Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:35:07.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clomazone, Fomesafen, and Bromoxynil Systems for Bromoxynil-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Shawn C. Troxler ,
Shawn D. Askew ,
John W. Wilcut ,
W. David Smith  and
Mary D. Paulsgrove
Shawn C. Troxler
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Shawn D. Askew
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
W. David Smith
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Mary D. Paulsgrove
Affiliation:
Herbicides, Bayer Crop Protection, RTP, NC 27709
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted at Clayton, Lewiston, and Rocky Mount, NC, to evaluate weed and cotton response to herbicide systems in bromoxynil-resistant Stoneville BXN 47 cotton. Herbicide systems that included clomazone preemergence (PRE) controlled broadleaf signalgrass, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and prickly sida greater than 88%. Inconsistent Palmer amaranth control was observed with the addition of fomesafen PRE to clomazone PRE and pendimethalin preplant-incorporated (PPI) herbicide systems. Addition of bromoxynil early postemergence (EPOST) to clomazone and pendimethalin systems increased ivyleaf morningglory control to greater than 84% and provided higher yields than did the same systems without bromoxynil. Bromoxynil EPOST followed by (fb) cyanazine + MSMA late postemergence directed (LAYBY) improved weed control in clomazone and pendimethalin systems. Clomazone PRE and pendimethalin PPI with or without fomesafen PRE fb bromoxynil EPOST fb LAYBY herbicides controlled weeds and yielded equivalent to the standard herbicide system of pendimethalin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb bromoxynil EPOST fb LAYBY.

Keywords

BromoxynilclomazonecyanazinefluometuronfomesafenMSMApendimethalinbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb) Nash. #3 BRAPPcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBELgoosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEINivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHElarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. # DIGSAPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’Herbicide-tolerant cropsEPOST, early postemergencefb, followed byLAYBY, late postemergence directedPD, postemergence directedPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 838 - 844
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Asher, B. S., Keeling, J. W., Dotray, P. A., and Segarra, E. 1998. Performance and economics of weed management systems for the Texas southern high plains. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 44.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Bailey, W. A., Scott, G. H., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and nontransgenic cotton in tilled and nontilled systems. Weed Sci. 50: 512–520.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 13: 308–313.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A. 1983. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control, regrowth, and tube production as affected by herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 419–422.Google Scholar
Barker, G., Kitchen, L. M., Vidrine, P. R., Crawford, S. H., and Millhollon, E. 1987. Weed control in Louisiana with preemergence applications of fomesafen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40: 40.Google Scholar
Baumann, P. A., Keeling, J. W., Morgan, G. D., and Smith, J. W. 1998. Evaluation of fomesafen for weed control in Texas cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 43–44.Google Scholar
Bond, J. A., Miller, D. K., Griffin, J. L., Milligan, J. L., and Wilson, C. F. 1998. Cotton tolerance and weed control with Reflex applied preemergence. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 11–12.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. 1992. Trends in weed control methods. In McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R., eds. Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation. pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and flauzifop. Weed Sci. 35: 270–276.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1997. Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 11: 335–344.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 4: 174–185.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1999. Weed management and net returns with transgenic, herbicide-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirstum). Weed Technol. 13: 411–420.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. 37 p.Google Scholar
Gossett, B. J., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1992. Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Technol. 6: 587–591.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B. 1998. BXN 47—a new look at the Buctril system. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 1: 851–852.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. R. 1998. Ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea L.) and slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridus L.) control in BXN cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 1: 852–854.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Clomazone as a component in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 7: 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, J. W., Dotray, P. A., Osborn, T. S., and Asher, B. S. 1998. Postemergence weed management with Roundup Ultra, Buctril, and Staple in Texas high plains cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 1: 861–862.Google Scholar
Keeton, A., Murdock, E. C., Stapleton, G. S., and Toler, J. E. 1994. Response of broadleaf weeds to Staple (DPX-PE350), bromoxynil, and glyphosate. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 2: 1316.Google Scholar
Lunsford, J. N., Harrison, S., and Smith, J. D. 1998. Reflex use in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 12–13.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75: 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, H. S., Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Smith, A. E. 2001. Influence of norflurazon placement on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Technol. 15: 327–331.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C. and Keeton, A. 1998. Where does fomesafen fit in South Carolina cotton weed management programs? Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 12.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C. and Toler, J. E. 1995. Weed control in bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. 1: 603–604.Google Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1995. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 4: 728–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 1999. Weed management in bromoxynil-resistant Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 47: 596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Weed management with pyrithiobac preemergence in bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed Sci. 49: 567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1990. Clomazone for weed control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 4: 648–652.Google Scholar
Retzinger, E. J. Jr. and Mallory-Smith, C. 1997. Classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 11: 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., Bennett, A. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton. Weed Sci. 49: 549–557.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Glyphosate systems for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 16: 191–198.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. 1995. Herbicide-resistant crops and implications for herbicide-resistant weeds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 38.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 192–197.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 1992. Wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) control in southeastern cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 45: 41.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3: 678–685.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. New York: CRC and Lewis Publishers. pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Vencill, W. K., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1997. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and post-directed herbicides. Weed Technol. 11: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Patterson, M. G., Wehtje, G. R., and Whitwell, T. 1988. Efficacy and economics of pendimethalin herbicide combinations for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Appl. Agric. Res. 3: 203–208.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Weed management programs for oil seed crops. In Smith, A. E., ed. Handbook of Weed Management Programs. New York: Marcel-Dekker. pp. 343–400.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. 2000. Weed management in cotton. In 2000 Cotton Information. Raleigh, NC: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University. pp. 69–111.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Jordan, D. L. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to clomazone and insecticide combinations. Weed Technol. 6: 796–800.Google Scholar