Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:48:16.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cuphea Tolerates Clopyralid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

F. Forcella*
Affiliation:
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267
S. K. Papiernik
Affiliation:
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267
R. W. Gesch
Affiliation:
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Cuphea is a new crop of temperate regions that produces seed oil that can substitute for imported coconut and palm kernel oils. Only four herbicides are known to be tolerated by cuphea to date. More herbicides, especially POST products, are needed for continued commercialization. In Minnesota and North Dakota, where cuphea currently is grown, greater control of Canada thistle and biennial wormwood is needed in cuphea. Because clopyralid is effective on both of these species, it was tested at rates ranging from about 25 to 850 g ae ha−1 in greenhouse and field trials. Visual assessment of injury, height, growth, and seed yield of cuphea were not reduced significantly in field-grown plants when clopyralid was applied at rates up to 400 g ae ha−1. Thus, at the rate commonly used in other crops, 200 g ae ha−1, clopyralid can be applied safely to cuphea.

La cufea (Cuphea viscosissima Jacq. × C. lanceolata W.T. Aiton), es un nuevo cultivo de regiones templadas que produce semillas oleaginosas que puede sustituir a los aceites importados de coco y de semillas de palma. Que se conozca, a la fecha solamente existen cuatro herbicidas que la cufea tolera. Se necesitan más herbicidas, especialmente productos POST para una continua comercialización del cultivo. En Minnesota y North Dakota (USA), donde actualmente se cultiva la cufea, se necesita un mejor control de las especies Cirsium arvense y Artemisia biennis. Debido a que clopiralid es efectivo en estas dos especies de maleza, el herbicida se evaluó en estudios de invernadero y de campo, en dosis que variaron de 25 a 850 g ea ha−1. En condiciones de campo, plantas de cufea no fueron significativamente disminuidas ya sea por daño, altura de crecimiento y rendimiento de semilla, cuando clopiralid se aplicó en dosis de hasta 400 g ea ha−1. Por lo tanto, clopiralid en dosis 200 g ea ha−1, que es la cantidad comúnmente utilizada en otros cultivos, puede aplicarse de manera segura a cufea.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, . 2008. Statistix 9.0. Users Manual. Analytical Software, Inc., Tallahassee, FL. http://www.statistix.com. Accessed: March 31, 2011.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1994. The biology of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense L.). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:77101.Google Scholar
Figueroa, R. A. and Doohan, D. J. 2006. Selectivity and efficacy of clopyralid on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Weed Technol. 20:101103.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Amundson, G. B., Gesch, R. W., Papiernik, S. K., Davis, V. M., and Phippen, W. B. 2005. Herbicides tolerated by cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata). Weed Technol. 19:861865.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Gesch, R. W., and Isbell, T. A. 2005. Seed yield, oil, and fatty acids of cuphea in the northwestern Corn Belt. Crop Sci. 45:21952202.Google Scholar
Gesch, R. W. and Forcella, F. 2007. Differential sensitivity to temperature of cuphea vegetative and reproductive growth. Ind. Crops Prod. 25:305309.Google Scholar
Gesch, R. W., Forcella, F., Barbour, N., Phillips, B., and Voorheees, W. B. 2002. Yield and growth response of cuphea to sowing date. Crop Sci. 42:19591965.Google Scholar
Kegode, G., Zollinger, R., and Ciernia, M. 2007. Biology and management of biennial wormwood. The Glyphosate, Weeds, and Crops Series. W-1322. NDSU Extension Service, Fargo, ND. 11 p. http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/plantsci/weeds/w1322.pdf. Accessed: December 8, 2010.Google Scholar
Kim, K-I., Gesch, R. W., Cermak, S. C., Phippen, W. B., Berti, M. T., Johnson, B. L., and Marek, L. 2011. Cuphea growth, yield, and oil characteristics as influenced by climate and soil environments across the upper Midwest USA. Ind. Crops Prod. 33:99107.Google Scholar
Papiernik, S. K., Yates, S. R., Koskinen, W. C., and Barber, B. 2007. Processes affecting the dissipation of the herbicide isoxaflutole and its diketonitrile metabolite in agricultural soils under field conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:86308639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose–response curves and statistical models. Pages 2956. In Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. E. 1984. Cuphea—a potential new crop. HortSci. 19:352354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, R., Christoffers, M., Endres, G., et al. 2010. North Dakota Weed Control Guide. W-253. NDSU Extension Service, Fargo, ND. http://www.ag.ndsu.edu/weeds/weed-control-guides/nd-weed-control-guide-1. Accessed: December 8, 2010.Google Scholar