Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:48:41.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Weed Interference Duration and Weed-Free Period on Glufosinate-Resistant Rice (Oryza sativa)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wei Zhang ,
Eric P. Webster ,
David Y. Lanclos  and
James P. Geaghan
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 M. B. Sturgis, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 M. B. Sturgis, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David Y. Lanclos
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 M. B. Sturgis, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James P. Geaghan
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University AgCenter, 161 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effect of weed interference duration and weed-free period on glufosinate-resistant rice was evaluated in 1998 and 1999. Weed interference for more than 2 wk reduced plant height 12 wk after emergence compared with the season-long weed-free treatment. Grain yield loss of 1,090 to 4,880 kg/ha was observed when weeds were allowed to interfere with rice from 2 wk to season-long. The weed-free period study indicated that early control of weeds could sustain rice growth and yield potential. This research suggests that effective weed control from 1 to 6 wk after rice emergence is important in fields with high weed densities for maximizing yield potential of glufosinate-resistant rice.

Keywords

Glufosinaterice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Bengal’, ‘BNGL HC-11’, ‘BNGL-62’Herbicide-resistant riceWAE, wk after emergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 876 - 880
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bleasdale, J. K. A. 1960. Studies on plant competition. in Harper, J. L., ed. The Biology of Weeds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science. Pp. 133–142.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. P. and Linscombe, S. D. 1994. Field evaluation of transgenic glufosinate-resistant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 47:22.Google Scholar
Chamblee, R. W., Thompson, L. Jr., and Coble, H. D. 1982. Interference of broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria plattyphylla) in peanuts (Arachis bypogaea). Weed Sci. 30:45–49.Google Scholar
Chisaka, H. 1977. Weed damage to crops: yield loss due to weed competition. in Fryer, J. D. and Matsunaka, S., eds. Integrated Control of Weeds. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. Pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza-sativa) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:644–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanclos, Y. D., Webster, E. P., and Zhang, W. 2002. Glufosinate tank-mix combinations in glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 16:659–663.Google Scholar
Lanclos, Y. D., Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., and Linscombe, S. D. 2003. Response of glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa) to glufosinate application timings. Weed Technol. 17:157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Siachuk, J. K., Seilhan, K. P., Bollich, P. K., and Funderburg, E. R. 1999. General agronomic guidelines. in Anonymous ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Publication 2321. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center. Pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
Sankula, S., Braverman, M. P., and Linscombe, S. D. 1997a. Response of BAR-transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa) to glufosinate application timing. Weed Technol. 11:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankula, S., Braverman, M. P., and Linscombe, S. D. 1997b. Glufosinate-resistant, BAR-transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa) response to glufosinate alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 11:662–666.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 2083–2226.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1968. Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci. 16:252–255.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1983. Competition of spreading dayflower (Commelina diffusa) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 32:116–119.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1984. Competition of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 31:120–123.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice (Oryza sativa L). Weed Technol. 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr., Flinchum, W. T., and Seaman, E. E. 1977. Weed Control in U.S. Rice Production. Agriculture Handbook 497. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. 78 p.Google Scholar
Wheeler, C. C., Talbert, R. E., and Baldwin, F. L. 2000. Update: Liberty (glufosinate)-tolerant rice in Arkansas, 1997–1999. Proc. Rice Tech. Working Group 28:14.Google Scholar