Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:38:56.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Competition in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Duane P. Rathmann
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

The effects of various densities and durations of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) competition in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Evans’] were determined in the field during a 2-yr period. Season-long competition by densities of 1, 3,9, and 30 wild oat plants/m of row reduced soybean seed yield an average of 6, 17, 32, and 51%, respectively. An infestation of 30 wild oat plants/m of row did not reduce soybean yield if the period of competition was limited to 4 weeks after crop emergence; however, yields were reduced 29, 50, 63, 58, and 63% when wild oat competed for 5, 6, 7, and 8 weeks, or season long, respectively. Wild oat competition reduced soybean pods per plant and seeds per plant more than seeds per pod or seed weight.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, M. W. 1967. Basis of yield component compensation in crop plants with special reference to the field bean (Phaseolus vulgaris . Crop Sci. 7:505510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505508.Google Scholar
3. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oat in flax. Weed Sci. 16:501504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Effects of duration of wild oat competition in flax. Weed Sci. 16:509512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349359.Google Scholar
6. Dominguez, C. and Hume, D. J. 1978. Flowering, abortion, and yield of early-maturing soybeans at three densities. Agron. J. 70:801804.Google Scholar
7. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:2629.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281283.Google Scholar
10. Maun, M. A. 1977. Ecological effects of barnyardgrass on soybeans. Weed Sci. 25:128131.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 27:5864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126128.Google Scholar
13. Nieto, J. H., Brando, M. R., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. Pest. Art. News Sum. 14:159166.Google Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482488.Google Scholar
15. Parochetti, J. V. and Brown, J. R. 1977. Control of jimsonweed in soybeans with time of postemergence bentazon applications. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 31:85.Google Scholar
16. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wax, L. J. (Chairman Wild Oat Ad Hoc Research Working Group) 1976. Wild oat, a situation report. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo. 8 p.Google Scholar
18. Wyse, D. D. and Young, F. 1979. Jerusalem artichoke interference in corn and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 34:48.Google Scholar