Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:55:23.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bounty Programs — An Effective Weed Management Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Celestine A. Lacey ,
Charles Egan ,
Wayne Pearson  and
Peter K. Fay
Celestine A. Lacey
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Mont. State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Charles Egan
Affiliation:
Columbus, MT 59019
Wayne Pearson
Affiliation:
Columbus, MT 59019
Peter K. Fay
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Mont. State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Residents in Stillwater County, MT, used a weed bounty program as an educational tool to promote awareness, detection, and control of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lam. # CENMA) on range and noncropland. Many people became involved with the weed control effort, weed awareness was increased, spotted knapweed was controlled, and the program was cost effective. The success of a weed bounty program is influenced by 1) the enthusiasm and innovations of the county extension agent, weed supervisor, or other key individual or group in the community; 2) the choice of the weeds selected; and 3) good media coverage of the bounty program. With proper planning and organization, weed bounty programs effectively promote awareness and action in other areas of public concern.

Keywords

Centaurea maculosaextension educationweed control supervisorCENMA
Type
Education
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 196 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barreto, C. L., and Fay, P. K. 1983. Use of selected communication techniques in a statewide weed awareness program. J. Agron. Ed. 12:17–21.Google Scholar
2. Bucher, Robert F. 1984. The potential cost of spotted knapweed to Montana range users. Coop. Ext. Serv., Mont. State Univ. Bull. 1316.Google Scholar
3. Chicoine, T. K., Fay, P. K., and Nielsen, G. A. 1985. Predicting weed migration from soil and climate maps. Weed Sci. 34:57–61.Google Scholar
4. Fletcher, R. A., and Renney, R. J. 1963. A growth inhibitor found in Centaurea spp. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43:475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Harris, P., and Cranston, R. 1979. An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lacey, C. A. 1987. An overview of the state noxious weed mangement plan. In Proc. Mont. Weed Control Assoc. Ann. Meeting. Jan. 13–15. Great Falls, MT.Google Scholar