Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:08:57.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Separate and Combined Treatments of Herbicides on Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ehsan Bijanzadeh  and
Hossein Ghadiri
Ehsan Bijanzadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Hossein Ghadiri*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at Shiraz, Iran, during 2000 and 2001 to investigate the effect of separate and combined herbicide treatments on weed control and corn yield. Separate and combined herbicide treatments included 14 combinations applied at two rates. Herbicides reduced weed biomass compared with the weedy check. In both years, maximum reduction in weed biomass was observed with atrazine plus alachlor at 1 + 2.44 and 1.5 + 1.92 kg ai/ha and minimum reduction in weed biomass was observed with rimsulfuron at 0.02 and 0.04 kg/ha. In 2000 and 2001, 2,4-D plus MCPA at 0.36 + 0.31 and 0.54 + 0.46 kg/ha, and alachlor plus 2,4-D plus MCPA at 1.92 + 0.54 + 0.46 kg/ha, and 2.44 + 0.36 + 0.31 kg/ha, controlled 80 to 100% of field bindweed and rimsulfuron at 0.02 and 0.04 kg/ha controlled 17 to 70% of field bindweed. All herbicide treatments controlled redroot pigweed 60 to 100%. In 2000, at 6 and 17 WAP, minimum biomass reduction of Chinese-lantern-plant was observed with 2,4-D plus MCPA at 0.36 + 0.31 and 0.54 + 0.46 kg/ha, and primisulfuron plus prosulfuron at 0.02 + 0.02 and 0.03 + 0.03 kg/ha. Rimsulfuron plus primisulfuron plus prosulfuron at 0.02 + 0.03 + 0.03 and 0.04 + 0.02 + 0.02 kg/ha reduced johnsongrass biomass 96 to 100% and the efficacy of rimsulfuron increased when tank mixed with primisulfuron plus prosulfuron. Results of both years showed that all herbicide treatments increased corn grain yield as compared with the weedy check. Maximum corn grain yield was obtained with combinations of atrazine plus alachlor at 1 + 2.44 and 1.5 + 1.92 kg/ha.

Keywords

Atrazinealachlorbentazonbromoxynil2,4-DMCPAprimisulfuronprosulfuronrimsulfuronchinese-lantern-plant, Physalis alkekengii L. #3 PHYALfield bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L. # CONARjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense L. # SORHAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREcorn, Zea mays L.Corn grain yieldweed biomassherbicidesWAPweeks after planting
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 640 - 645
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Behrens, R. 1975. Weeds and corn. Weeds Today 6:15–18.Google Scholar
Birschbach, E. D., Mark, G. M., and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) control in field corn (Zea mays L). Weed Technol. 7:431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbels, A. F. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Technol. 7:844–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeeni, A. R. Eghtedari and Ghadiri, H. 2000. Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) in Kooshkak and Badjgah in Fars province. J. Sci. Technol. Agric. Nat. Resour. 4:85–93.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays L). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamil, A. S. and Zhang, J. 1997. Rate and time of bentazon/atrazine application for broadleaf weed control in corn (Zea mays L). Weed Technol. 11:549–555.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Defelice, M. S., and Holman, C. S. 1997. Application timing affects weed control with metolachlor plus atrazine in no till corn (Zea mays L). Weed Technol. 11:207–211.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M., Edward, S., and Hagood, J. R. 1993. Weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) with primisulfuron as influenced by rate, timing and herbicide combinations. Weed Technol. 7:65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, L. R. 1988. Principles of weed threshold research. Weed Technol. 2:298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohassel, M. H. Rashed, Najafi, H., and Akbarzadeh, M. D. 2001. Weed Biology and Control. Mashhad, Iran: Ferdousi University Press. 404 pp.Google Scholar
Rosales-Robles, E. 1993. Post emergence shattercane (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays L.) in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico. Weed Technol. 7:830–834.Google Scholar
[SAS]. Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. Statistical Analysis Software. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean (Glycine max L). Weed Sci. 41:164–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanthinopoulos, S. and Katranis, N. 1998. Weed management of Amaranthus spp. in corn (Zea mays L). Weed Technol. 12:145–150.Google Scholar