Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:07:57.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Assessments of Serrated Tussock (Nassella trichotoma) as a Pasture Weed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David T. Vere ,
Bruce A. Auld  and
Malcolm H. Campbell
David T. Vere
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Veterinary Centre, Forest Road, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia
Bruce A. Auld
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Veterinary Centre, Forest Road, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia
Malcolm H. Campbell
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Veterinary Centre, Forest Road, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weeds reduce the livestock production from pastures and impose control costs on producers and governments. Economic assessments of pasture weed problems are required on and beyond the farm for planning private and public weed control. This requirement has several dimensions that can be used to demonstrate the economic effect of weeds and encourage weed control by the private and public sectors. This paper discusses the economic problems of pasture weeds and the procedures for multi-level economic assessments with a major pasture weed in Australia as an example, and demonstrates the important private and social economic benefits from controlling this weed.

Keywords

Serrated tussock, Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Hack. # STDTRExternalities
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 776 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alston, J. M. 1991. Research benefits in a multi-market setting: a review. Rev. Mark. Agric. Econ. 59:23–52.Google Scholar
2. Auld, B. A. and Coote, B. G. 1981. Prediction of pasture invasion by Nassella trichotoma (Gramineae) in southeast Australia. Prot. Ecol. 3:271–277.Google Scholar
3. Auld, B. A., Menz, K. M., and Medd, R. W. 1979. Bioeconomic model of weeds in pastures. Agro-Ecosys. 5:69–84.Google Scholar
4. Auld, B. A., Menz, K. M., and Tisdell, C. A. 1987. Weed Control Economics. Academic Press Inc., London.Google Scholar
5. Auld, B. A., Vere, D. T., and Coote, B. G. 1982. Evaluation of control policies for the grassland weed Nassella trichotoma in southeast Australia. Prot. Ecol. 1:141–148.Google Scholar
6. Blacklow, W. M. 1976. An analysis of weeds research in Australia. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 42:176–80.Google Scholar
7. Campbell, M. H. and Gilmour, A. R. 1979. Effect of time and rate of application of herbicides on serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma) and improved pasture species. 1. Glyphosate and 2,2-DPA. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Animal Hus. 19:472–475.Google Scholar
8. Campbell, M. H., Gilmour, A. R., and Vere, D. T. 1979. Effect of time and rate of application of herbicides on serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma) and inproved pasture species. 2. tetrapion. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Animal Hus. 19:476–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Campbell, M. H. 1982. The biology of Australian weeds. 9. Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Arech. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 48:76–84.Google Scholar
10. Campbell, M. H. 1987. Area and distribution of serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Arech.) in New South Wales. Plant Prot. Q. 2:161–164.Google Scholar
11. Campbell, M. H. 1990. Serrated tussock control. NSW Agriculture, Agfact P7.6.29. Agdex 647.Google Scholar
12. Chiarappa, L., Chiang, H. C., and Smith, R. F. 1972. Plant pests and diseases: assessment of crop losses. Science 176:769–773.Google Scholar
13. Menz, K. M. and Auld, B. A. 1977. Galvanised burr, control, and public policy towards weeds. Search 8:281–287.Google Scholar
14. Mishan, E. J. 1972. Elements of Cost-Benefit Analysis. George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
15. Mullen, J. D., Alston, J. M., and Wohlgenant, M. K. 1989. The effect of farm and processing research on the Australian wool industry. Aust. J. Agric. Econ. 33:32–47.Google Scholar
16. Pannell, D. J. 1988. Weed management: a review of applied economics research in Australia. Rev. Mark. Agric. Econ. 56:255–269.Google Scholar
17. Vere, D. T. and Auld, B. A. 1982. The cost of weeds. Prot. Ecol. 4:29–42.Google Scholar
18. Vere, D. T. and Campbell, M. H. 1979. Estimating the economic effect of serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma) in New South Wales. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 45:35–43.Google Scholar
19. Vere, D. T. and Campbell, M. H. 1984. Economics of controlling serrated tussock in the southeastern Australian rangelands. J. Range Manage. 37:87–93.Google Scholar