No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
BAY SMY 1500 for Selective Control of Black Nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and Other Weeds in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Fields
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2017
Abstract
Black nightshade was selectively controlled along with other annual weeds in direct-seeded tomatoes by BAY SMY 1500 applied preemergence. BAY SMY 1500 was also found selective for transplanted tomatoes when applied prior to transplanting or soon after planting prior to black nightshade emergence. Black nightshade control and crop selectivity were obtained with BAY SMY 1500 at 0.75 and 1.25 kg ai ha-1 applied on sandy loam and clay loam soils, respectively.
Keywords
BAY SMY 1500 (proposed common name ethiozin), 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onetomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.black nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. ♯ SOLNIMonocrop rotationdiphenamidmetribuzin(Amaranthus blitoidesDatura stramoniumHeliotropium europeumAMABLDATSTHEOEUSOLNI
- Type
- Research
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America
References
Literature Cited
1.
DaSilva, J. F., and Warren, G. F.
1976. Effect of stage of growth on metribuzin tolerance. Weed Sci.
24:612–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Fortino, J. Jr., and Splittstoesser, W. E.
1974. Response of tomato to metribuzin. Weed Sci.
22:460–463.Google Scholar
3.
Fortino, J. Jr., and Splittstoesser, W. E.
1974. The use of metribuzin for weed control in tomato. Weed Sci.
22:615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.
Givelberg, A., Horowitz, M., and Poljakoff-Mayber, A.
1983. Germination behaviour of Solanum nigrum seeds. J. Exp. Bot.
35(153):588–598.Google Scholar
5.
Glaze, N. C.
1988. Weed control in direct-seeded tomato, Lycopersicum esculentum, for transplants. Weed Technol.
2:333–337.Google Scholar
6.
Hack, H., Eue, L., Strang, R. H., and Zeck, W. M.
1985. SMY-1500, a new selective herbicide for weed control in winter cereals. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds. Brighton, England:35–42.Google Scholar
7.
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. B.
1977.
Solanum nigrum L. p. 430–434
in
The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Univ. of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
8.
Karschon, R., Grunwald, C., and Weinstein, A.
1983.
Solanum nigrum L. and S. luteum Miller in the flora of Israel. Isr. J. Bot.
27:94–96.Google Scholar
9.
Kleifeld, Y., Blumenfeld, T., and Bargutti, A.
1989. Black nightshade control in tomatoes. Proc. 4th Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Mediterranean Symp. (Valencia, Spain), Vol. II:54–61.Google Scholar
10.
Maillet, J., and Abdel Fatah, H.
1983. Preliminary studies on competition between Solanum nigrum ssp.
nigrum L. (black nightshade) and transplanted Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. (tomato). Weed Res.
23: 217–219.Google Scholar
12.
Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Rogers, B. S.
1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci.
4:25–58.Google Scholar
13.
Pritchard, M. K., and Warren, G. F.
1980. Effect of light on the response of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and two weed species to metribuzin. Weed Sci.
28:186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.
Weaver, S. E., Smith, N., and Tan, C. S.
1987. Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum) caused by nightshade (Solanum spp.) interference. Weed Sci.
35:163–168.Google Scholar
15.
Weller, R. F., and Phipps, R. H.
1987. A review of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.). Prot. Ecol.
1:121–139.Google Scholar