm band treatment reduced atrazine and metribuzin loss 69 and 71%, respectively, from the broadcast treatment. Forty-nine percent less metolachlor was lost from the 50-cm band than from the broadcast treatment. Herbicide concentration or loss in surface runoff did not differ between the 50- and 25-cm band width treatments. Herbicide lost in runoff ranged from 4 to 7% of application with the smaller loss associated with narrower band widths. The greater reduction in atrazine and metribuzin loss in surface runoff than that associated with the reduction in input alone may be attributed to leaching or adsorption of herbicide by soil in the nonsprayed strip as runoff flowed from the treated to the nontreated areas. Band application of herbicides may provide an effective, consistent means to reduce herbicide loss in surface runoff.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dirnethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneReduced herbicide applicationsurface runoff lossacetamidetriazine
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 107 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Asmussen, L. E., White, A. W. Jr., Hauser, E. W., and Sheridan, J. M. 1977. Reduction of 2,4-D load in surface runoff down a grassed waterway. J. Environ. Qual. 6:159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baker, J. L. 1992. Effects of tillage and crop residue on field losses of soil-applied pesticides. p. 175–187 in Schnoor, J. L., ed. Fate of Pesticides and Chemicals in the Environment. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Coote, D. R., MacDonald, E. M., Dickinson, W. T., Ostry, R. C., and Frank, R. 1982. Agriculture and water quality in the Canadian Great Lakes Basin: I. Representative agricultural watersheds. J. Environ. Qual. 11:473–481.Google Scholar
4. Culley, J. L. B., Bolton, E. F., and Bernyk, V. 1983. Suspended solids and phosphorus loads from a clay soil: I. Plot studies. J. Environ. Qual. 12:493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eadie, A. G., Swanton, C. J., Shaw, J. E., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. Banded herbicide applications and cultivation in a modified no-till corn (Zea mays) system. Weed Technol. 6:535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frank, R., Clegg, B. S., Sherman, C., and Chapman, N. D. 1990. Triazine and chloroacetamide herbicides in Sydenham river water and municipal drinking water, Dresden, Ontario, Canada, 1981–1987. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 19:319–324.Google Scholar
7. Frank, R. and Sirons, G. J. 1979. Atrazine: its use in corn production and its loss to stream waters in southern Ontario, 1975–1977. Sci. Total Environ. 12:223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gaynor, J. D., MacTavish, D. C., and Findlay, W. I. 1992. Surface and subsurface transport of atrazine and alachlor from a Brookston clay loam under continuous corn production. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 23:240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gilliom, R. J., Alexander, R. B., and Smith, R. A. 1985. Pesticides in the nation's rivers, 1975–1980, and implications for future monitoring. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2271. U.S. Geological Survey. 26 p.Google Scholar
10. Glenn, S. and Angle, J. S. 1987. Atrazine and simazine in runoff from conventional and no-till corn watersheds. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 18:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hall, J. K., Hartwig, N. L., and Hoffman, L. D. 1983. Application mode and alternate cropping effects on atrazine losses from a hillside. J. Environ. Qual. 12:336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hall, J. K., Pawlus, M., and Higgins, E. R. 1972. Losses of atrazine in runoff water and soil sediment. J. Environ. Qual. 1:172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Holden, L. R., Graham, J. A., Whitmore, R. W., Alexander, W. J., Pratt, R. W., Liddle, S.K., and Piper, L. L. 1992. Results of the national alachlor well water survey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:935–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Kenimer, A. L., Mostaghimi, S., Young, R. W., Dillaha, T. A., and Shanholtz, V. O. 1987. Effects of residue cover on pesticide losses from conventional and notillage systems. Trans. ASAE 30:953–959.Google Scholar
15. Pantone, D. J., Young, R. A., Buhler, D. D., Eberlein, C. P., Koskinen, W. C., and Forcella, F. 1992. Water quality impacts associated with pre- and postemergence application of atrazine in maize. J. Environ. Qual. 21:567–573.Google Scholar
16. Sanderson, M. 1980. The climate of the Essex Region, Canada southland. Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
17. Sauer, T. J. and Daniel, T. C. 1987. Effect of tillage system on runoff losses of surface-applied pesticides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:410–415.Google Scholar
18. Stone, J. A. and Heslop, L. C. 1987. Blade cultivator, ridge and moldboard plow tillage comparison on a poorly drained soil. Trans. ASAE 30:61–64.Google Scholar
19. Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: The rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Tan, C. S., Drury, C. F., Gaynor, J. D., and Welacky, T. W. 1993. Integrated soil, crop and water management system to abate herbicide and nitrate contamination of the Great Lakes. Water Sci. Technol. 28:497–507.Google Scholar
21. Thurman, E. M., Goolsby, D. A., Meyer, M. T., and Kolpin, D. W. 1991. Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States: The effect of spring flush. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1794–1796.Google Scholar
22. Triplett, G. B. Jr., Conner, B. J., and Edwards, W. M. 1978. Transport of atrazine and simazine in runoff from conventional and no-tillage corn. J. Environ. Qual. 7:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Unger, P. W. 1990. Conservation tillage systems. Adv. Soil Sci. 13:27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Wauchope, R. D. 1978. The pesticide content of surface water draining from agricultural fields. A review. J. Environ. Qual. 7: 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Zobeck, T. M. and Onstad, C. A. 1987. Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: A review. Soil & Tillage Res. 9:1–20.Google Scholar