Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:58:23.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) interference in simulated sweetpotato plant beds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2020

Stephen L. Meyers*
Affiliation:
Associate Extension/Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA; current: Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
T. Casey Barickman
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Professor, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Horticultural Unit, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, USA
Jeffrey L. Main
Affiliation:
Research Associate, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Pontotoc Ridge-Flatwoods Branch Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Pontotoc, MS, USA
Thomas Horgan
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate, North Mississippi Research and Extension Center–Horticultural Unit, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stephen L. Meyers, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907. (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2016 at Pontotoc and Verona, MS. On March 3 (Pontotoc) and March 7 (Verona), landscape fabric was placed in the bottom of polyethylene lugs, each 0.22 m2, then approximately 5 cm of a 1:1 (v/v) blend of soilless potting media and masonry sand was added. ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.] storage roots weighing between 85 and 227 g, and several with emerging sprouts ≤1 cm, were placed longitudinally in a single layer on the substrate, then covered with an additional 3 cm of the substrate. Sprouted yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) tubers were transplanted equidistantly into sweetpotato-containing lugs at six densities: 0, 18, 36, 73, 109, and 145 m−2. Trials were terminated 55 and 60 d after planting at Pontotoc and Verona, respectively. Predicted total sweetpotato stem cuttings (slips) decreased linearly from 399 to 312 m−2 as C. esculentus density increased from 0 to 145 m−2. Predicted total slip dry weight at a C. esculentus density of 145 m−2 was reduced 21% compared with 0 m−2. Predicted rotten sweetpotato storage roots increased from 2.6 to 11.3 m−2 as C. esculentus density increased from 0 to 145 m−2. In response to increasing C. esculentus density, sweetpotato seed roots exhibited increased proximal-end dominance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Ramon G. Leon, North Carolina State University

References

Barkley, SL, Chaudhari, S, Schultheis, JR, Jennings, KM, Bullen, SG, Monks, DW (2017) Optimizing sweetpotato seed root density and size for slip production. HortTechnology 27:715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basiouny, FM (1983) Influence of growth regulators, temperature, and red light on sprout production of three sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam. cultivars. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 96:144146Google Scholar
Bryson, CT, DeFelice, MS, eds (2009) Weeds of the South. Athens: University of Georgia Press. 331 pGoogle Scholar
Cooley, JS, Kushman, LJ (1938) The effect of storage temperatures on the sprouting of four varieties of sweet potatoes. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 50:311313Google Scholar
Cordner, HB, Thomson, H, Jayyoussi, MS (1966) Proximal dominance and plant production in bedded roots of the sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas Lam. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 88:472477Google Scholar
Ma, J, Aloni, R, Villordon, A, LaBonte, D, Kfir, Y, Zemach, H, Schwartz, A, Althan, L, Firon, N (2015) Adventitious root primordia formation and development in stem nodes of ‘Georgia Jet’ sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas. Am J Bot 102:10401049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyers, SL (2019) State Report—Mississippi. National Sweetpotato Collaborators Group Annual Meeting 37:32, February 1-2, 2019 in Birmingham, ALGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Shankle, MW (2015) Interference of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol 29:854860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, DW, Kalmowitz, KE, Monaco, TJ (1992) Influence of herbicides on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) plant production. Weed Technol 6:136138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Mills, RJ (1996) Effects of weeds and herbicides on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) transplant production using polyethylene bed covers. Weed Technol 10:273277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motis, TN, Locascio, SJ (2004) Critical yellow nutsedge-free period for polyethylene mulched bell pepper. HortScience 39:10451049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolston, LH, Clark, CA, Cannon, JM, Randle, WM, Riley, EG, Wilson, PW, Robbins, ML (1987) ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato. HortScience 22:13381339Google Scholar
Smith, SC, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Schutlheis, JR, Reberg-Horton, SC (2019) Tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds. Weed Technol 33:147152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2018) 2017 State Agriculture Overview—Mississippi. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=MISSISSIPPI. Accessed: May 7, 2018Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2014) Weed survey—southern states. Page 292 in Proceedings of the 67th Southern Weed Science Society. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Davis, JW, Culpepper, AS (2008) Glyphosate hinders purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) tuber production. Weed Sci 56:735742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Nichols, RL (2012) Changes in the prevalence of weed species in the major agronomic crops of the Southern United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci 60:145157CrossRefGoogle Scholar